good governance Recently Published Documents

Total documents.

  • Latest Documents
  • Most Cited Documents
  • Contributed Authors
  • Related Sources
  • Related Keywords

Good governance of local forest is neither easy nor cheap: Policy learning from Bimbia-Bonadikombo

Measuring good governance for islamic financial institutions for achieving islamic social finance objectives: the need for shariah governance index, policy options for strengthening evidence-informed health policy-making in iran: overall sasha project findings.

Abstract Background The institutionalization of evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP) is complex and complicated. It is complex because it has many players and is complicated because its institutionalization will require many changes that will be challenging to make. Like many other issues, strengthening EIHP needs a road map, which should consider challenges and address them through effective, harmonized and contextualized strategies. This study aims to develop a road map for enhancing EIHP in Iran based on steps of planning. Methods This study consisted of three phases: (1) identifying barriers to EIHP, (2) recognizing interventions and (3) measuring the use of evidence in Iran's health policy-making. A set of activities was established for conducting these, including foresight, systematic review and policy dialogue, to identify the current and potential barriers for the first phase. For the second phase, an evidence synthesis was performed through a scoping review, by searching the websites of benchmark institutions which had good examples of EIHP practices in order to extract and identify interventions, and through eight policy dialogues and two broad opinion polls to contextualize the list of interventions. Simultaneously, two qualitative-quantitative studies were conducted to design and use a tool for assessing EIHP in the third phase. Results We identified 97 barriers to EIHP and categorized them into three groups, including 35 barriers on the “generation of evidence” (push side), 41 on the “use of evidence” (pull side) and 21 on the “interaction between these two” (exchange side). The list of 41 interventions identified through evidence synthesis and eight policy dialogues was reduced to 32 interventions after two expert opinion polling rounds. These interventions were classified into four main strategies for strengthening (1) the education and training system (6 interventions), (2) the incentives programmes (7 interventions), (3) the structure of policy support organizations (4 interventions) and (4) the enabling processes to support EIHP (15 interventions). Conclusion The policy options developed in the study provide a comprehensive framework to chart a path for strengthening the country’s EIHP considering both global practices and the context of Iran. It is recommended that operational plans be prepared for road map interventions, and the necessary resources provided for their implementation. The implementation of the road map will require attention to the principles of good governance, with a focus on transparency and accountability.

The role of applying good governance standards on civil society organizations to achieve sustainable development

Countries and governments are seeking to develop their societies and achieve prosperity with growth for their people, through achieving comprehensive sustainable development, which guarantees the right of current generations to well-being, and preserving the right of subsequent generations through good exploitation of available resources, wealth and full preservation to the surrounding environment and not to destroy it. However, good governance reflects to recent global developments and changes that have coincided with changing in the system of political governance and the role of governments, as this concept was put forward in the framework of political programs in order to achieve development goals. Thus, good governance was provided and supported by international non-governmental organizations, such as the United Nations and international financial institutions, such as the World Bank, in order to add an authoritative, ethical way to practice power in managing the affairs of states and societies. The problem in this research paper was the extent of the contribution of civil society organizations in the development process, as a result of the weak role of governments and states, which forced these organizations to work side by side with governments in the process of achieving sustainable development. This paper relied on the descriptive and analytical approach and aimed to identify the important and effective role of civil society organizations in the process of achieving the development of peoples and societies. The study concluded that it is not possible for these civil organizations to contribute to achieving sustainable development with the absence or weakness of implementing and activating the standards of good governance, since good governance is the foundation to Achieve the real sustainable development.

State-owned enterprise governance in the Pacific: The application of local values and practices in Samoa and Tonga

<p><b>This research examined how state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in two Pacific countries approach their governance roles in a context where concepts of good corporate governance are changing internationally. The research considered whether corporate governance practice can be enhanced by the application of local cultural values and principles, and whether there are lessons learned from these two countries that could be shared more broadly.</b></p> <p>The study explored insights from current and former SOE board chairs, directors, CEOs, senior public officials from the Kingdom of Tonga (Tonga) and the Independent State of Samoa (Samoa), and subject matter experts, who discussed their experiences and insights about approaches to corporate governance. The research also examined the literature on the rationale for the concept of ‘good governance’ which emerged in the latter half of the twentieth century, and corporate governance principles that support SOE models, to provide context for participant responses.</p> <p>Twenty-six interviews were undertaken in Tonga and Samoa between July and September 2019. Twelve participants were interviewed about Tonga’s SOEs, 12 participants were interviewed about Samoa’s SOEs, and two participants were interviewed about both countries’ approaches to SOE governance.</p> <p>The research finds that the principles of good corporate governance are dynamic and responsive, and can be modified to fit local situations. Despite the challenges implementing corporate governance principles, SOE directors and officials from Tonga and Samoa are asking how these tools can be applied in their country and are actively adapting and innovating the corporate governance model to improve local application. There are important assertive signs of ambiculturalism reshaping the good governance narrative with a Pacific flavour.</p>

Lessons From Rojava for the Paradigm of Social Ecology

This essay addresses two related questions raised by the editors of the research topic for “Beyond the Frontiers of Political Science: Is Good Governance Possible in Cataclysmic Times?” In particular, it explores: 1) how we can identify new tools and perspectives from which to address the multiple and mutually reinforcing problems accumulating around climate change; and 2) what institutional alternatives to the nation-state need to be created and empowered to tackle such complex problems. It does so through an in-depth treatment of the paradigm of “social ecology” and the associated political project of “democratic confederalism.” It begins with an overview of the argument, first advanced by Murray Bookchin and subsequently adopted and adapted by the imprisoned Kurdish leader Abdullah Öcalan, that building an ecological society requires an assault on hierarchy in all its forms, and the construction of alternative, direct-democratic institutions capable of transcending the system of the capitalist nation-state. It sketches the institutional architecture of popular assemblies central to this project, both emphasizing their potential to contest capitalist social-property relations and hierarchies intrinsic to the nation-state and pointing out some sources of resilience of the existing system. It hones in on the experience of the revolutionary forces in control of the Autonomous Administration of North East Syria (AANES), who have been directly inspired by Öcalan’s ideas. It highlights both the AANES’s achievements as well as the significant obstacles it has encountered in the attempt to bring into being a radically-egalitarian, ecological society. It concludes by drawing lessons from these difficulties.

È possibile una gestione “ideale” della pandemia da malattia renale cronica?

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is recognized as one of the major categories of noncommunicable epidemic diseases and in the last decades it has been largely growing in incidence and prevalence all over the world. Ideal management of CKD pandemic should be comprehensive of measures of tertiary, secondary, primary and primordial prevention. So, it should include prompt diagnosis and treatment of traditional and non-traditional risk factors for CKD, optimal conservative treatment for non-dialysis dependent CKD patients and appropriated dialysis therapy or renal transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, these goals are not easy to obtain on a global scale. It would be possible only by a broad and holistic approach, ranging from good governance to achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs).

The Moderating Role of Financial Accessibility in Relationship between Resource Competence, Entrepreneurial Leadership, Good Governance and Performance of Micro Small Medium Enterprises in Batam, Indonesia

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship of resource competence, entrepreneurial leadership and good governance towards business performance and examine the moderating role of financial accessibility to the business performance of Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). This quantitative research involved 155 professional business women community (MSMEs), Batam, Riau, Indonesia. The data collected through a survey questionnaire with a non-probability sampling technique. The data analysed by using the structural equation modelling – partial least square (SEM-PLS). This study showed that resource competence, entrepreneurial leadership, and good governance have a significant positive relationship with Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Also, financial accessibility moderates the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and performance. In conclusion, this study has successfully identified the determinant factors that affect the business performance and moderating role of financial accessibility on business performance for Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MSMEs).

Good Governance in Jordanian Universities and Its Relationship with the Ability to Solve Administrative Problems, from the Point of View of Faculty Members

The study aimed at revealing the application of good governance in Jordanian universities and its relationship to the ability to solve administrative problems from the point of view of faculty members. The sample of the study consisted of (330) members of the Faculties of Educational Sciences, and the study was conducted in the academic year 2020/2021. Using the descriptive research method, the researchers designed a questionnaire as a study tool and verified its validity and stability. The findings showed that good governance in Jordanian universities was at a high level, with the absence of statistically significant differences in good government by gender or years of experience. The findings also showed a high level of ability to solve administrative problems by the heads of academic departments in the faculties of educational sciences, with no statistically significant differences in the ability to solve administrative problems by gender or years of experience. There was a positive relationship between the degree of good governance and the ability to solve administrative problems.   Received: 3 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 November 2021 / Published: 3 January 2022

Export Citation Format

Share document.

  • Harvard Kennedy School
  • HKS Faculty Scholarship
  • Communities & Collections
  • By Issue Date
  • FAS Department
  • Quick submit
  • Waiver Generator
  • DASH Stories
  • Accessibility
  • COVID-related Research

Terms of Use

  • Privacy Policy
  • By Collections
  • By Departments

Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea

Thumbnail

Published Version

Citable link to this page, collections.

  • HKS Faculty Scholarship [758]

Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)

  • Browse All Articles
  • Newsletter Sign-Up

Governance →

good governance research paper

  • 17 Jan 2024
  • Research & Ideas

Are Companies Getting Away with 'Cheap Talk' on Climate Goals?

Many companies set emissions targets with great fanfare—and never meet them, says research by Shirley Lu and colleagues. But what if investors held businesses accountable for achieving their climate plans?

good governance research paper

  • 09 Jan 2024

Could Clean Hydrogen Become Affordable at Scale by 2030?

The cost to produce hydrogen could approach the $1-per-kilogram target set by US regulators by 2030, helping this cleaner energy source compete with fossil fuels, says research by Gunther Glenk and colleagues. But planned global investments in hydrogen production would need to come to fruition to reach full potential.

good governance research paper

  • 02 Jan 2024
  • What Do You Think?

Do Boomerang CEOs Get a Bad Rap?

Several companies have brought back formerly successful CEOs in hopes of breathing new life into their organizations—with mixed results. But are we even measuring the boomerang CEOs' performance properly? asks James Heskett. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

good governance research paper

  • 28 Nov 2023

Economic Growth Draws Companies to Asia. Can They Handle Its Authoritarian Regimes?

The efficiency of one-party governments might seem appealing, but leaders need a deep understanding of a country's power structure and "moral economy," says Meg Rithmire. Her book Precarious Ties: Business and the State in Authoritarian Asia explores the delicate relationship between capitalists and autocrats in the region.

good governance research paper

  • 07 Nov 2023
  • Cold Call Podcast

How Should Meta Be Governed for the Good of Society?

Julie Owono is executive director of Internet Sans Frontières and a member of the Oversight Board, an outside entity with the authority to make binding decisions on tricky moderation questions for Meta’s companies, including Facebook and Instagram. Harvard Business School visiting professor Jesse Shapiro and Owono break down how the Board governs Meta’s social and political power to ensure that it’s used responsibly, and discuss the Board’s impact, as an alternative to government regulation, in the case, “Independent Governance of Meta’s Social Spaces: The Oversight Board.”

good governance research paper

  • 06 Jun 2023

The Opioid Crisis, CEO Pay, and Shareholder Activism

In 2020, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, a Fortune 50 company in the drug distribution industry, agreed to settle thousands of lawsuits filed nationwide against the company for its opioid distribution practices, which critics alleged had contributed to the opioid crisis in the US. The $6.6 billion global settlement caused a net loss larger than the cumulative net income earned during the tenure of the company’s CEO, which began in 2011. In addition, AmerisourceBergen’s legal and financial troubles were accompanied by shareholder demands aimed at driving corporate governance changes in companies in the opioid supply chain. Determined to hold the company’s leadership accountable, the shareholders launched a campaign in early 2021 to reject the pay packages of executives. Should the board reduce the executives’ pay, as of means of improving accountability? Or does punishing the AmerisourceBergen executives for paying the settlement ignore the larger issue of a business’s responsibility to society? Harvard Business School professor Suraj Srinivasan discusses executive compensation and shareholder activism in the context of the US opioid crisis in his case, “The Opioid Settlement and Controversy Over CEO Pay at AmerisourceBergen.”

good governance research paper

  • 02 May 2023

How Should Artificial Intelligence Be Regulated—if at All?

Some AI pioneers say the technology could be a risk to humanity, and some governments have taken steps to rein it in. But who should set the rules and what details must they consider? asks James Heskett. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

good governance research paper

  • 24 Apr 2023

What Does It Take to Build as Much Buzz as Booze? Inside the Epic Challenge of Cannabis-Infused Drinks

The market for cannabis products has exploded as more states legalize marijuana. But the path to success is rife with complexity as a case study about the beverage company Cann by Ayelet Israeli illustrates.

good governance research paper

  • 21 Apr 2023

The $15 Billion Question: Have Loot Boxes Turned Video Gaming into Gambling?

Critics say loot boxes—major revenue streams for video game companies—entice young players to overspend. Can regulators protect consumers without dampening the thrill of the game? Research by Tomomichi Amano and colleague.

good governance research paper

  • 31 Mar 2023

Can a ‘Basic Bundle’ of Health Insurance Cure Coverage Gaps and Spur Innovation?

One in 10 people in America lack health insurance, resulting in $40 billion of care that goes unpaid each year. Amitabh Chandra and colleagues say ensuring basic coverage for all residents, as other wealthy nations do, could address the most acute needs and unlock efficiency.

good governance research paper

  • 28 Mar 2023

The FDA’s Speedy Drug Approvals Are Safe: A Win-Win for Patients and Pharma Innovation

Expediting so-called breakthrough therapies has saved millions of dollars in research time without compromising drug safety or efficacy, says research by Ariel Stern, Amitabh Chandra, and colleagues. Could policymakers harness the approach to bring life-saving treatments to the market faster?

good governance research paper

  • 23 Mar 2023

As Climate Fears Mount, More Investors Turn to 'ESG' Funds Despite Few Rules

Regulations and ratings remain murky, but that's not deterring climate-conscious investors from paying more for funds with an ESG label. Research by Mark Egan and Malcolm Baker sizes up the premium these funds command. Is it time for more standards in impact investing?

good governance research paper

  • 14 Mar 2023
  • In Practice

What Does the Failure of Silicon Valley Bank Say About the State of Finance?

Silicon Valley Bank wasn't ready for the Fed's interest rate hikes, but that's only part of the story. Victoria Ivashina and Erik Stafford probe the complex factors that led to the second-biggest bank failure ever.

good governance research paper

  • 14 Feb 2023

Does It Pay to Be a Whistleblower?

In 2013, soon after the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had started a massive whistleblowing program with the potential for large monetary rewards, two employees of a US bank’s asset management business debated whether to blow the whistle on their employer after completing an internal review that revealed undisclosed conflicts of interest. The bank’s asset management business disproportionately invested clients’ money in its own mutual funds over funds managed by other banks, letting it collect additional fees—and the bank had not disclosed this conflict of interest to clients. Both employees agreed that failing to disclose the conflict was a problem, but beyond that, they saw the situation very differently. One employee, Neel, perceived the internal review as a good-faith effort by senior management to identify and address the problem. The other, Akash, thought that the entire business model was problematic, even with a disclosure, and believed that the bank may have even broken the law. Should they escalate the issue internally or report their findings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission? Harvard Business School associate professor Jonas Heese discusses the potential risks and rewards of whistleblowing in his case, “Conflicts of Interest at Uptown Bank.”

good governance research paper

Is Sweden Still 'Sweden'? A Liberal Utopia Grapples with an Identity Crisis

Changing political views and economic forces have threatened Sweden's image of liberal stability. Is it the end of the Scandinavian business-welfare model as we know it? In a case study, Debora Spar examines recent shifts in Sweden and what they mean for the country's future.

good governance research paper

  • 17 Jan 2023

Nestlé’s KitKat Diplomacy: Neutrality vs. Shared Value

In February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, and multinational companies began pulling out of Russia, in response. At Switzerland-based Nestlé, chief executive Mark Schneider had a difficult decision to make. Nestlé had a long tradition of neutrality that enabled it to operate in countries regardless of their political systems and human rights policies. But more recently the company had embraced Michael Porter’s “shared value” paradigm, which argues that companies have a responsibility to improve the business community and the health of their communities. What should Schneider do? Professor Geoffrey Jones discusses the viability of the shared value concept and the social responsibility of transnational corporations today in the case, “Nestlé, Shared Value and Kit Kat Diplomacy.”

good governance research paper

  • 04 Oct 2022

Cold Call: Corporate Governance and Growth Strategy at Capital SAFI

Jorge Quintanilla Nielsen started the independent asset management firm Capital SAFI in 2007. Now a leader in Bolivia’s closed-end funds industry with a total of $430 million in assets under management, Quintanilla planned to expand into other countries, like Peru and Colombia. He knew that governance would be one of the main aspects potential partners would evaluate. Capital SAFI’s board had evolved over time with the establishment of a governance committee, an assessment process for the board, professional development offerings for board members, tools to manage governance risk, and succession plans for board members and company executives. Would local and foreign investors be impressed by those measures or were additional improvements needed? Professor V. G. Narayanan discusses the importance of corporate governance in his case, “Building the Governance to Take Capital SAFI to the Next Level.”

good governance research paper

  • 20 Sep 2022

How Partisan Politics Play Out in American Boardrooms

The discord gripping the nation has reached the heights of corporate America, with costly consequences for companies and investors. Research by Elisabeth Kempf shows just how polarized the executive suite has become.

good governance research paper

  • 06 Sep 2022

Curbing an Unlikely Culprit of Rising Drug Prices: Pharmaceutical Donations

Policymakers of every leaning have vowed to rein in prescription drug costs, with little success. But research by Leemore Dafny shows how closing a loophole on drugmaker donations could eliminate one driver of rising expenses.

good governance research paper

  • 01 Sep 2022

Is It Time to Consider Lifting Tariffs on Chinese Imports?

Many of the tariffs levied by the Trump administration on Chinese goods remain in place. James Heskett weighs whether the US should prioritize renegotiating trade agreements with China, and what it would take to move on from the trade war. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Governance in the implementation of the UN sustainable development goals in higher education: global trends

  • S.I. : Transformative learning for Urban Sustainability
  • Published: 03 May 2023

Cite this article

  • Walter Leal Filho   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3993-8974 1 , 2 ,
  • Ismaila Rimi Abubakar   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-2302 3 ,
  • Mark C. Mifsud   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-9169 4 ,
  • João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-3904 5 ,
  • Clarissa Ferreira Albrecht 6 ,
  • Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-6740 7 , 13 ,
  • Bruno Borsari   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9463-333X 8 ,
  • Ayyoob Sharifi   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-8613 9 ,
  • Vanessa R. Levesque   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-3545 10 ,
  • Priscilla Cristina Cabral Ribeiro   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0824-9268 11 ,
  • Todd J. LeVasseur 12 , 16 ,
  • Paul Pace   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-1450 4 ,
  • Laís Viera Trevisan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3673-6573 14 &
  • Thais A. Dibbern   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4826-4614 15  

2401 Accesses

6 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Governance is a key component for implementing sustainable development (SD) initiatives in university teaching, research, and projects. This line of thinking also applies to implementing the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs). Despite the role of governance in guiding processes related to the SDGs, few studies have examined these relations in an integrative manner in higher education. To bridge this knowledge gap, this study assesses the connections between governance and implementing the SDGs at higher education institutions (HEIs). Specifically, it relies on two main methods. The first is a bibliometric analysis, where the literature on the topic has been analyzed. The second method uses case studies from a sample of universities. The combined dual approach has identified the extent to which governance issues influence how these organizations perceive and handle the SDGs. The study provides valuable recommendations that may assist HEIs in implementing the SDGs with a due emphasis on governance.

Similar content being viewed by others

good governance research paper

Promoting gender equality across the sustainable development goals

Walter Leal Filho, Marina Kovaleva, … Shiv Tripathi

good governance research paper

Understanding Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 on “quality education” from micro, meso and macro perspectives

Ellen Boeren

Inclusive education: Developments and challenges in South Africa

Petra Engelbrecht

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Governance and leadership in guiding sustainability initiatives at higher education

Governance at higher education institutions (HEIs) involves the structures and procedures for making decisions on issues affecting the university community and its stakeholders (Abubakar et al., 2020 ). It is argued that central to sound governance for HEIs in this century is achieving sustainability by strategically aligning their mission and activities with each institution's respective sustainability goals. An effective governance structure consists of functional leadership with adequate autonomy to fulfill its duties and guarantee the integrity of HEIs according to its missions and visions for achieving sustainable development (SD). Governance also plays a vital role in the entire management framework to promote campus sustainability through pedagogy, research, campus operations, and outreach. The role of governance in fostering sustainability at HEIs is also crucial in selecting campus sustainability plans and models, such as utilizing the university as a living laboratory and embedding universities within networks of regional social, environmental, and economic resilience (Leal Filho et al., 2022a , 2022b , 2022c ; Yusoff et al., 2021 ). The success of governance in guiding campus sustainability planning and implementing initiatives relies heavily on factors such as strategic planning, leadership commitment, robust support, sustainability culture, effective communication, and feedback mechanisms (Abdullah et al., 2017 ).

Campus governance can contribute to achieving the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs) at HEIs. While achieving SDG4 (ensuring quality education) is expected to be the central contribution of HEIs, sustainability teaching and exporting the principles of sustainable consumption to the larger community can help attain other SDGs. Indeed, HEIs have something to offer and contribute to all 17 SDGs, including building partnerships for SD. Abubakar et al. ( 2020 ) suggested that restructuring the governance of HEIs should include the following key issues: the first issue is that governance requires developing a clear sustainability vision, policies, and strategic plan for the respective HEI; the second issue is implementing SD objectives in education, research, outreach, partnerships, and campus operations. In addition, Abdullah et al. ( 2017 ) suggested incorporating sustainability principles and objectives into the implementation structure of campus plans.

Mader et al. ( 2013 ) highlight that good governance and management at an HEI include a leadership structure that promotes transparency, accountability, tracking, reporting, and planning systems. The authors posit that the following key elements can ensure sustainable leadership: the first consists of establishing a coordination committee headed by a qualified senior executive who reports directly to the head of the institution. The committee should be responsible for implementing the sustainability plan and targets and coordinating the overall environmental, social, and economic pillars of SD across all operations and activities of the HEI. Secondly, committee members should recognize, establish a link, and leverage existing sustainability efforts across the HEI and similar institutions. Third, governance entails constant collaboration and linkages across all relevant departments and units, such as capital works and facilities. Fourth is ensuring an audit and monitoring system for the HEI and regularly reporting the outcomes to the committee's head. The authors conclude that establishing efficacious management and governance structures is essential to successfully formulate, plan, and implement SD policies related to core activities and operations of any HEI (Mader et al., 2013 ).

Many studies indicate that university management or leadership decides the priorities of activities to be initiated and followed through on campus (Mader et al., 2013 ; Rieg et al., 2021 ; Stephens & Graham, 2010 ). Furthermore, leaders at HEIs are crucial to initiating and promoting the university's continuous support for a wide range of activities and guaranteeing their success. Universities can engage in ground-breaking activities focusing on various subjects, including sustainability and SD, both on and out of campus (Bauer et al., 2021 ). Good governance involving responsible leadership allows everyone, including staff and students, to take responsibility for their actions, accept risk, and develop innovative methods to deal with problems. Furthermore, it allows people to develop leadership skills and initiatives that can assist the university and the general community (Davis & Goedegebuure, 2017 ). University management can direct teaching, learning, and research toward initiatives necessary for local, national, and global change and address the wider population's challenges (Bauer et al., 2021 ). Boards of trustees are also expected to play a leadership role in governance for sustainability at HEIs.

Furthermore, HEIs leadership can provide platforms for co-creation and collaboration among faculties and disciplines, which may have a greater impact on their initiatives. Good governance can also coordinate the organization of inputs from different backgrounds, such as scientific and societal, creating initiatives that may help solve complex real-world problems (de Giesenbauer & Müller-Christ, 2020 ; Queiroz Machado et al., 2022 ). Aside from the initiatives practiced on campus, as mentioned above, higher education administrators can collaborate to create programs and initiatives with collective action to assist in researching and embedding sustainability within surrounding communities. This effort can be facilitated when administrators can leverage internal assets toward programs that can assist people outside of the academy, and this can also create a synergistic effect of creating opportunities for graduates to take their sustainability training into regional jobs that require sustainability skills and competencies, thus closing the loop on best practice impacts of effective HEI governance for sustainability. Furthermore, they can direct staff toward understanding, communicating, and documenting the impact of programs on sustainability (Smith et al., 2017 ), especially to donors and boards of trustees. A key example of university management and leadership playing a key role through initiatives can be taken from the COVID-19 pandemic. Leadership in universities led to the mobilization of resources, expertise, and human resources that assisted in combating the spread of the disease while embodying adaptive resilience at an institutional level. Apart from support for teaching, HEIs leadership kept scientific research at universities ongoing and often acted as a catalyst for scientific and technological development, even during the pandemic's peak (Leal Filho et al., 2022a , 2022b , 2022c ). Many universities had leadership that could reorganize priorities to engage in research, support communities, reduce the pandemic's impacts, raise awareness, or disseminate data (Anholon et al., 2020 ).

Despite the significance of governance in achieving SDGs at HEIs, several institutions implement sustainability initiatives without a formal governance framework (Bauer et al., 2021 ; Mader et al., 2013 ). Effectively advancing SD at HEIs requires coordination through a sound governance framework and institutional commitment. In several HEIs of the Global South, SD efforts lack an efficient institutional framework because of challenges, including a lack of standard practices and guidelines and forms of accreditation or generating and sharing best practices (Anholon et al., 2020 ; Davis & Goedegebuure, 2017 ). The SD efforts in several HEIs often center only on crafting SD visions and implementing some sustainability initiatives without a formal structure to guarantee success (Abubakar et al., 2020 ) or to centralize sustainability across all functional units of an entire university 'ecosystem.'

To fill this knowledge gap, the present study assesses the connections between governance and the implementation of the SDGs at HEIs using a combined approach of bibliometric analysis and case studies. It contributes to identifying the extent to which governance issues influence the ways the SDGs are perceived and handled by HEIs. The study provides valuable recommendations that may assist HEIs in implementing SDGs with an expected emphasis on governance. Achieving SDGs at HEIs is a complex and comprehensive endeavor requiring a systematic and integrated process under a governance framework rather than loose and arbitrary initiatives. It may take years to accomplish. This study is vital in helping address existing leadership shortcomings and gaps, promoting new solutions, and innovating ways of making HEIs more sustainable to streamline and speed up the process throughout higher education. Good governance is a key success factor in implementing SDGs in HEIs.

2 Governance and sustainable development practices in a higher education context

Universities are leaders in education, research, and innovation, having a key role in social change and promoting SD (Blasco et al., 2020 ). This important role can be seen in recent efforts such as the Decade of Education for Sustainability Development (2005–2014) and target 4.7 of the SDGs (Shulla et al., 2020 ; Trechsel et al., 2018 ). The SDGs and their targets involve a complex range of economic, social, and environmental challenges, requiring implementation throughout public and private organizations, including universities (Hoque et al., 2017 ; Zhu et al., 2021 ). HEIs that want to promote a culture of sustainability and responsibility will not be able to act as echo chambers or observers (Vogt & Weber, 2020 ). Rather, implementing the SDGs throughout the university system will require systemic paradigm shifts and a whole-institution approach in which HEIs adopt relevant policies and practices and provide funding and resources to support those new goals (Leal Filho et al., ; Sterling, 2004 ). This change in HEIs could raise their leadership quality, preparing the ground for a sustainable evolution of these institutions (Giesenbauer & Tegeler, 2020 ) while hopefully attracting top talent to faculty, staff, and student positions. This section provides an analysis of examples of two types of SD in practice: green office (GO) and green campuses.

Bautista-Puig and Sanz-Casado ( 2021 ) analyzed sustainability in HEIs through five dimensions. Three of them—University Governance, Assessment and Reporting, and Campus Operations (through a green or sustainability office)—can be seen as governance, management, and practices to promote sustainability in HEIs. The cited authors found a high association between a sustainability plan and having GO by analyzing the correlation between sustainability practices. The GO, or sustainability office, coordinates and supports sustainability actions, staff, faculty training, and budget line items dedicated to sustainability initiatives. They also foster awareness among students and staff on matters related to SD (Leal Filho et al., ).

The first GO was established at Maastricht University in 2010. Since then, the model has been replicated by 35 universities across Europe. The GO model is open-source to tailor-make it to individual, institutional needs. GOs cover a wide range of activities; for example, they co-organize sustainability events, conduct overviews of sustainability courses, co-design new courses, lobby for waste separation and solar cells, or advise student groups and staff who want to act on sustainability. In Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, GOs initiated a local food pickup station with 300 members and 25 weekly orders, while Maastricht University boosted e-waste recycling by 190%. Utrecht University convinced the caterer to introduce a daily vegan option in the cafeteria and developed the first sustainability report at Magdeburg University, Maastricht University, and Konstanz University (Adomßent et al., 2019 ).

Green Campus Initiatives (GCIs) models encompass HEIs’ sustainability initiatives, which require interaction between education and awareness (people), buildings/environment (place), and management (processes) at HEIs. One kind of GCI is on-campus housing. Four universities in the south of Brazil are GCIs’ examples of the categories such as clean energy, energy efficiency, water efficiency, waste management, sustainable transport, and education for sustainable development (ESD) (Ribeiro et al., 2021 ). They are replacing conventional lamps with LED lamps and installing presence sensors to activate lights in corridors and rooms (energy efficiency); rain harvesting systems are being installed in the new buildings, along with cisterns and faucets based on technologies to avoid water waste (efficient water use). Even though recycling presents a challenge at universities, they have facilities that allow selective waste collection. Therefore, they are implementing ESD within their policies (Ribeiro et al., 2021 ).

In the United States of America (USA), Hopkins ( 2022 ) gave some examples of universities that have initiatives related to green campuses, such as North Carolina State University, Virginia Tech, and the University of South Florida. North Carolina State University provides an online green living guide for students with recommendations on topics including transportation, eco-friendly eating, energy conservation, waste diversion, wellness, and water conservation (NC State University, 2021 ). Virginia Tech promotes sustainable living through LED lightbulbs, organic sheets, a drying rack for clothes, and The Green Office Certification Program to train staff, faculty, and students with the tools they need to work in more sustainable office areas (Virginia Tech, 2021 ). The University of South Florida (USF) living-learning communities focused on green lifestyles as options for students at Maple Hall, participating in various campus greening measures and sustainable programming, an annual swap shop, and a documentary series. The USF Patel College of Global Sustainability fosters sustainable urban communities and environments through collaborative research, education, and community involvement (University of South Florida, 2023 ).

It is unlikely that a single governance approach will work for all HEIs to promote sustainability. However, Fig.  1 outlines a more appropriate structure to place governance within central administration to develop SD strategies and policies for the Green Offices for implementing campus-based SD operations. While a specific, systemic strategy for advancing the SDGs in any given institution seems to be a common precursor to such action, the basic strategies benefit from being tailored to the local context and particular situation (Lang et al., 2006 ; Levesque & Wake, 2021 ). Furthermore, each university has its culture, governance structures, and goals that will influence which strategies will most likely result in a sustainability transition (Leal Filho et al., 2022a ; Stephens & Graham, 2010 ).

figure 1

A schematic overview of the relationship between governance, SD strategies, Green Office, and campus operations

This research is based on a mixed methods approach of bibliometric assessment and case studies to provide a more complete and subtle understanding of connections between governance and implementation of the SDGs in HEIs. Combining these methods benefits from the strengths of both methods while overcoming each method's limitations. Also, this approach will improve the study's reliability by supporting and validating the findings from each method. Below is the description of each method.

A bibliometric assessment to understand the connections between governance and implementation of the SDGs in HEIs from the literature (Perianes-Rodriguez et al., 2016 ).

Case studies complementing the bibliometric analysis to understand better how universities with a well-known reputation in sustainability address the issue in their governance, policies, and practices to promote 'green' campus management (Yin, 2014 ). Exploring the common themes and outcomes of the studies is expected to shine more light on the emerging theory regarding how governance influences the implementation of sustainability at HEIs worldwide.

The bibliometric analysis employed to collect and review publications was based on the search string presented in Table 1 . This table was created to find related publications in the Web of Science (WoS), an academic database with more than 182 million records published in more than 34,888 journals, books, and procedures (WoS, 2021 ).

The search string returned 423 publications on 25 September 2021. The chosen software to perform the bibliometric assessment was VOSviewer, whose main feature consists of constructing and visualizing a bibliometric network (VOSviewer, 2021 ). The method used to interpret and summarize the data was pursued through a co-occurrence analysis of a network graph, which represents the output, and the node’s diameter represents the frequency of occurrence of a term. The vicinity of this to another term indicates that they are expected to be associated, thus belonging to the same thematic cluster, due to their co-occurrence frequency (Perianes-Rodriguez et al., 2016 ; Van Eck & Waltman, 2010 , 2014 ).

Subsequently, through an in-depth review of the literature and among the identified 423 publications, six selected case studies were discussed to provide greater insight into the role of governance in the UN SDGs implementation in HEIs. Furthermore, this study also attempted to identify which universities, in a sample of 30 institutions from different countries, have a sustainability strategy or action plan and a member of senior management whose competence includes sustainability. Finally, the examples gathered provide an overview of the extent to which universities have strategies or action plans commonly used as part of governance implementation mechanisms. For this, the QS World University Rankings were adopted. Footnote 1

4 Results and discussion

The results and discussion of this study are divided into two subsections. The first aims to discuss through a bibliometric assessment what other authors have already studied about the role of governance in the UN SDGs implementation in HEIs. The second subsection aims to present some best practices and initiatives at universities to illustrate the role of governance—including green/sustainability offices as examples of governance strategies—in implementing the SDGs. Moreover, this study discusses case studies from 30 HEIs in different countries regarding the existence of a sustainability strategy or action plan and the role, if any, of a senior management stakeholder whose competencies include sustainability.

4.1 The role of governance in implementing the UN SDGs in higher education

Figure  2 illustrates the landscape of key concepts the researchers discovered when studying HEIs' governance in implementing the SDGs, which was achieved through the co-occurrence analysis performed on VOSviewer software. The output data generated a network graph consisting of four clusters that represent the main research strands of governance, such as managerial processes and policies (Paletta & Bonoli, 2019 ), how universities assemble internal resources to implement green campus operations—since the green campus is one of the aspects deriving from governance, how they are implementing sustainability into their educational systems such as teaching and learning, research, and services to the community, as well as how they are contributing to the UN 2030 SD Agenda (Blanco-Portela et al., 2017 ; Rieg et al., 2021 ). The analysis shows that managerial processes and issues related to integrating sustainability into the education system have received more attention. In addition, the transformations that occurred following the COVID-19 pandemic have also received considerable attention, as the intersection between the clusters on the left side of the figure indicates. This relationship is expected to be an area that will gain more attention in the coming years, considering the increasing use of smart solutions and technologies in HEIs (Leal Filho et al., 2022b ; Sharifi et al., 2021 ).

The blue cluster is closely related to the management concept of how HEIs could move toward a sustainability transformation process through practices and internal organization. Therefore, this cluster embraces these terms: management, transformation, growth, systems, future, technology, business model, and social innovation. This construct is highly reputed in the literature, which explores the drivers and barriers that could foster or hamper HEIs in their journey of shifting management processes toward sustainability (Blanco-Portela et al., 2017 ; Mader et al., 2013 ; Rieg et al., 2021 ). Also, management includes the proposal of appropriate methods, like the Supplier, Input, Process, Output, and Customer (SIPOC), which intends to analyze these issues at universities and understand how to align HEIs' strategies and policies with the SDGs (Fleacă et al., 2018 ). The transformation toward a more sustainability-oriented university is also connected to innovation processes, which Sanches et al. ( 2021 ) envisioned as an opportunity to nurture the modernization and integration of sustainability in universities. Indeed, harnessing technology and social innovation in governance approaches is critical for aligning HEI initiatives and activities with SDGs. In this context, some studies in this field are directed at identifying the main barriers to innovation, such as the management engagement and support during this process, as well as addressing the lack of other issues like establishing an environmental committee, technology, commitment of allied organizations, guidelines, policies, and adequate infrastructure (Ávila et al., 2017 , 2019 ). An additional discussion related to the transformation of universities' business models due to such a dynamic landscape, as described by Rof and team (2020), seems to be an emerging research field through the lens of innovation for sustainability and responsible management that more researchers legitimize (Bikse et al., 2016 ; Fleacă et al., 2018 ; Hueske & Pontoppidan, 2020 ).

The yellow cluster, in turn, considers terms such as policy, indicators, framework, challenges, barriers, and institutions. Despite being the smallest in the number of terms when compared to the others, this cluster brings the perspective of the HEIs' governance role in implementing sustainability, either in the campus operations or strategies, through policy frameworks, accountability, and monitoring systems (Leal Filho et al., 2021 ; Zahid et al., 2020 ). This perspective is crucial in studying governance for sustainability because while the blue cluster is related to transformation and innovation processes, the yellow considers whether universities are facing challenges and barriers in implementing indicators, institutional frameworks, and evaluation initiatives that could nurture the governance of the SDGs implementation at HEIs (Calitz et al., 2018 ; Du et al., 2020 ; Paletta & Bonoli, 2019 ; Sanches et al., 2021 ). This cluster, in particular, highlights the significance of institutional reforms and evaluation/monitoring frameworks to mainstream SDG-oriented agendas in HEIs and track progress toward integrating SDGs in university-based activities. This situation is unsurprising as the role of evaluation/monitoring in accelerating actions toward achieving the goals of plans, policies, and programs is widely acknowledged across different domains (Sharifi, 2019 ).

The red cluster illustrates how governance contributes to ESD in HEIs. It embraces constructs such as innovation, competencies, curriculum, students, knowledge, and ESD. According to various studies, this field aims to explore the administrative and policy aspects that could foster the implementation of sustainability across disciplines and curricula, as well as boost efforts from higher management teams and staff in enabling different learning and teaching approaches that could assist ESD (Albareda-Tiana et al., 2018 ; Franco et al., 2019 ; Kolb et al., 2017 ). The discussion on how to enhance students' engagement in dealing with the challenges affecting the achievement of sustainability (Leal Filho et al., 2019a , 2019b ), as well as the best pedagogical approaches to develop sustainability literacy, competencies, and attitudes among students (Ahamad & Ariffin, 2018 ; Caldana et al., 2021 ; Redman et al., 2021 ; Sonetti et al., 2019 ), are also relevant concepts of this cluster. The central position of the term 'behavior' on the right corner of this cluster is a testament to the importance of behavioral changes across different stakeholders to achieve transformational changes toward integrating the SDGs agenda in HEIs. Fostering such changes will only be possible with the will and commitment of university managers. They should lead efforts in reforming the curricula and enhancing the competencies to adapt to such reforms. In addition, this cluster's focus relies not only on students' enthusiasm but primarily, it centers on the universities' leaders (staff and workforce) through assessing and emphasizing the importance of training so that professionals can achieve a substantial knowledge level of competencies, and leadership, aligned with the sustainability challenges, to support campus operations, teaching, and research practices toward sustainability (Kolb et al., 2017 ; Leal Filho et al., 2020 ).

Finally, the green cluster brings about a discussion about the role of HEIs in contributing to the SDGs, focusing on the universities’ negative and positive externalities, especially on their impacts on the environmental dimension of sustainability, like climate change, energy, and food security (O'Keeffe, 2016 ; Sonetti et al., 2019 ; Zhu et al., 2021 ). It also tackles how HEIs are organizing their campus operations and managerial systems to either mitigate their impacts, e.g., energy inefficiency, greenhouse gas emissions, inefficient building systems, or wastewaters, or adapt their practices and activities to the 2030 Agenda for SD, legal regulations, and other initiatives, such as the green transitions (Amaral et al., 2020 ; Callisto et al., 2019 ; Gholami et al., 2020 ; Sanches et al., 2021 ; Tintoré et al., 2019 ). Strong connections between terms in this cluster and those in the others, e.g., transformation and policy, indicate that as living labs and innovation ecosystems, HEIs can lead actions toward addressing sustainability and climate change challenges. Moreover, they can lead by example and pave the way for scaling sustainability initiatives toward achieving SDGs (Fig.  2 ).

figure 2

Co-occurrence of key concepts on governance in implementing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in higher education

4.2 Case studies of good governance practices in implementing the UN SDGs in HEIs

To enhance the legitimation of the governance role in implementing the UN SDGs among HEIs, six selected case studies extracted from the literature review are presented and analyzed along with the four concept clusters of Fig.  2 . The universities selected for discussion are well known for their sustainability governance and leadership reputation in implementing sustainability systemically, not only in their educational and research practices but also in their campus operations (Sanches et al., 2021 ). As shown in Table 2 , the universities are: (1) Manchester Metropolitan University, (2) Freie Universität Berlin, (3) BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, (4) The Royal Institute of Technology, (5) Turin Polytechnic, and (6) Aalto University.

The fact that the sustainability efforts in these cases are institutionalized- and not “ad hoc"- and that there are budget provisions for the sustainability work suggests that there are clear indicators of leadership support. Also, as shown in Table 2 , the management of campus operations at the universities aims to enhance efficiency while mitigating the universities' negative impacts on several fronts. For example, all the case studies show a deep concern about climate protection and ecological responsibility by tackling these issues through several initiatives and policies directed at improving energy-use efficiency, conservation of resources, promoting awareness regarding energy efficiency, waste management, recycling, and transportation, while enhancing campus biological diversity. The latter is aligned with the green cluster, where universities are expected to contribute to the SDGs, protecting the environment and contributing to green transitions. In contrast, the blue cluster focuses on transformation and innovation processes HEIs undertake toward green transitions.

Another peculiar aspect of the case studies here is the extent to which formal governance mechanisms and environmental management standards and tools exist. Examples of these tools and the international environmental management standard are the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14,001; occupational health and safety management—ISO 45001; and the EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS). These management systems are also connected to the yellow cluster since they are related to the set of policies, management frameworks, and indicators to deal with sustainability challenges at HEIs (Disterheft et al., 2012 ; Jones et al., 2013 ).

To further discuss governance practices in implementing the UN SDGs in higher education, Table 3 presents a set of 30 HEIs ranked first by the QS World University Rankings 2023 while showing the existence, or not, of a sustainability strategy/action plan besides the existence of a senior administration member responsible for sustainability.

As shown in Table 3 , among the 30 HEIs ranked first in the QS World University Rankings 2023, 83.3% (25 HEIs) have sustainability action plans and strategies directly related to the topic. Moreover, 70% (21 HEIs) have at least one member of the senior administrator responsible for sustainability. Therefore, the top 18 HEIs have both action strategies and senior management members involved with sustainability, which shows the commitment assumed by these HEIs regarding sustainability governance, reaffirming its importance in implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals in the higher education context.

According to Leal Filho et al. ( 2017 ), HEIs can implement sustainability concepts in several university dimensions and relate these to their institutional framework, governance, and organizational change management. Most of the analyzed HEIs have a department responsible for sustainability in the institution—usually named the green office or sustainability office. At the same time, most institutions have a committee responsible for discussing and implementing SD strategies. The committees are inclusive and comprise students, staff, and managers, who discuss the topic dialogically.

Nevertheless, despite being well positioned in the ranking, some universities still need action plans and senior administration members responsible for sustainability. For example, in Nanyang Technological University (Singapore), Cornell University (USA), Columbia University (USA), and Johns Hopkins University (USA) there are action plans related to sustainability. However, there is no member responsible for this in the senior administration. In turn, The University of Hong Kong (China), The University of Tokyo (Japan), Paris Sciences et Lettres University (France), Seoul National University (South Korea), and Australian National University (Australia) have neither.

5 Conclusion and recommendation

In this paper, a mixed methods approach was used to better understand the connections between HEIs' governance with their implementation of the SDGs, including a focus on how universities with a well-known reputation in sustainability address the issue in their governance, policies, and practice. A rich literature that delves into multiple dimensions of governance and SDGs was found, including (1) how the internal management of an HEI creates drivers and barriers to advancing SDGs; (2) how policy framework and monitoring systems can nurture SDGs implementation; (3) how governance can advance ESD across disciplines and curricula; and (4) how governance related to SDGs can result in various negative and positive externalities of campus efforts and operations. The in-depth case studies brought together these pieces, validating the importance of governance in advancing the SDGs in these various ways. The case studies also demonstrate the need for any HEI governance system to be structured with that institution's specific context and needs.

This paper has some limitations. The first is that it analyzed aspects of governance in an SD context without deepening the debate on institutional constraints or the shortcomings of 'sustainable development' as a guiding concept. Secondly, the number of case studies analyzed is insufficient to consider all governance initiatives being implemented to date. Nevertheless, despite these constraints, the study contributes to filling the identified knowledge gap in the literature since it provides useful insights into the extent to which matters related to governance influence efforts to implement SD elements in HEIs.

The lessons and implications from this study are multi-fold. First, it is not to be expected that the type of governance required to advance the full suite of SDGs in HEIs will be created overnight, considering that the needed types of structures, policies, benchmarks, and educational systems will take time to develop, especially in the slow-moving bureaucracy of higher education, as highlighted by Trechsel et al. ( 2018 ). Secondly, it is observed that an adequate governance system is extremely helpful in ensuring support for sustainability initiatives. Moreover, this helps to provide some continuity instead of working on an ad hoc basis.

Taking incremental steps to address any of the steps illuminated in this paper would bring HEIs closer to the goal of implementing sustainability. However, in order to yield long-term benefits, some recommendations are made:

Governance initiatives need to be open and inclusive, considering sustainability characteristics and be long-term instead of focusing on short-term goals.

Governance processes should consider the variety of initiatives in HEIs, be they staff or student-led, and take these and their experiences into account.

Proper financial provisions should be made to support governance-related efforts since the starvation of funds may reduce efficiency.

Faculties should be empowered in governance decisions related to sustainability, as faculties have the biggest impact on student learning; undertake the most research; are involved with grants and collaborations across institutions; and have the academic freedom to question dominant paradigms precipitating unsustainability.

The role of a president/chancellor, and thus the board involved with hiring such a person, is important. Any HEI with a leader who does not understand sustainability and cannot articulate how their university is addressing the SDGs is currently ill-equipped to be led down a sustainability/SDG pathway, especially moving forward in this century with the impacts of rapid global heating still to come.

Finally, it is emphasized that HEIs governance systems should be geared to promote sustainability across the board, with the active participation of senior management on the one hand and academic and non-academic staff and students on the other. HEIs need to emphasize sustainability in education programs, as emphasized in the recent in-depth analysis about achieving the UN 2030 Agenda. Without all commitment, there will be no progress in this respect. Thus, governance is an important part of efforts to achieve the SD Agenda in higher education.

Data availability

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2023 (Accessed: 18 February 2023).

Aalto University. (2021). Report Sustainable development at Aalto University in 2020. Helsinki. https://www.aalto.fi/sites/g/files/flghsv161/files/2021-05/Sustainability%20report%20of%20Aalto%20University%202020.pdf .

Abdullah, A.H., Razman, R., & Muslim, R. (2017). A review of critical success factors of governance towards sustainable campus operations. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (vol. 226(1), p. 012057). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012057

Abubakar, I. R., Aina, Y. A., & Alshuwaikhat, H. M. (2020). Sustainable development at Saudi Arabian universities: An overview of institutional frameworks. Sustainability, 12 (19), 8008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198008

Article   Google Scholar  

Adhikari, D. R., & Shah, B. B. (2021). The state of the art in the incorporation of sustainable development goals in Nepalese Universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22 (6), 1373–1401. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2020-0460

Adomßent, M., Grahl, A., & Spira, F. (2019). Putting sustainable campuses into force: Empowering students, staff and academics by the self-efficacy Green Office Model. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20 (3), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0072

Ahamad, N. R., & Ariffin, M. (2018). Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards sustainable consumption among university students in Selangor, Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16 , 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.006

Albareda-Tiana, S., Vidal-Raméntol, S., & Fernández-Morilla, M. (2018). Implementing the sustainable development goals at University level. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19 (3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2017-0069

Álvarez, I., Etxeberria, P., Alberdi, E., Pérez-Acebo, H., Eguia, I., & García, M. J. (2021). Sustainable civil engineering: incorporating sustainable development goals in higher education curricula. Sustainability, 13 (16), 8967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168967

Amaral, A. R., Rodrigues, E., Gaspar, A. R., & Gomes, Á. (2020). A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university campus operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250 , 119558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119558

Anholon, R., Serafim, M. P., Lourenzani, W. L., Silva, I. B., & Rampasso, I. S. (2020). Leadership in Brazilian public universities: Initiatives conducted by three state universities of São Paulo in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Public Leadership, 17 (1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-09-2020-0092

Ávila, L. V., Beuron, T. A., Brandli, L. L., Damke, L. I., Pereira, R. S., & Klein, L. L. (2019). Barriers to innovation and sustainability in universities: An international comparison. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20 (5), 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0067

Ávila, L. V., Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L., Macgregor, C. J., Molthan-Hill, P., Özuyar, P. G., & Moreira, R. M. (2017). Barriers to innovation and sustainability at universities around the world. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164 , 1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.025

Barth, M. (2013). Many roads lead to sustainability: A process-oriented analysis of change in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14 (2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371311312879

Bauer, M., Rieckmann, M., Niedlich, S., & Bormann, I. (2021). Sustainability governance at higher education institutions: equipped to transform? Frontiers in Sustainability, 2 , 640458. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.640458

Bautista-Puig, N., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2021). Sustainability practices in Spanish higher education institutions: An overview of status and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295 , 126320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126320

Blanco-Portela, N., Benayas, J., Pertierra, L. R., & Lozano, R. (2017). Towards the integration of sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A review of drivers of and barriers to organisational change and their comparison against those found of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166 , 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.252

Blasco, N., Brusca, I., & Labrador, M. (2020). Drivers for universities’ contribution to the sustainable development goals: An analysis of Spanish public universities. Sustainability, 13 (1), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010089

BOKU. (2019). Sustainability Report. BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Wien. https://boku.ac.at/nachhaltigkeit/boku-nachhaltigkeitsbericht/boku-nachhaltigkeitsbericht-2019 .

Bukhari, S. K. U. S., Said, H., Gul, R., & Seraj, P. M. I. (2021). Barriers to sustainability at Pakistan public universities and the way forward. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, (ahead of Print) . https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2020-0352

Caldana, A. C. F., Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Lespinasse Sampaio, B., Gianotto, M. L., Talarico, A. C., & Batalhão, A. C. D. S. (2021). A hybrid approach to sustainable development competencies: The role of formal, informal and non-formal learning experiences. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, (ahead-of-Print) . https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0420

Calitz, A., Bosire, S., & Cullen, M. (2018). The role of business intelligence in sustainability reporting for South African higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19 (7), 1185–1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2016-0186

Callisto, M., Solar, R., Silveira, F. A. O., Saito, V. S., Hughes, R. M., Fernandes, G. W., Gonçalves-Júnior, J. F., Leitão, R. P., Massara, R. L., Macedo, D. R., Neves, F. S., & Alves, C. B. M. (2019). A humboldtian approach to mountain conservation and freshwater ecosystem services. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7 , 195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00195

Cebrián, G. (2018). The I3E model for embedding education for sustainability within higher education institutions. Environmental Education Research, 24 (2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1217395

Davis, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2017). Governance for sustainability in higher education. In Ethics in higher education: values-driven leaders for the futur e, chapter (vol. 12, pp. 217–230)

de Queiroz Machado, D., Matos, F. R. N., & de Mesquita, R. F. (2022). Relations between innovation management and organisational sustainability: A case study in a Brazilian higher education institution. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24 (9), 11127–11152.

Disterheft, A., da Silva, F., Caeiro, S. S., Ramos, M. R., & de Miranda Azeiteiro, U. M. (2012). Environmental Management Systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions—Top-down versus participatory approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31 , 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.034

Du, Y., Arkesteijn, M. H., den Heijer, A. C., & Song, K. (2020). Sustainable assessment tools for higher education institutions: guidelines for developing a tool for China. Sustainability, 12 (16), 6501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166501

Fleacă, E., Fleacă, B., & Maiduc, S. (2018). Aligning strategy with sustainable development goals (SDGs): Process scoping diagram for entrepreneurial higher education institutions (HEIs). Sustainability, 10 (4), 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041032

Fleig, R., do Nascimento, I. B., & Michaliszyn, M. S. (2021). Desenvolvimento Sustentável e as Instituições de Ensino Superior: Um Desafio a Cumprir. Arquivos Analíticos De Políticas Educativas, 29 (95), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5640

Franco, I., Saito, O., Vaughter, P., Whereat, J., Kanie, N., & Takemoto, K. (2019). Higher education for sustainable development: Actioning the global goals in policy, curriculum and practice. Sustainability Science, 14 (6), 1621–1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0628-4

FU Berlin. (2020). Sustainability Report. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin. https://www.fuberlin.de/sites/nachhaltigkeit/stabsstelle/kommunikation/berichte/_inhaltselemente/NB_englisch_2020.pdf

Bikse, V., Lusena-Ezera, I., Rivza, B., & Volkova, T. (2016). The Transformation of traditional universities into entrepreneurial universities to ensure sustainable higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18 (2), 75–88.

Gholami, H., Bachok, M. F., Saman, M. Z. M., Streimikiene, D., Sharif, S., & Zakuan, N. (2020). An ISM Approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green campus operations: Towards higher education sustainability. Sustainability, 12 (1), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010363

Giesenbauer, B., & Tegeler, M. (2020). The transformation of higher education institutions towards sustainability from a systemic perspective. In Universities as living labs for sustainable development (pp. 637–650). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15604-6_39

Giesenbauer, B., & Müller-Christ, G. (2020). University 4.0: Promoting the transformation of higher education institutions toward sustainable development. Sustainability, 12 (8), 3371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083371

Herbert, C. P., Busing, N., & Nasmith, L. (2021). Collaborative governance of postgraduate medical education: Can it be achieved? Medical Teacher . https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1951691

Higgins, B., & Thomas, I. (2016). Education for sustainability in universities: Challenges and opportunities for change. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32 (1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.56

Hill, L. M., & Wang, D. (2018). Integrating sustainability learning outcomes into a university curriculum. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19 (4), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2017-0087

Hopkins, E. A. (2022). Greening on-campus housing: Blending commercial and higher education contexts. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44 (4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2027611

Hoque, A., Clarke, A., & Sultana, T. (2017). Environmental sustainability practices in South Asian university campuses: An exploratory study on Bangladeshi universities. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19 , 2163–2180.

Hueske, A.-K., & Pontoppidan, C. A. (2020). GEROCO: A model for integrating sustainability in management education at HEIs. Leadership Strategies for Promoting Social Responsibility in Higher Education, 24 , 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000024009

Royal Institute of Technology—KTH (2021). University-wide sustainability objectives 2021–2025 and climate objectives 2021–2045. Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden https://intra.kth.se/en/styrning/miljo-hallbar-utveckling/styrande-dokument-for-mhu/overgripande-hallbar-klimat/universitetsovergripande-hallbarhetsmal-2021-2025-och-klimatmal-2021-2045-1.1032534

Jones, N., Roumeliotis, S., Iosifides, T., Hatziantoniou, M., Sfakianaki, E., Tsigianni, E., Thivaiou, K., Biliraki, A., & Evaggelinos, K. (2013). Students’ perceptions on environmental management of HEIs and the role of social capital: A case study in the University of the Aegean. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14 (3), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2011-0050

Kolb, M., Fröhlich, L., & Schmidpeter, R. (2017). Implementing sustainability as the new normal: Responsible management education—from a private business school’s perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 15 (2, Part B), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.009

Lang, J., Thomas, I., & Wilson, A. (2006). Education for sustainability in Australian Universities: Where is the action? Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 22 (2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600001373

Leal Filho, W., Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Caldana, A. C. F., Will, M., Lange Salvia, A., Rampasso, I. S., Anholon, R., Platje, J., & Kovaleva, M. (2020). Sustainability leadership in higher education institutions: An overview of challenges. Sustainability, 12 (9), 3761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093761

Leal Filho, W., Ozuyar, P. G., Dinis, M. A. P., Azul, A. M., Alvarez, M. G., Neiva, S. D. S., Salvia, A. L., Borsari, B., Danila, A., & Vasconcelos, C. R. (2022a). Living labs in the context of the UN sustainable development goals: state of the art. Sustainability Science . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01240-w

Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Abubakar, I. R., Mifsud, M., Azadi, H., Sharifi, A., LeVasseur, T., Luetz, J. M., Velazquez, L., Singh, P., Pretorius, R., & Lombardi, P. (2022b). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on routines of higher education institutions: A global perspective. Sustainability, 14 (21), 14105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114105

Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Frankenberger, F., Akib, N. A. M., Sen, S. K., Sivapalan, S., Novo-Corti, I., Venkatesan, M., & Emblen-Perry, K. (2021). Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23 (4), 6002–6020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00859-y

Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., Molthan-Hill, P., Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Vargas, V. R., & Caeiro, S. (2019a). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232 , 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309

Leal Filho, W., Wall, T., Barbir, J., Alverio, G. N., Dinis, M. A. P., & Ramirez, J. (2022c). Relevance of international partnerships in the implementation of the UN sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 13 (1), 613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28230-x

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Leal Filho, W., Will, M., Salvia, A. L., Adomssent, M., Grahl, A., & Spira, F. (2019b). The role of green and Sustainability Offices in fostering sustainability efforts at higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232 , 1394–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.273

Leal Filho, W., Wu, Y. J., Brandli, L. L., Avila, L. V., Azeiteiro, U. M., Caeiro, S., & Madruga, L. R. R. G. (2017). Identifying and overcoming obstacles to the implementation of sustainable development at universities. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 14 (1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2017.1362007

Levesque, V. R., & Wake, C. P. (2021). Organizational change for sustainability education: A case study of one university’s efforts to create and implement institution-wide sustainability competencies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22 (3), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2019-0285

Mader, C., Scott, G., & Abdul Razak, D. (2013). Effective change management, governance and policy for sustainability transformation in higher education. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4 (3), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2013-0037

Manchester Metropolitan University (2019). Annual Environmental Sustainability Statement. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester. https://www.mmu.ac.uk/sustainability/performance-and-reporting

NC State University. (2021). 2021 Sustainability Report. https://sustainability.ncsu.edu/about/track-our-progress/2021-sustainability-report/ (Accessed 2 February, 2023)

Nölting, B., Molitor, H., Reimann, J., Skroblin, J.-H., & Dembski, N. (2020). Transfer for sustainable development at higher education institutions—untapped potential for education for sustainable development and for societal transformation. Sustainability, 12 (7), 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072925

O’Keeffe, P. (2016). The role of Ethiopia’s public universities in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. International Review of Education, 62 (6), 791–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9599-9

Paletta, A., & Bonoli, A. (2019). Governing the university in the perspective of the United Nations 2030 Agenda: The case of the University of Bologna. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20 (3), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0083

Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10 (4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006

Pompeii, B., Chiu, Y. W., Neill, D., Braun, D., Fiegel, G., Oulton, R., Ragsdale, J., & Singh, K. (2019). Identifying and overcoming barriers to integrating sustainability across the curriculum at a teaching-oriented university. Sustainability . https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092652

Redman, A., Wiek, A., & Barth, M. (2021). Current practice of assessing students’ sustainability competencies: A review of tools. Sustainability Science, 16 (1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00855-1

Ribeiro, J. M. P., Hoeckesfeld, L., Dal Magro, C. B., Favretto, J., Barichello, R., Lenzi, F. C., Secchi, L., de Lima, C. R., & de Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2021). Green Campus Initiatives as sustainable development dissemination at higher education institutions: Students’ perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312 , 127671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127671

Rieg, N. A., Gatersleben, B., & Christie, I. (2021). Organizational change management for sustainability in higher education institutions: A systematic quantitative literature review. Sustainability, 13 (13), 7299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137299

Rof, A., Bikfalvi, A., & Marquès, P. (2020). Digital transformation for business model innovation in higher education: Overcoming the tensions. Sustainability, 12 (12), 4980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124980

Ruiz-Mallén, I., & Heras, M. (2020). What sustainability? Higher education institutions’ pathways to reach the agenda 2030 goals. Sustainability, 12 (4), 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041290

Sanches, F. E. F., Campos, M. L., Gaio, L. E., & Belli, M. M. (2021). Proposal for sustainability action archetypes for higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, (ahead-of-Print) . https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2021-0026

Sharifi, A. (2019). A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233 , 1269–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172

Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., & Kummitha, R. K. R. (2021). Contributions of smart city solutions and technologies to resilience against the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. Sustainability, 13 (14), 8018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148018

Shulla, K., Filho, W. L., Lardjane, S., Sommer, J. H., & Borgemeister, C. (2020). Sustainable development education in the context of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 00 (00), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1721378

Smith, J., Pelco, L. E., & Rooke, A. (2017). The emerging role of universities in collective impact initiatives for community benefit. Metropolitan Universities, 28 (4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18060/21743

Sonetti, G., Brown, M., & Naboni, E. (2019). About the triggering of UN sustainable development goals and regenerative sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 11 (1), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010254

Stephens, J. C., & Graham, A. C. (2010). Toward an empirical research agenda for sustainability in higher education: Exploring the transition management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18 (7), 611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.009

Sterling, S. (2004). Higher education, sustainability, and the role of systemic learning. In P. B. Corcoran & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise, and practice (pp. 49–70). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Virginia Tech. (2021). Students’ real-world experiences in sustainability at heart of Virginia Tech’s Gold STARS rating. Campus Experience. 12 April 2021. https://vtx.vt.edu/articles/2021/04/sustainability-stars.html (Accessed 2 February, 2023).

Tintoré, J., Pinardi, N., Álvarez-Fanjul, E., Aguiar, E., Álvarez-Berastegui, D., Bajo, M., Balbin, R., Bozzano, R., Nardelli, B. B., Cardin, V., Casas, B., Charcos-Llorens, M., Chiggiato, J., Clementi, E., Coppini, G., Coppola, L., Cossarini, G., Deidun, A., Deudero, S., et al. (2019). Challenges for sustained observing and forecasting systems in the Mediterranean Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6 , 568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00568

Politecnico di Torino. (2020) Sustainability Report 2019. Politecnico di Torino, Torino. https://www.campus-sostenibile.polito.it/it/content/download/1677/8656/file/PoliTO-SustainablePath-Report2019.pdf

Politecnico di Torino. (2021). Documento Programmatico Green Team. Editora Politecnico di Torino, Torino. https://www.campus-sostenibile.polito.it/it/content/download/1103/5285/file/Doc%20Programmatico%20Green%20Team%20STAMPA.pdf

Trechsel, L. J., Zimmermann, A. B., Graf, D., Herweg, K., Lundsgaard-Hansen, L., Rufer, L., Tribelhorn, T., & Wastl-Walter, D. (2018). Mainstreaming education for sustainable development at a Swiss University: Navigating the traps of institutionalization. Higher Education Policy, 31 , 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0102-z

University of South Florida (2023). Patel College of Global Sustainability. Research & Initiatives. https://www.usf.edu/pcgs/research-and-initiatives/initiatives.aspx (Accessed 2 February, 2023).

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

Vogt, M., & Weber, C. (2020). The role of universities in a sustainable society. why value-free research is neither possible nor desirable. Sustainability, 12 (7), 2811. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072811

VOSviewer. (2021). VOSviewer—Visualizing scientific landscapes . VOSviewer. https://www.vosviewer.com/ .

Weber, S., Bookhart, D., & Newman, J. (2009). Institutionalizing campus-wide sustainability: A programmatic approach. Sustainability, 2 (3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1089/SUS.2009.9869

Weiss, M., Barth, M., & von Wehrden, H. (2021). The patterns of curriculum change processes that embed sustainability in higher education institutions. Sustainability Science, 16 , 1579–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00984-1

WoS, Web of Science. (2021). Web of Science platform: Web of Science: Summary of Coverage . https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverage

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed., p. 282). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

Google Scholar  

Yusoff, S., Abu Bakar, A., Rahmat Fakri, M. F., & Ahmad, A. Z. (2021). Sustainability initiative for a Malaysian university campus: Living laboratories and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23 , 14046–14067.

Zahid, M., Ur Rahman, H., Ali, W., Habib, M. N., & Shad, F. (2020). Integration, implementation and reporting outlooks of sustainability in higher education institutions (HEIs): Index and case base validation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22 (1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2019-0308

Zhu, B., Wang, Z., Sun, C., & Dewancker, B. (2021). The motivation and development impact of energy saving to sustainability in the construction of green campus: A case study of the Zhejiang University, China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23 , 14068–14089.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper has been funded by the Inter-University Sustainable Development Research Programme and is part of the "100 papers to accelerate the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals" initiative.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

European School of Sustainability Science and Research, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

Walter Leal Filho

Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK

College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (Formerly, University of Dammam), P.O. Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia

Ismaila Rimi Abubakar

Centre for Environmental Education and Research (CEER), University of Malta, Msida, Malta

Mark C. Mifsud & Paul Pace

Faculty of Life Sciences, Research and Transfer Centre Sustainability & Climate Change Management (FTZ-NK), Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Ulmenliet 20, 21033, Hamburg, Germany

João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio

Departamento de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Campus Universitário, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil

Clarissa Ferreira Albrecht

UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), University Fernando Pessoa (UFP), Praça 9 de Abril 349, 4249-004, Porto, Portugal

Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis

Biology Department, Winona State University, Winona, MN, 55987, USA

Bruno Borsari

The IDEC Institute and The Network for Education and Research on Peace and Sustainability (NERPS), Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

Ayyoob Sharifi

Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, ME, 04038, USA

Vanessa R. Levesque

Department of Industrial Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Rua Passo da Pátria, 156, Room 306, Building D. São Domingos, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, 24210-240, Brazil

Priscilla Cristina Cabral Ribeiro

Environmental and Sustainability Studies Program, College of Charleston, Charleston, USA

Todd J. LeVasseur

Fernando Pessoa Research, Innovation and Development Institute (FP-I3ID), University Fernando Pessoa (UFP), Praça 9 de Abril 349, 4249-004, Porto, Portugal

School of Administration, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 855 Washington Luiz St, Porto Alegre, RS, 90010460, Brazil

Laís Viera Trevisan

Department of Science and Technology Policy, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

Thais A. Dibbern

Environmental Studies, Yale National University Singapore College, 18 College Ave West Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismaila Rimi Abubakar .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Filho, W.L., Abubakar, I.R., Mifsud, M.C. et al. Governance in the implementation of the UN sustainable development goals in higher education: global trends. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03278-x

Download citation

Received : 28 November 2022

Accepted : 18 April 2023

Published : 03 May 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03278-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Green campuses
  • Higher education institutions
  • Institutional framework
  • Sustainable development goals
  • Sustainability initiatives
  • University leadership
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

COMMENTS

  1. PDF Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea

    For the millions of people throughout the world who live in conditions of public insecurity and instability, corruption, abuse of law, public service failure, poverty, and inequality, good governance is a mighty beacon of what ought to be.

  2. (PDF) GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC ...

    What is "good governance"? How does it have an impact on a country's economy? This paper addresses the issue of causality between good governance and economic development, by examining...

  3. Full article: Good Governance as Reflexive Governance: In Praise of

    Dimensions of Good Governance. The coining of good governance as a normative ideal for public sector organization aims to combine the result-oriented principles of new public management with moral principles that belong to the heart of liberal democracies, such as participation, justice, equality before the law, accountability and legitimacy (cf. Hajer, van Tatenhove, & Laurent, Citation 2004 ...

  4. Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for ...

    1. Governance refers to a set of institutions and actors that are drawn from but also beyond the Government.

  5. good governance Latest Research Papers

    good governance Latest Research Papers | ScienceGate good governance Recently Published Documents TOTAL DOCUMENTS 6193 (FIVE YEARS 2529) H-INDEX 47 (FIVE YEARS 11) Latest Documents Most Cited Documents Contributed Authors Related Sources Related Keywords

  6. PDF Good Governance: Rule of Law, Transparency and Accountability

    Good Governance: Rule of Law, Transparency, and Accountability by Michael Johnston Department of Political Science, Colgate University Executive Summary Improved governance requires an integrated, long-term strategy built upon cooperation between government and citizens. It involves both participation and institutions.

  7. Ethics and good governance

    Ethics and good governance Presidential Address Published: 02 June 2020 Volume 184 , pages 379-398, ( 2020 ) Cite this article Download PDF Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript Roger D. Congleton 984 Accesses 3 Citations Explore all metrics Abstract

  8. PDF Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for ...

    Working Paper Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy WIDER Working Paper, No. 2012/30 Provided in Cooperation with: United Nations University (UNU), World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) Suggested Citation: Gisselquist, Rachel M. (2012) : Good governance as a concept,

  9. Good Governance: Principles, Pitfalls, and Best Practice

    Good governance is a holistic concept that extends beyond legislators and supervisors to encompass all central bank functions—from the setting of investment policy to database management.

  10. Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea

    Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP10-023, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Abstract ... Intuitively and in research, good governance is a seductive idea—who, after all, can reasonably defend bad governance? Nevertheless, the popularity of the idea has far outpaced ...

  11. (PDF) Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for

    Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy January 2012 Authors: Rachel M. Gisselquist United Nations University (UNU) Abstract and Figures Almost all major...

  12. Governance: Articles, Research, & Case Studies on Governance- HBS

    09 Jan 2024 Research & Ideas Could Clean Hydrogen Become Affordable at Scale by 2030? by Desmond Dodd The cost to produce hydrogen could approach the $1-per-kilogram target set by US regulators by 2030, helping this cleaner energy source compete with fossil fuels, says research by Gunther Glenk and colleagues.

  13. Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How

    Using multiple regression, we test the influence of different aspects of governance, namely participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions on SDG achievement at the national level, controlling for the effects of additional socio-economic conditions.

  14. The Reflection of Good Governance in Sustainable ...

    The research results point out that there are well-functioning strategic mechanisms in respect to the investigated issues, but more concern, involvement and interest are necessary to enhance vertical coordination mechanisms, to disseminate good practices about public consultation processes and to bring sustainable development strategies closer t...

  15. PDF What is Good Governance?

    Introduction Recently the terms "governance" and "good governance" are being increasingly used in development literature. Bad governance is being increasingly regarded as one of the root causes of all evil within our societies.

  16. The development of good governance model for performance improvement

    The purpose of this paper is to re-test the determinant factors of the quality of financial statements and performance of the government by adding contextual factors, such as the personal factor, system/administrative factor and political factor, that may affect the quality of financial statement information and performance of the government.

  17. The impact of corporate governance on firms' value in an emerging

    1. Introduction. Corporate governance (CGV) and sustainability are two domains that are receiving increasing attention by scholars as illustrated by the recent increase in the amount of research in this field (Naciti et al., Citation 2021).This, thereby, shows that both sustainability and the role of governance in sustainability are increasingly concerned (Naciti et al., Citation 2021).

  18. (PDF) What is Good Governance?

    Good governance is upholding the sovereignty of the state (Prabakaran, 2005), equal and easy access of the people to the services and facilities delivered by the state, while making public...

  19. Artificial intelligence and effective governance: A review, critique

    Governance Policy-making Public Administration ICT 1. Introduction The technology of Artificial Intelligence is barely 60 years old, but its emergence has led to such applications that profoundly affect our lives. It focuses on replicating and modifying human intelligence via artificial technologies to invent intelligent machines [1].

  20. PDF The significance of Good Governance: Case Study of Liben Woreda, Ethiopia

    accomplishing this research and paper but also for His charity, kindness, help and forgiveness. I value greatly the St. Mary's University College for arranging this ... Good governance plays a significant role in the economy, especially in facilitating the interest of the producers, marketing and other ...

  21. PDF Governance and Good Governance- A Conceptual Perspective

    This Research paper shall be helpful for the scholars, Politicians, Civil rights activists and ... Good Governance a Conceptual Paper BC Smith (2007) outlines that Good Governance is an opening ...

  22. PDF Good Governance in India: Challenges and Prospects

    This paper is intended to examine the framework of good governance in India. The paper is also intended to examine the challenges and prospects of good governance in India. The methodology will be qualitative in nature and secondary sources will be used and examined. The secondary source includes Books, Magazines, Journals and Newspapers etc.

  23. Governance in the implementation of the UN sustainable development

    Governance is a key component for implementing sustainable development (SD) initiatives in university teaching, research, and projects. This line of thinking also applies to implementing the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs). Despite the role of governance in guiding processes related to the SDGs, few studies have examined these relations in an integrative manner in ...

  24. Fostering green growth in Asian developing economies: The role of good

    This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the substantial impact of good governance and green growth on the phenomenon of resource curse in 17 developing Asian economies over the period from 1999 to 2020. Utilizing the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach, the research reveals that heightened government effectiveness and political stability are linked to a sustained reduction ...