impact factor scientific reports nature research

  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Nature Support
  • Solution home

Impact factors for journals

Nature portfolio, palgrave macmillan, bmc and springeropen.

A number of BMC and SpringerOpen journals have impact factors and some journals are being tracked by Clarivate Analytics and will receive their impact factor in due course. For any journal to have an impact factor it must be tracked by Clarivate Analytics for two years (for more information on how impact factors are calculated, please see here ).

To check whether a journal has an Impact Factor, and if so what that Impact Factor is, please select a journal title from the list available here . (for BMC journals) or here (for SpringerOpen journals).

Once on the journal website you can view the Impact Factor by clicking on 'About'; the Impact Factor will appear on the right-hand side of the page. Please see examples below: BMC Neuroscience

Nanoscale Research Letters 

Please note that if there is no impact factor stated on a Springer Nature journal's homepage then it has yet to be assigned one.

It is also worth noting that BMC has signed up to the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) . 

DORA is concerned with reducing the focus on impact factors to concentrate on improving the methods used by funding agencies, institutions and other organisations to assess the value of research output.  

For more information please visit our policy pages here .

A number of Nature Portfolio journals have impact factors and some journals are being tracked by Clarivate Analytics and will receive their impact factor in due course. For any journal to have an impact factor it must be tracked by Clarivate Analytics for two years (for more information on how impact factors are calculated, please see here ). 

To check whether a journal has an Impact Factor and, if so, what that Impact Factor is, please visit: Journal Metrics Please note that if there is no impact factor stated on a Springer Nature journal's homepage then it has yet to be assigned one.

It is also worth noting that Nature Portfolio has signed up to the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) . 

A number of Palgrave Macmillan journals have impact factors and some journals are being tracked by Clarivate Analytics and will receive their impact factor in due course. For any journal to have an impact factor it must be tracked by Clarivate Analytics for two years (for more information on how impact factors are calculated, please see here ). 

To check whether a journal has an Impact Factor and, if so, what that Impact Factor is, please visit: 

Journal Impact Factor

A number of Springer journals have impact factors and some journals are being tracked by Clarivate Analytics and will receive their impact factor in due course. For any journal to have an impact factor it must be tracked by Clarivate Analytics for two years (for more information on how impact factors are calculated, please see here ). 

Journal Metrics Report 2020

Related Articles

  • Latest Book Shipping Information
  • Latest Journal Shipping Information
  • Data Security
  • How can I obtain journal article reprints?
  • Recommended service discontinued
  • Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) research
  • Website accessibility for people with disabilities
  • Advertising information for our different brands
  • Springer Nature combats piracy
  • Discontinued and Ceased journals published by Springer Nature
  • Genuine / legitimate Springer Nature payment requests
  • Hawaii General Excise Tax
  • Red Globe Press (RGB) and MacMillan Learning (ML)
  • Red Globe Press (RGP) and Bloomsbury
  • Manage Cookie Settings on SpringerNature Websites
  • Journal Proposal to Springer Nature
  • Credit Control Communications
  • Subscription Cancellations for customers in Germany
  • Suitable Browsers for Nature.com
  • Account Deletion
  • Webform to submit queries regarding accessibility for people with disabilities

Article views count

impact factor scientific reports nature research

(New) Scientific Reports Impact Factor: Understanding the Metrics of Scientific Research: 2023-24

Scientific Reports Impact Factor

Scientific Reports Impact Factor – Scientific Reports is an open-access journal published by the Nature Research group that covers a broad range of scientific disciplines. It has gained popularity among researchers due to its fast publication times and wide readership. One of the metrics used to measure the impact of a journal is its impact factor . In this article, we will delve deeper into the scientific reports impact factor, what it means, and why it matters.

Table of Contents

1. What is the Scientific Reports Impact Factor?

The scientific reports impact factor is a metric that measures the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal over a two-year period. It is calculated by dividing the total number of citations by the total number of articles published in the journal during that time. The impact factor provides an indication of the journal’s influence and prestige within its field.

a. Scientific Reports Impact Factor List

Scientific Reports Update Impact Factor List

2. How is the Impact Factor Calculated?

The impact factor is calculated annually by Clarivate Analytics, which publishes the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The JCR provides a list of journals and their respective impact factors. To calculate the impact factor, Clarivate Analytics counts the number of citations received by articles published in the journal during the previous two years and divides it by the total number of articles published in the journal during the same period.

Nature Communications Impact Factor

3. Why is the Impact Factor Important?

The impact factor is important because it is widely used as a measure of a journal’s quality and influence. Researchers often consider the impact factor when deciding where to submit their work for publication. Similarly, funding agencies and academic institutions may use the impact factor when evaluating the research output of individuals or groups. High-impact factor journals may also attract more readers, which can increase the visibility and impact of individual articles.

4. The Pros and Cons of Using the Impact Factor

  • Provides a measure of a journal’s influence and prestige
  • Can be used to evaluate the quality and impact of research
  • Can be used to evaluate the performance of individuals or groups
  • High-impact factor journals may attract more readers and citations
  • The impact factor may be influenced by a small number of highly cited articles, which can skew the results
  • The impact factor may not reflect the quality or impact of individual articles
  • The impact factor may not be an accurate reflection of a journal’s quality or influence within a specific field
  • Over-reliance on the impact factor may encourage researchers to prioritize publishing in high impact factor journals over conducting high-quality research

5. What is a Good Impact Factor?

A “good” impact factor varies depending on the field and discipline. Journals with impact factors above 5 are generally considered to be highly influential and prestigious, while journals with impact factors below 1 are considered to be less influential. However, it is important to note that the impact factor should not be the sole determinant of a journal’s quality or influence.

6. How to Improve the Impact Factor of Scientific Reports?

There are several ways in which the impact factor of Scientific Reports can be improved:

  • Increase the number of articles published in the journal
  • Encourage more citations of articles published in the journal
  • Attract high-quality submissions from top researchers
  • Increase the visibility and readership of the journal

7. Alternative Metrics for Measuring Journal Impact

While the impact factor is a widely used metric for measuring the impact of journals, it is not without its limitations. As a result, alternative metrics have been developed to provide a more nuanced view of a journal’s impact. Some of these alternative metrics include:

  • Article-level metrics (ALMs): These metrics provide data on the individual articles published in a journal, such as the number of views, downloads, and social media mentions. ALMs can provide a more granular view of the impact of individual articles.
  • Altmetrics: Altmetrics measure the online attention and impact of scholarly articles, including mentions in social media, news media, and blogs. Altmetrics can provide a broader view of the impact of research beyond traditional citation metrics.
  • Eigenfactor Score: The Eigenfactor Score measures the influence of a journal based on the number of citations it receives, as well as the influence of the journals that cite it. This metric takes into account the quality of the journals that are citing a particular journal.

8. Conclusion

The scientific reports impact factor is an important metric for measuring the quality and influence of the journal. It provides a measure of the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal over a two-year period. While the impact factor has its limitations, it remains a widely used metric for evaluating the quality and impact of research. Alternative metrics such as ALMs, altmetrics, and the Eigenfactor Score can provide a more nuanced view of a journal’s impact.

  • What is a good impact factor for Scientific Reports (Scientific Reports Impact Factor)? A good impact factor varies depending on the field and discipline. Journals with impact factors above 5 are generally considered to be highly influential and prestigious, while journals with impact factors below 1 are considered to be less influential.
  • How is the impact factor calculated? The impact factor is calculated by dividing the total number of citations received by articles published in the journal over a two-year period by the total number of articles published in the journal during that time.
  • What are alternative metrics for measuring journal impact? Alternative metrics for measuring journal impact include article-level metrics (ALMs), altmetrics, and the Eigenfactor Score.
  • Can the impact factor be influenced by a small number of highly cited articles? Yes, the impact factor may be influenced by a small number of highly cited articles, which can skew the results.
  • Is the impact factor the sole determinant of a journal’s quality or influence? No, the impact factor should not be the sole determinant of a journal’s quality or influence. Other factors such as the quality of individual articles, the reputation of the editorial board, and the relevance of the journal to a particular field should also be considered.

Admin

Open Access Journals has been found with a genuine mission of giving free access to quality scholarly research journals and dissertations to everyone in need and impacting countless people in the process. We know it’s tough to get hands-on educational journals that pack a punch. We give you the tools so that you can have the advantage and be smarter by learning a bit more.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Scientific Reports

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Subject Area and Category

  • Multidisciplinary

Nature Publishing Group

Publication type

Information.

How to publish in this journal

[email protected]

impact factor scientific reports nature research

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

Leave a comment

Name * Required

Email (will not be published) * Required

* Required Cancel

The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.

Scimago Lab

Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2022. Data Source: Scopus®

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Cookie settings

Cookie Policy

Legal Notice

Privacy Policy

Nature, Science, and PNAS: disciplinary profiles and impact

  • Published: 06 May 2020
  • Volume 123 , pages 1301–1315, ( 2020 )

Cite this article

  • Staša Milojević 1  

6094 Accesses

8 Citations

21 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Nature , Science , and PNAS are the three most prestigious general-science journals, and Nature and Science are among the most influential journals overall, based on the journal Impact Factor (IF). In this paper we perform automatic classification of ~ 50,000 articles in these journals (published in the period 2005–2015) into 14 broad areas, to explore disciplinary profiles of these journals and to determine their field-specific IFs. We find that in all three journals the articles from Bioscience, Astronomy, and Geosciences are over-represented, with other areas being under-represented, some of them severely. Discipline-specific IFs in these journals vary greatly, for example, between 18 and 46 for Nature . We find that the areas that have the highest disciplinary IFs are not the ones that contribute the most articles. We also find that publishing articles in these three journals brings the prestige for articles in all areas, but at different levels, the least being for Astronomy. Comparing field-specific IFs of Nature , Science and PNAS to other top journals in six largest areas (Bioscience, Medicine, Geosciences, Physics, Astronomy, and Chemistry) these three journals are always among the top seven journals, with Nature being at the very top for all fields except in Medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Ackerson, L. G., & Chapman, K. (2003). Identifying the role of multidisciplinary journals in scientific research. College & Research Libraries, 64 (6), 468–478.

Article   Google Scholar  

Archambault, É., & Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79 (3), 635–649.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Rankings of Information and Library Science journals by JIF and by h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics, 4 (2), 141–147.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2012). Journal report card. Scientometrics, 92 (2), 249–260.

Bornmann, L., Werner, M., Gasparyan, A. Y., & Kitas, G. D. (2012). Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatology International, 32 (7), 1861–1867.

Calcagno, V., Demoinet, E., Gollner, K., Guidi, L., Ruths, D., & de Mazancourt, C. (2012). Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science, 338 (6110), 1065–1069.

Csiszar, A. (2018). The scientific journal: Authorship and the politics of knowledge in the nineteenth century . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

De Rijcke, S., Wouters, P., Rushforth, A., Franssen, T., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—A literature review. Research Evaluation, 25 (2), 161–169.

Ding, J., Ahlgren, P., Yang, L., & Yue, T. (2018). Disciplinary structures in Nature, Science and PNAS: Journal and country levels. Scientometrics, 116 (3), 1817–1852.

DORA. (2012). San Francisco declaration of research assessment . Retrieved November 21, 2019 from http://www.ascb.org/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf .

Fang, H. (2015). Classifying research articles in multidisciplinary science journals into subject categories. Knowledge Organization, 42 (3), 139–153.

Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., et al. (2018). Science of science. Science . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185 .

Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479.

Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295 (1), 90–93.

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56 (3), 357–367.

Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999a). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 44 (3), 427–439.

Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Schoepflin, U., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999b). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 46 (3), 431–441.

Gordon, M. D. (1984). How authors select journals: A test of the reward maximization model of submission behavior. Social Studies of Science, 14, 27–43.

Haustein, S. (2012). Multidimensional journal evaluation: Analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor . Berlin: De Gruyter Saur.

Hicks, D. M., & Katz, J. S. (1996). Where is science going? Science, Technology and Human Values, 21 (4), 379–406.

Ioannidis, J. P. (2006). Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: Analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS ONE, 1 (1), e5.

Javitz, H., Grimes, T., Hill, D., Rapoport, A., Bell, R., Fecso, R., & Lehming, R. (2010). U.S. Academic Scientific Publishing. Working paper SRS 11-201. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.

Johns, A. (1998). The nature of the book: Print and knowledge in the making . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kaneiwa, K., Adachi, J., Aoki, M., Masuda, T., Midorikawa, A., Tanimura, A., et al. (1988). A comparison between the journals Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 13 (3–4), 125–133.

Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1995). The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approach . Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Rosary College, River Forest, IL.

Larivière, V., Kiermer, V., MacCallum, C., McNutt, M., Patterson, M., Pulverer, B., et al. (2016). A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions. Biorxiv . https://doi.org/10.1101/062109 .

López-Illescas, C., Noyons, E. C., Visser, M. S., De Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2009). Expansion of scientific journal categories using reference analysis: How can it be done and does it make a difference? Scientometrics, 79 (3), 473–490.

Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research . San Diego: Academic Press.

Google Scholar  

Milojević, S., Radicchi, F., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Citation success index—An intuitive pair-wise journal comparison metric. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (1), 223–231.

Milojević, S. (2020). Practical method to reclassify Web of Science articles into unique subject categories and broad disciplines. Quantitative Science Studies . https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00014 .

Moed, H. F., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1996). Impact factors can mislead. Nature , 381 (6579), 186.

Palmer, C. L. (1996). Information work at the boundaries of science: Linking library services to research practices. Library Trends, 45 (2), 165–191.

Price, D. J. de Solla. (1961). Science since Babylon . New Haven: Yale University Press.

Price, D. J. de Solla. (1963). Little science, big science . New York: Columbia University Press.

Price, D. J. de Solla. (1974). Society’s needs in scientific and technical information. Ciência da Informação, 3 (2), 97–103.

Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. PNAS, 105, 17268–17272.

Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems . New York: Oxford University Press.

Reedijk, J., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Is the impact of journal impact factors decreasing? Journal of Documentation, 64 (2), 183–192.

Rousseau, R. (2002). Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues. Library Trends, 50 (3), 418–439.

Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2012). Interactions between journal attributes and authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (6), 1213–1225.

Rushforth, A., & De Rijcke, S. (2015). Accounting for impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the making of biomedical research in the Netherlands. Minerva, 53 (2), 117–139.

Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (9), 628–638.

Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314 (7079), 498–502.

Sekara, V., Deville, P., Ahnert, S. E., Barabási, A. L., Sinatra, R., & Lehmann, S. (2018). The chaperone effect in scientific publishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (50), 12603–12607.

Stringer, M., Sales-Pardo, M., & Amaral, L. A. (2008). Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE, 3 (2), e1683.

Thelwall, M. (2012). Journal impact evaluation: A webometric perspective. Scientometrics, 92 (2), 429–441.

Verma, I. M. (2015). Impact, not impact factor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 112 (26), 7875–7876.

Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (12), 2378–2392.

Ziman, J. (1969). Information, communication, knowledge. Nature, 224, 318–324.

Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9 (1), 66–100.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work uses Web of Science data by Clarivate Analytics provided by the Indiana University Network Science Institute and the Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center at Indiana University. This material is based upon work supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-19-1-0391. I dedicate this paper to the memory of my dear friend and colleague Judit Bar-Ilan. I think she would have been interested in this topic and I wish we had an opportunity to work on it together.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Center for Complex Networks and Systems Research, The Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA

Staša Milojević

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Staša Milojević .

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Judit Bar-Ilan (1958–2019), an outstanding scholar and an inimitable friend and colleague.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Milojević, S. Nature, Science, and PNAS: disciplinary profiles and impact. Scientometrics 123 , 1301–1315 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03441-5

Download citation

Received : 26 November 2019

Published : 06 May 2020

Issue Date : June 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03441-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Journal impact
  • Multidisciplinary journals
  • Disciplinary structure

Advertisement

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research
  • Global Assessment Report (GAR)
  • PreventionWeb

Special Events

  • Global Platform
  • International Day for Disaster Reduction
  • World Tsunami Awareness Day
  • Sendai Framework Monitor
  • Voluntary Commitments
  • UNDRR Africa
  • organization

Nature Scientific Reports

Scientific Reports is an online, open access journal from the publishers of Nature. It publishes scientifically valid primary research from all areas of the natural and clinical sciences.

The 2016 journal metrics for Scientific Reports are as follows:

  • 2-year impact factor: 4.259
  • 5-year impact factor: 4.847
  • Immediacy index: 0.647
  • Eigenfactor ® score: 0.38761 
  • Article influence score: 1.482
  • 2-year median: 3

The Sendai Framework Voluntary Commitments (SFVC) online platform allows stakeholders to inform the public about their work on DRR. The SFVC online platform is a useful toolto know who is doing what and where for the implementation of the Sendai Framework, which could foster potential collaboration among stakeholders. All stakeholders (private sector, civil society organizations, academia, media, local governments, etc.) working on DRR can submit their commitments and report on their progress and deliverables.

Contact information

Is this page useful.

Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window) .

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts

Browse Articles

impact factor scientific reports nature research

The social anatomy of climate change denial in the United States

  • Dimitrios Gounaridis
  • Joshua P. Newell

Publisher Correction: A single-stage dual-source inverter using low-power components and microcomputers

  • Majid Ghani Varzaneh
  • Amirhossein Rajaei
  • Mohamadreza Khosravi

Author Correction: Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task

  • Mika Koivisto
  • Simone Grassini

Publisher Correction: Categorization of disaster-related deaths in Minamisoma city after the Fukushima nuclear disaster using clustering analysis

  • Hiroki Yoshimura
  • Toyoaki Sawano
  • Masaharu Tsubokura

impact factor scientific reports nature research

The efficacy of Denosumab in the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: a retrospective comparative study

  • Jun-Ki Moon
  • Jinyong Park
  • Pil Whan Yoon

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Comparison of tendon and muscle belly vibratory stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke upper extremity spasticity: a retrospective observational pilot study

  • Kenta Takeuchi
  • Takashi Takebayashi
  • Shinichi Shimada

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Climate change contribution to the 2023 autumn temperature records in Vienna

  • Johannes Laimighofer
  • Herbert Formayer

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Microcirculatory changes in the skin after postmastectomy radiotherapy in women with breast cancer

  • Sherif Elawa
  • Robin Mirdell
  • Simon Farnebo

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Novel tumor marker index using carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a significant prognostic factor for resectable colorectal cancer

  • Teppei Kamada
  • Hironori Ohdaira
  • Yutaka Suzuki

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may predict efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitors in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective cohort study

  • Jianxin Chen
  • Qinhong Zheng
  • Junhui Wang

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Efficacy of 3D-printed eye model to enhance retinoscopy skills

  • Dong Hyun Kim
  • Hee Kyung Yang
  • Jeong-Min Hwang

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Introducing a new auto edge detection technique capable of revealing cervical root resorption in CBCT scans with pronounced metallic artifacts

  • Negar Khosravifard
  • Bardia Vadiati Saberi
  • Mohammad Ebrahim Ghaffari

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Efficient, high-power, narrow-linewidth, continuous-wave quantum-dot semiconductor comb laser

  • Mikhail Buyalo
  • Alexey Gubenko
  • Ashok V. Krishnamoorthy

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Acoustic emission characteristics and damage evolution of different rocks under uniaxial compression conditions

  • Jianchun Ou
  • Enyuan Wang
  • Guoqing Zhu

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Assessing the efficacy of simulation-based education for paramedics in extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma under physician guidance

  • Akiko Ohira
  • Hisashi Masuyama

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Recreational athletes during downhill-mountain biking (DMB) show high incidence of upper extremity fractures in combination with soft-tissue injuries

  • Franziska Lioba Breulmann
  • Claudia Krenn
  • Martin Bischofreiter

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Pneumococcal colonization and coinfecting respiratory viruses in children under 5 years in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a prospective case–control study

  • Fiseha Wadilo Wada
  • Adey Feleke Desta
  • Adane Mihret

impact factor scientific reports nature research

New generative methods for single-cell transcriptome data in bulk RNA sequence deconvolution

  • Toui Nishikawa
  • Masatoshi Lee
  • Masataka Amau

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Association between triglyceride glucose index and total bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2011–2018

  • Ningsheng Tian

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle

  • Isabel Saldanha
  • Martha Betson
  • Lucas J. Cunningham

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

impact factor scientific reports nature research

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Scientific Reports Impact factor: “riding high”

impact factor scientific reports nature research

Our research is usually based on the journal’s impact factor (IF), which denotes the significance of the work published in a specific journal. A scientist’s research is evaluated based on the impact factor, representing a journal’s prestige. An article’s impact factor is determined by how many times it was cited in a particular year. A report by Clarivate Analytics, Web of Science Journal Citation Reports (WoS JCR), includes Journal Impact Factors each year.

Recently, it has been found that Scientific Reports, a journal of Nature Publishing Group with an option of open-access, is gaining popularity and importance among researchers for its wide coverage of all research areas, such as natural sciences, medicine, psychology, and engineering. The main reason this journal is a researcher’s choice is its publishing house and ease of publication than other core journals of Nature.

Scientific Reports Journal metrics

  • Scientific Reports is the fifth most-cited journal in the world as per Clarivate Analytics, 2020 (2021 Journal Citation Reports).
  • Scientific Reports is Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and DOAJ-indexed, enhancing its credibility.
  • Scientific Reports’ impact factor in 2022-23 is 4.997 as per the latest update.
  • The 2-year and 5-year impact factors are 4.996 and 5.516, respectively. Even though it marks a slight decrease, the difference is not high enough.
  • Although Scientific Reports’ impact factor is not high, it is still a prominent option to publish as it has a smooth publication process and accepts quality content in a wide range.

Scientific Reports Peer-review Policy

Scientific Reports’ review time includes its first decision in 56 days and the acceptance time of 133 days. Since it publishes scientific content of robust quality and maintains originality, Scientific Reports’ acceptance rate is 49% which is good for any journal as it has a rigorous peer-review process.

Scientific Reports is a high-impact journal, although its IF is less because of its experienced and extensive editorial team that adheres to a constructive peer-review process and follows all editorial and ethical policies.

To maintain the journal’s high impact and quality, the journal charges an APC after the paper is accepted, which may vary, starting from €1,570.

A global journal such as Scientific Reports ranks higher than 77% of the journals with an impact factor.

For more exciting content, do visit our website https://www.manuscriptedit.com/scholar-hangout/ . You can also mail us at [email protected] for your queries. Happy reading!!!

Related Posts

Co-author guide and acceptance letter in a journal.

Some journals may send Co-Authors an email containing deep links to confirm Co-Authorship. Corresponding Authors may also be allowed to control the Other Author verification procedure by the Journal. Who is the Co-author? A Co-author is someone who has made a significant contribution to a journal publication. They also share accountability and responsibility for the […]

Understanding manuscript evaluation by high impact journals

Every academician wants to publish their articles in high impact journals. This in turn makes it extremely challenging as all such journals are flooded with submissions. In fact, for many of these journals, it is a challenge for the editorial team to select suitable articles to publish from the sea of submissions. As an author, […]

How to Identify Peer-Reviewed Journals

Professors, as well as students, require peer-reviewed journals while doing research because they provide authentic information. These journals are scholarly and refereed, which is why academicians look for them for publication. Authors write their papers, and expert reviewers assess them to maintain their quality. Usually, the reviewers do not know the article’s authors. Therefore, the […]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

  • Global Assessment Report (GAR)
  • PreventionWeb

Special Events

  • Global Platform
  • International Day for Disaster Reduction
  • World Tsunami Awareness Day
  • Sendai Framework Monitor
  • Voluntary Commitments

Please help us improve PreventionWeb by taking this brief survey. Your input will allow us to better serve the needs of the DRR community.

See the survey

  • Organization directory

Nature Scientific Reports

Scientific Reports is an online, open access journal from the publishers of Nature. It publishes scientifically valid primary research from all areas of the natural and clinical sciences.

The 2016 journal metrics for Scientific Reports are as follows:

  • 2-year impact factor: 4.259
  • 5-year impact factor: 4.847
  • Immediacy index: 0.647
  • Eigenfactor ® score: 0.38761 
  • Article influence score: 1.482
  • 2-year median: 3

The Sendai Framework Voluntary Commitments (SFVC) online platform allows stakeholders to inform the public about their work on DRR. The SFVC online platform is a useful toolto know who is doing what and where for the implementation of the Sendai Framework, which could foster potential collaboration among stakeholders. All stakeholders (private sector, civil society organizations, academia, media, local governments, etc.) working on DRR can submit their commitments and report on their progress and deliverables.

Extreme fire weather in Chile driven by climate change and El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)

A new method to compile global multi-hazard event sets, customisable it tool for on‑field assessments to support disaster management, hurricane risk assessment in a multi-hazard context for dominica in the caribbean, perception, experience and resilience to risks: a global analysis, integrated flood risk assessment of properties and associated population at county scale for nebraska, usa, multi-hazard exposure mapping under climate crisis using random forest algorithm for the kalimantan islands, indonesia, machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability, contact information, is this page useful.

Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window) .

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • My Account Login
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 February 2024

Abiotic factors impact on oak forest decline in Lorestan Province, Western Iran

  • Saeed Mehri 1 ,
  • Ali Asghar Alesheikh 1 &
  • Aynaz Lotfata 2  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  3973 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

106 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

  • Climate sciences
  • Environmental sciences

The Zagros oak forests in Iran are facing a concerning decline due to prolonged and severe drought conditions over several decades, compounded by the simultaneous impact of temperature on oak populations. This study in oak woodlands of central Zagros forests in Lorestan province analyzed abiotic factors such as climate properties, topographic features, land use, and soil properties from 1958 to 2022. We found that higher elevation areas with steeper slopes and diverse topography show significant potential for enhancing oak tree resilience in the face of climate change. Additionally, traditional land use practices like livestock keeping and dryland farming contribute to a widespread decline in oak populations. Preserving forest biodiversity and ensuring ecological sustainability requires immediate attention. Implementing effective land-use management strategies, such as protecting and regulating human-forest interaction, and considering meteorological factors to address this issue is crucial. Collaborative efforts from stakeholders, policymakers, and local communities are essential to oppose destructive suburban sprawl and other developments. Sustainable forestry practices should be implemented to improve the living standards of local communities that rely on forests and traditional livestock keeping, offer forestry-related jobs, and ensure social security. Such efforts are necessary to promote conservation awareness and sustainable practices, safeguarding this unique and vital ecosystem for future generations.

Introduction

Forests are the most widely distributed terrestrial vegetation type, and as such, they play a significant role in providing the environmental context for regional and global ecosystems 1 , 2 . Tree mortality and forest degradation have increased globally during the last few decades. Forest trees are routinely exposed to a wide range of biotic, e.g., fungal infections 3 , 4 , borer beetles 5 , and green oak tortrix 6 and abiotic, e.g., extreme climate conditions 7 , 8 , soil degradation 9 , and topography 10 . These stressors vary in intensity and duration and often occur concurrently or rapidly 11 , 12 , subjecting forest trees to a constant and diverse range of challenges. Abiotic factors have the potential to amplify the impact of concurrent biotic stress on forest trees, either through direct physiological interactions or by triggering disease outbreaks, ultimately leading to tree decline 13 . With rising temperatures and shifting weather patterns, forests face numerous challenges like deforestation, degradation, and stunted growth 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 . These factors, influenced by climate change, undermine the forests’ capacity to serve as crucial carbon sinks 18 .

Droughts profoundly impact trees, leading to considerable stress and an increased risk of tree mortality 17 . During severe drought conditions, the normal functioning of plant cells may be compromised, disrupting the dynamics of both primary and secondary metabolism. Consequently, the trees may experience a reduction in their defense capacity, making them more susceptible to pests and pathogens. The impairment of plant cell functioning under severe drought can weaken the trees’ ability to effectively ward off diseases, further exacerbating their vulnerability to biotic stressors 19 , 20 , 21 . Oak decline is a multifactorial event influenced by several biotic and abiotic (e.g., climate changes and drought) acting in time and space 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 .

López-Sánchez et al. 14 , Brown et al. 26 , Hernández-Lambraño et al. 15 , and Macháčová et al. 27 indicated that climate extremes, e.g., summer drought, precipitation deficit, and high temperatures are the primary causes of oak mortality. Also, there is a complex interplay between climatic parameters and various biotic stressors, highlighting the multifaceted nature of oak decline and the need for targeted conservation efforts to mitigate its adverse effects 26 . Furthermore, Hernández-Lambraño et al. 15 and Crocker et al. 28 indicated the risk of oak decline is exceptionally high in mid and upper slopes, south-facing aspects with high solar radiation, and steep convex slope segments with a dry soil moisture regime.

Soil is considered the most important component of forests as it provides minerals and nutrients for plants, and its physical and chemical properties play a crucial role in oak growth 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 . Soil sand, silt, and density are important physical properties that affect soil fertility and productivity 33 . Soil physical properties determine the ease of root penetration, water availability and the ease of water absorption by plants, the amount of oxygen and other gases in the soil, and the degree to which water moves both laterally and vertically through the soil. Soil physical properties also influence the natural distribution of forest tree species, growth, and forest biomass production 34 .

The chemical properties of forest soils are also important for oak forest growth 35 . Important indices of the chemical behavior of all soils are pH, cation-exchange capacity (CEC), Nitrogen, Calcium, Magnesium, Sodium, Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), anion-exchange capacity (AEC), base saturation (BS) percentage, exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), electrical conductivity, and redox potential 33 , 35 . Like other oak-dominated woodlands worldwide 10 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 36 , 37 , the Zagros oak forests of Iran have one of the most alarming decline trends 4 , 37 , 38 . The Zagros forests cover a large area of the Zagros Mountains ranges, stretching from the northwest to the south of Iran (Fig.  1 ). Oak, with a diverse range of species, is the dominant genus in this region 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 . With an average length and width of 1300 and 200 km, respectively 42 . The Zagros forests cover approximately six million hectares, representing almost 44% of the Iranian forest cover 43 . This is the most significant forest habitat of Iran, distributed across ten provinces of the country, including West Azerbaijan, Kurdistan, Kermanshah, Lorestan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtyari, Kohgiluyeh, and Boyerahmad, Ilam, Khuzestan, Esfahan, and Fars 38 , 44 . These forests have a Mediterranean climate characterized by warm to hot, dry summers and cold or mild moist winters 16 .

figure 1

Location of oak woodlands of Zagros forests and study area (Lorestan province), overlaying on National Geographic Style Map in Esri ArcGIS (version 10.8) 45 .

The Zagros forests are dominated by various oak species, creating a diverse ecosystem across the region 39 , 46 . These oaks are typically classified according to the morphology of their leaves and acorns 38 . According to the classification system of Panahi 47 and Panahi et al. 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , oaks of the Zagros forests are classified as Quercus but in two sections, Quercus and Cerris , in two groups of lobed-leaved oaks and dentate-leaved oaks. Although most of Lorestan’s oak forests are covered with Persian Oak ( Quercus brantii ) 52 , 53 , 54 , other oak species and their distribution in Loerstan are 38 :

Lobed-leaved oaks (subgenus Quercus , section Quercus ):

Aleppo oak ( Q. infectoria subsp. boissieri var. boissieri )

Aleppo oak ( Q. infectoria subsp. boissieri var. pfaeffingeri )

Dentate-leaved oaks (subgenus Quercus , section Cerris )

Brant’s oak ( Q. brantii var. brantii )

Brant’s oak ( Q. brantii var. belangeri )

Persian oak ( Quercus brantii Lindl. subsp. persica )

Persian Oak ( Quercus brantii ) is the dominant species in the region as it has more acorn production compared to other species like Alepo oak ( Quercus infectoria ) 55 , 56 , 57 . Furthermore, it is more resilient and tolerant than these other oak species, and its geographic distribution is not limited by elevation or aspect; it is found at various aspects and elevations 58 , 59 . In addition, it is a low-demanding tree and can grow in different soils. The texture of the soils in Persian Oak habitats varies from clay to clay-loam, and the soil pH ranges between 7.5 and 8.1 60 . The Persian oak is commonly found at lower and mid-elevations, typically between 1000 and 2000 m 61 . Still, the optimal site conditions in the central Zagros are on south-western slopes between 1800 and 2000 m 42 , 60 .

Moreover, Zagros oak forests are most important in terms of water supply, soil conservation, climate change, and the socioeconomic balance of the entire country 9 , 62 . Seven first-grade rivers of Iran, carrying about 34.5 billion cubic meters of water, accounting for 45% of the country's groundwater, rise from this region and flow into the fertile plains 38 , 63 . Therefore, the existence of these water resources is directly dependent upon these oak forests. High ecological potential, especially the possession of rich water supplies, has resulted in a high population density in the region.

In the context of Zagros oak forests in Lorestan, Taghimollaei 64 reported that soil erosion by wind and water continues to be a fundamental problem in the region, often due to inappropriate cultivation methods and heavy grazing pressure in specific areas. Climatic changes will likely result in greater extremes of drought conditions, which may affect the low-rainfall regions more severely than those with moderate rainfall. Using satellite imagery, Alirezaee et al. 40 showed that drought stress is the leading cause of oak mortality in Lorestan province. Pilehvar et al. 65 reported that in the oak woodlands of Lorestan province, oak growth is correlated with altitude, slope, geographical aspects, and the amount of soil organic matter. Badehian et al. 52 reported oak decline in Lorestan province changed the number of secondary compounds, e.g., total tannin and insoluble sugar in leaves of Presian oak ( Quercus brantii ). Shiravand et al. 66 showed that from 2000 to 2017, more than 1.7% (42,802 hectares) of oak forests of Lorestan province completely declined.

After 10 years of investigation, Akhtari et al. 67 reported that the spatial patterns of Persian oak ( Quercus brantii ) in the declined areas of Lorestan’s forests have a clustered distribution. Also, the mean density decreased in declined regions and increased in the non-declined area during 10 years. In addition, there was a significant difference between the tree density and canopy percentage in the regions with and without decline. Shiravand et al. 68 reported that decline indices had an increasing trend in the oak forests of Lorestan province. Also, there is a growing trend in most decline indices with short-term cycles of 2–4 years of fluctuations on drying indices. Similarly, Shiranvand and Hosseini 44 , using satellite imagery and Geographic Information System (GIS) capabilities, analyzed the oak forests in Lorestan province and showed that land use type and climate factors significantly affect the oak decline.

Early symptoms of oak decline in Zagros oak forests were reported by local experts in 2008 4 . Charcoal canker and Obolarina persica , fungal diseases, and various pests, such as borer beetles and the green oak tortrix, are the primary causal agents responsible for oak decline 4 , 5 , 69 . The common charcoal canker agents are Biscogniauxia species , such as Biscogniauxia mediterranea 3 , 4 , 70 and Biscogniauxia rosacearum 37 , 71 . Pathogens of this type have always been regarded as secondary fungal invaders that attack only stressed or old trees 23 , 71 . Endophytes live in all of the aerial organs of oak trees (rarely in the leaves), causing no symptoms during its latent phase 72 . This pathogen, however, acts as an opportunistic in conditions of weakened hosts due to abiotic or biotic factors such as prolonged droughts 72 , 73 . However, there is no consensus regarding how pathogenicity and climate stress interact. Despite some studies suggesting that stress caused by abiotic factors, e.g., drought stress, can increase pathogenicity 18 , 23 , 74 , 75 , others have indicated that these factors reduce the risk of pathogen damage 76 . Consequently, the comprehensive evaluation of abiotic factors in oak decline is still in its early stages of development.

Despite numerous studies on oak decline in the Zagros oak forests 4 , 23 , 37 , 64 , 65 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , a significant knowledge gap persists concerning the comprehensive evaluation of abiotic factors. Specifically, there is a pressing need for studies primarily focusing on the decline in areas with varying topographic characteristics. Such research would substantially contribute to the existing body of knowledge and offer valuable insights for effective conservation and management strategies in these forest ecosystems.

This study aims to deepen our understanding of oak decline in central Zagros forests in Lorestan province and its relationship with abiotic factors such as climate properties, soil properties, topographic features, and land use. By focusing on these factors, the research seeks to elucidate how they influence the response of forests to climate variability. Furthermore, identifying the temporal behavior of abiotic stress, especially in near real-time, is vital in providing a foundation for effective management and conservation strategies in changing environmental conditions.

Material and methods

Lorestan’s oak forests cover approximately 1.23 million hectares (Fig.  1 ). Oak woodlands in Lorestan province cover a latitude range of 32°42.96′N to 34°10.79′N and a longitude range of 46°50.36′E to 50°1.19′E. The primary economic activities in this region revolve around livestock and dryland farming 82 . According to official statistics, the Lorestan province has experienced a high increase in livestock keeping. The number of livestock (sum of both small and large livestock) increased from 23,427 in 1971 83 to 2,191,586 in 2017 84 . In addition, the rainfed farming area in 1979 was 2382 hectares 83 , which increased to 598,078 hectares in 2017 84 .

In Lorestan province, the Zagros oak forests stretch between 341 and 3450 m above sea level. The region receives rain and snowfall primarily due to fronts originating from the Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea, and northern Europe, occasionally impacting this area. Precipitation generally decreases from north to south and from west to east. Most of the rainfall occurs during the winter season, with an average ranging between 400 and 800 mm. According to 85 , approximately 70% of the annual rainfall occurs during the latter half of the year. Moreover, the annual mean temperature in this area varies between 9 and 25 °C, depending on the latitude and altitude.

Eight datasets are used in this paper. First, the oak decline dataset was provided by Iran's Forests, Range, and Watershed Management Organization in 2015 9 . In this dataset, oak forests are classified into five regions based on the number of declined trees (Table 1 and Fig.  2 ).

figure 2

Classification of the study area based on the percentage of declined trees, overlaying on the World Hillshade base map in Esri ArcGIS (version 10.8) 45 .

Second , the elevation dataset is derived from the SRTM 90 m Digital Elevation Model (DEM), available worldwide with a spatial resolution of 90 m 86 , 87 . To focus on the specific oak decline regions described earlier, the global dataset was clipped accordingly using ArcGIS’s Extract by Mask toolbox 88 . Subsequently, slope datasets were generated for each decline region at a spatial resolution of 90 m by applying the slope function of ArcGIS software to the elevation dataset 89 .

Third, a topographic diversity dataset provides insight into the extent of ecological niches and microhabitats accessible to various species 90 . A description of the topographic diversity index is provided in Appendix A . The data was collected by Conservation Science Partners and is available for free through the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform 91 . The dataset provides global coverage at a spatial resolution of 270 m.

Fourth, the maximum and minimum temperatures used in this study were derived from TerraClimate, a dataset provided by the University of California Merced 92 , 93 . This dataset employs climatologically assisted interpolation and combines high-resolution climatological normals from various sources, including the WorldClim dataset. The TerraClim dataset, available through GEE (Google Earth Engine), provides a global dataset with 768 monthly observations at a spatial resolution of 4638.3 m. We computed the monthly average maximum and minimum temperatures to establish a time series for each oak decline region. As a result, a comprehensive time series was generated for each region, presenting the average monthly values of maximum and minimum temperatures spanning from 1958 to 2022.

Fifth, the wind speed dataset from the University of California Merced covers 1958 to 2022 with a monthly temporal resolution. The dataset has a spatial resolution of 4638.3 m 92 , 93 . To analyze the wind speed in each oak decline region, we computed the average monthly wind speed individually, resulting in distinct wind speed time series for each region. These time series span from 1958 to 2022, comprising 768 monthly observations for each region’s wind speed.

Six monthly datasets of evapotranspiration and precipitation were provided by the University of California Merced from 1958 to 2022 at a spatial resolution of 4638.3 m 92 , 93 . These datasets were processed to align with the boundary of each oak decline region, and subsequent calculations were performed to generate average monthly values. As a result, a time series comprising 768 values was obtained for each region, capturing the temporal variations of evapotranspiration and precipitation over the specified period.

Seven, the Palmer Drought Severity Index ( PDSI ) dataset , which also comes from the University of California Merced with monthly temporal resolution 92 , 93 . The PDSI is one of the most widely used drought indicators addressing two of the most challenging aspects of drought: the intensity of the drought and its beginning and end times 94 . The PDSI index is described in Appendix C . With a spatial resolution of 4638.3 m, the dataset provides global coverage of monthly values from 1958 to 2022. For each region, average monthly values of PDSI are calculated. Consequently, a time series of 768 monthly PDSsI values is created for each region.

Eight, the land use dataset of 2010, which is provided by online repositories 95 . The dataset has a 1:25,000 scale. The primary land use classes include forests, dry farming lands, and urban areas (Fig.  3 ). Moreover, the dataset classifies forests according to the density of trees into dense, medium, and low forests.

figure 3

Primary land use classes in the study area, overlaying on the World Hillshade base map in Esri ArcGIS (version 10.8) 45 .

Eight, soil physical and chemical properties , coming from SoilGrids, produce maps of soil properties globally at an average spatial resolution of 250 m using machine learning methods 96 , 97 . Sand, silt, and density (Fig.  4 ) as physical and CEC, Nitrogen, and SOC (Fig.  5 ) as chemical properties were processed aligning with the boundary of each oak decline region.

figure 4

Soil physical properties, Bulk density ( a ), Clay ( b ), Sand ( c ), and Silt ( d ), overlaying on National Geographic Style Map in Esri ArcGIS (version 10.8) 45 .

figure 5

Soil chemical properties, SOC ( a ), CEC ( b ), Nitrogen ( c ), and pH, overlaying on National Geographic Style Map in Esri ArcGIS (version 10.8) 45 .

The oak decline dataset divides the study area into five regions based on each region’s declined tree percentage. Considering these decline regions, we analyze abiotic factors, such as topographic features, land use classes, and long-term drought and metrological factors. The goal is determining which factor significantly affects each region’s oak decline.

Time series analysis

To decipher time-series data, this paper uses A Bayesian Estimator of Abrupt change, Seasonal change, and Trend (BEAST) 98 . A description of the BEAST method is provided in Appendix B . Furthermore, to identify hotspots in drought time series, i.e., periods with more than 25% severe and/or extreme drought, the changing points of the trend model are analyzed. This identifies points in which the overall behavior of drought is changed. Then, aggregating drought conditions between these changing points according to PDSI categories (Appendix C , Table C1 ) will identify more extended periods with each region's severe drought condition.

Metrological factors

The oak decline can be exacerbated by a precipitation deficit 27 . Therefore, this paper calculates the area under the precipitation graph to determine the total precipitation received by each region using a trapezoidal rule (Appendix D ) 99 . Further, linear trends in metrological data are calculated to understand better the long-term behavior of the parameters and their probable future behavior. Linear trend estimation is a statistical technique to model the functional relationship between two or more parameters 100 . A description of the linear trend model is provided in Appendix E .

Topographical factors

Topography plays a crucial role in influencing the resilience of oak trees to climate change 10 , 15 . Consequently, this paper compares topographic features, such as elevation and slope, of regions with different decline percentages to determine how topography influences oak decline in the region. Thus, the frequency of elevation and slope of five decline regions, summarized in Table 1 , are evaluated. This will provide an approximate representation of the distribution of the parameters 101 .

To calculate the frequency of elevation (and slope), the study area's elevation range (slope range) is divided into disjoint and equal intervals. The frequency is determined by counting the number of values within each interval. Also, the area of the regions is not equal, and frequencies are affected by the region’s size (Table 1 ). To remove the area effect from frequencies, they are normalizing using Eq. ( 1 ).

where the f i is the frequency of the i-th interval, and the \({\sum }_{i=1}^{n}{f}_{i}\) is the sum of frequencies of all intervals. The area effect is removed by normalizing frequencies.

PDSI time series findings

Table 2 illustrates variations in drought conditions among regions from 1958 to 2022, with drought classes outlined in Appendix C , Table C1 . Notably, Region 1 exhibited more favorable weather conditions compared to the other regions, with 58.5% of the duration falling within the normal and above-normal drought classes. Conversely, Region 5 faced the most severe drought conditions throughout the study period (1958–2022). Region 5 experienced droughts for 46.6% of the time, marking the highest drought occurrence among all regions.

Furthermore, the PDSI time series of five decline zones is decomposed using the BEAST method. Figure  4 a shows the decomposed PDSI time series of Region 1, which indicates that the PDSI time series of Region 1 has seasonal and trend components with no outliers. So, the fitted model matches Appendix B , Equation B1 . In addition, the PDSI time series of Region 1 has a harmonic seasonal component with 80 months and ten changepoints with 99.9% probability. Furthermore, the trend component has seven changing points with a 33.2% probability. Changing points are shown with vertical black lines (Fig.  6 ). In September 1967, with 95% probability, the first change point in the trend component of Region one’s PDSI occurred, creating a 3.02 increase in PDSI value, with the highest variation in trend change points. Although the PDSI had positive values from September 1967 to January 1996, indicating normal and wet drought conditions (Table C1), it has a negative trend. This negative trend lasts until June 2014.

figure 6

BEAST decomposition and changepoint detection of PDSI time series of Region 1 ( a ), Region 2 ( b ), Region 3 ( c ), Region 4 ( d ), and Region 5 ( e ); the black dots show the PDSI observations, Season is a piecewise harmonic model fitted to the seasonal component, Trend is fitted piecewise linear function, showing the trend of data, seasonal and trend changepoints are denoted by vertical black bars, and Error is the noise of decomposition process. Graphs are drawn using a Python package, Rbeast (version 0.1.14) 98 , 102 .

In Region 2, the PDSI has harmonic seasonal and trend components, as illustrated in Fig.  6 b. So, the fitted model is ‘ Y  =  Trend  +  Season  +  Error ’. The seasonal components have ten changing points with a 99.9% probability. Also, the PDSI of Region 2 has 28 monthly seasonal components. Furthermore, a trend component has ten changing points with a 99.4% probability. All changing points are illustrated by black vertical lines in Fig.  5 . The most significant change point in trend components happened in September 2018, which increased the PDSI value by 10.48.

The fitted model for the PDSI time series of Region 3 has seasonal and trend components (Fig.  6 c). The fitted harmonic component has 37 month period. There is a 99.6% probability that the seasonal component has ten changing points. In addition, with a 97.4% probability, the trend components. In Region 3, in February 2018, the trend component had a significant change point, increasing the PDSI value by 4.78.

Also, the PDSI time series of Region 4 has seasonal and trend components (Fig.  6 d). The harmonic model with a 37-month period is fitted to the periodic (seasonal) component. With a 99.9% probability, the fitted harmonic model for the seasonal component has ten change points. The trend component also has ten changing points. These points were identified with a 99.8% probability. The last change point with increasing PDSI by 6.85 was in January 2018.

Finally, Region Five’s PDSI time series also has trend and seasonal components (Fig.  6 e). Its harmonic seasonal component has 36 month period. Ten change points were identified for the seasonal component with a 99.8% probability. The trend component showed ten change points with a 99.3% probability. Furthermore, in April 2018, there was a significant change in the trend model. This change point increased PDSI by 4.66.

The analysis of the drought time series reveals four significant trend changes on specific dates: March 1968, November 1996, October 2018, and December 2020. These dates divide the study period (1958–2022) into five stages labeled S1 to S5 on the PDSI time series (Figs.  7 and 8 ). These trend changes indicate changes in drought behavior. Therefore, the drought behavior of each period (S1 to S5) is examined according to PDSI classification (Table C1).

figure 7

Time series of PDSI in decline regions: ( a ) Region 1, ( b ) Region 2, ( c ) Region 3, ( d ) Region 4, and ( e ) Region 5; The Altair, an interactive statistical visualization for Python (version 5.0.1), is used to draw graphs 103 .

figure 8

Time series of maximum ( a ), minimum ( b ) temperature, and wind speed ( c ) from 1958 to 2022; the Matplotlib for Python (version 3.7.2) is used to draw graphs 104 .

During the S1 (June 1958 to March 1968), all regions experienced moderate to extreme drought (Table 3 ). Furthermore, less than 1% of the study area was characterized by a moderately wet climate. During these years, oak trees have been subjected to multiple drought stresses.

According to PDSI classification (Table C1), a near normal and wet climate (moderate, very, and extremely wet climate) was experienced in all regions during the S2 (April 1968 to November 1996). None of the five regions experienced extreme drought, while more than 80% of the regions fell into the normal and wet categories (Table 4 ). Additionally, 7.4% and 9.7% of this stage were extremely and very wet, respectively. Although better climate conditions provide a more favorable environment for forest growth, there were multiple drought stresses.

In S3 (December 1996 to October 2018), the study area faced drought. Only 27% of these 22 years had normal drought conditions. Furthermore, PDSI values indicate that in less than 1% of this period, oak forests had wet conditions (Table 5 ).

In S4 (November 2018 to December 2020), all regions experienced normal to extremely wet conditions, which means 60% of this period was wet, and the remaining were normal. Additionally, region 5 had better climate conditions than the other regions, with 69.23% of the duration being wet and 38.46% being extremely wet. However, in the S5 (January to December 2021), the drought condition completely changed, and 75.38% of the S5 period, the study area had an extreme drought.

Metrological factors findings

The time series of maximum temperatures indicated that regions 4 and 5 had faced higher maximum temperatures in all months of the observation period (Fig.  8 a). In contrast, region one experienced lower maximum temperature. Moreover, all regions showed an upward trend, indicating maximum temperatures increased from 1958 to 2022.

The minimum temperature time series indicates that Region 1 has a lower minimum temperature than other regions (Fig.  8 b). However, region 5 experienced a higher minimum temperature than other regions. Additionally, all regions' minimum temperature time series have shown increasing trends during the observation period.

On the other hand, Regions 5 and 4 experienced higher wind speeds, while Regions 1 and 2 experienced lower winds (Fig.  8 c). Furthermore, all regions demonstrated an increasing wind speed trend over the study period.

The area of the regions is not equal (Table 1 ), and measurements are affected by the regions' size. Measurements are normalized to remove the area effect. Then, an area under the graph time series of normalized accumulated precipitation (Fig.  9 a) and evapotranspiration (Fig.  9 b) is calculated (Table 6 ). Results indicate that Region 4 had more accumulated precipitation from 1958 to 2022 (Table 6 ). However, Region 1 had the lowest accumulated precipitation. In addition, the evapotranspiration of Region 5 is more than other regions. Meaning that although this region received more precipitation, it had higher evapotranspiration.

figure 9

Normalized accumulated precipitation ( a ) and evapotranspiration ( b ) of five study regions from 1958 to 2022; the Matplotlib for Python (version 3.7.2) is used to draw graphs 104 .

Topography findings

The normalized frequency of elevation in oak forests shows that Region 1 has the highest elevation in the study area, with most parts exceeding an altitude of 1500 m (Fig.  10 a). This means high elevation positively affects oak forests’ resilience to the decline phenomenon. Moreover, most parts of Region 1 have slopes greater than 15%, which indicates that this region has steeper slopes than the other regions (Fig.  10 b).

figure 10

Normalized frequency of elevation ( a ) and slope ( b ) in the study regions , the Matplotlib for Python (version 3.7.2) is used to draw graphs 104 .

Region 1 exhibits a distinct advantage in terms of topography, providing more favorable temperature and moisture conditions for oak growth compared to the other regions. This distinction highlights a significant disparity in topographic diversity between Region 1 and the remaining regions (Fig.  11 ). The unique topographic features of Region 1 likely play a crucial role in creating a conducive environment for oak development.

figure 11

Regarding the frequency of topographic diversity in decline zones, the Matplotlib for Python (version 3.7.2) is used to draw graphs 104 .

Landuse findings

Most declining trees are concentrated in areas adjacent to dry farming lands (Fig.  12 ). Notably, the regions with the longest shared border with arid farming zones were identified as Regions 5 and 4. These findings underscore the potential influence of land use patterns, particularly the proximity to dry farming areas, on the occurrence and extent of oak decline within the study area.

figure 12

Overlay of dry farming lands with decline zones in Zagros oak forests of Lorestan province, overlaying on World Hillshade base map in Esri ArcGIS (version 10.8) 45 .

Soil data analysis findings

The physical and chemical characteristics of soil in the study area are summarized (Table 7 ). The soil has a high bulk density in most parts of Regions 3, 4, and 5 (Fig.  4 a). In contrast, Region 1 has the lightest soil bulk density, with a mean density of 136.9 g/cm 3 (Table 7 ). This means that high bulk density negatively affects oak trees and can increase oak decline.

According to the clay map (Fig.  4 b), most parts of Regions 1 and 2 have clay soils. These two regions have about 30% more clay than other regions. This highlights the positive effects of clay soil on oak tree growth as these two regions have lower decline rates than others.

Regarding sand, Region 5 has the most sandy soil, with a mean of 269.3 g/kg of sand. Also, the southern parts of the whole study area have more sand than the northern parts (Fig.  4 c). This underscores the potential side effects of sandy soils in oak decline. Region 2 exhibited the highest silt (434.2 g/kg), while Region 5 had less silt than others. Also, the north and northeast of the study area have more silt (Fig.  4 d).

Analysis of soil’s chemical properties indicates that soils of Region 1 and 2 have the highest amount of SOC (Table 8 ), underscoring the positive effects of SOC in oak growth. In the case of soil’s CEC, all regions seem to have an acceptable amount of CEC. Also, Region 5 has a better condition with the highest mean CEC (317.7 mmol(c)/kg) than the others.

In addition, Region 1 has the most significant amount of nitrogen, with a mean of 179.5 cg/kg. Most parts of this region (Fig.  5 c) have more than 148.8 cg/kg of nitrogen. Region 2 also has a high amount of nitrogen, while the soil in Regions 3 and 5 has less nitrogen.

Almost all study areas have a pH ranging from 7.4 to 8.8 (Table 8 ). Such a pH range is considered alkaline pH and is suitable for the availability of most nutrients to the roots 105 . Regarding soil chemistry, the most suitable pH range for root growth development is 6–7.5 106 . The center and north part of the study area have a more significant pH, while the south of the study area has a lower pH, which is more suitable for oak growth (Fig.  5 d).

Drought is one of the leading causes of oak decline in the study area. Analyzing long-term drought data (64 years from 1958 to 2022) indicated that drought can significantly contribute to oak decline. Aligning with this finding, López-Sánchez et al. 14 , Capretti and Battisti 107 , and Macháčová et al. 27 have identified drought as the leading cause of oak seedlings’ mortality. In the context of Zagros oak forests, aligning with our finding, Mahdavi et al. 108 , Ghanbary et al. 79 , Zolfaghari et al. 109 , and Jafarnia et al. 110 found that drought is one of the leading causes of oak decline causes by increasing the aggressiveness of fungi and intensification of their destructive effects, making oaks oak seedlings more vulnerable to abiotic stressors.

The findings show that the overall trend of the PDSI data is negative, indicating that the region is facing more severe drought conditions towards the end of the study period according to PDSI classification (Table C1). This is aligned with the findings of Nazaripour et al. 111 , who reported that the frequency of more severe droughts has increased between 10 and 20 percent.

We found that droughts with 36 and 37-month seasonal periods can significantly contribute on oak decline. Because in regions 3, 4, and 5 where more than 25% of oaks are declined, we observed a 36 and 37-month seasonal components in drought time series. This is aligned with the findings of Safari et al. 112 , showing a more robust growth–drought association between 36- and 48-months of drought, which is aligned with our finding.

In addition, results showed that the region’s annual precipitation has decreased over the study period. We have discovered that adverse weather conditions, including increased temperatures, annual precipitation deficits, and high wind speeds, worsen oak decline in the study area. These conditions could also intensify biotic stresses. Notably, Region 5, characterized by such unfavorable weather conditions, exhibited a higher percentage of oak tree decline. Also, all these factors, temperatures, annual precipitation shortage, and wind speed, have negative trends during the study period (1958–2022). Aligning with this, Attarod et al. 113 , Barani and Karami 114 , Mahdavi et al. 108 , Rostamian et al. 115 , Safari et al. 112 , Poursartip et al. 116 , Henriques et al. 117 , Ghanbary et al. 54 , and Shiranvand and Hosseini 44 highlighted effects of adverse weather conditions, e.g., decrease in precipitation, increase in evapotranspiration, temperature, and wind speed contributes to oak decline by facilitating transmission of some biotic factors, e.g., fungal, modifying the biochemical processes of trees, weakening and making them more vulnerable to biotic factors.

Our findings show that topographic factors, i.e., higher elevation, slope, and topographic diversity, enhance oak resilience against climate change. On the contrary, Dezfoli et al. 118 reported divergent results. They found that slope does not significantly impact the oak decline rate. However, they observed higher oak decline in higher elevations. About 76% of their study has less than a 15% slope with little variability. On the other hand, the Zagros oak forest falls into a wide range of slopes, as shown in Fig.  10 b. Hence, the findings of Dezfoli et al. 118 are influenced by their choice of the study area. Thus, it becomes apparent that a more extensive study area should be considered when investigating complex phenomena like oak decline.

We have found that the proximity of oak woodlands to specific land use classes, such as dryland farming, plays a crucial role as an amplifier of oak decline. Regions 4 and 5, which encompass dryland farming areas, showcase a higher number of declined trees. These land use classes have direct and indirect effects on exacerbating oak decline. The direct impact involves the destruction of acorns and young seedlings due to plowing activities in rainfed farming and livestock grazing. Indirect intensification of the oak decline stems from an increase in human-forest interactions. In alignment with this finding, Pourhashemi 119 , Shiranvand and Hosseini 44 , Pourhashemi et al. 120 , Safari et al. 112 , Ghanbari Motlagh et al. 121 , Karami et al. 122 , Mausolf et al. 123 , and Soleymani et al. 124 emphasized the importance of land use in vicinity of oak woodlands. They indicated that some land use classes, e.g., livestock grazing, fuel production, farming, and tourism activities, partially influenced the oak trees' sensitivity to biotic and abiotic extremes.

We have found that soil bulk density affects oak decline, and soils with lower density (Region 1) create a better environment for oak growth because Region 1, having lower bulk density, has fewer declined trees. This is aligned with Kormanek et al. 125 , indicating that soil bulk density significantly impacts the oak’s root system development, total height, and dry mass of the oak seedlings. Specifically, as soil density increased, the root system size decreased, affecting the proper tree development and stability. Even slight increases in soil compaction negatively affected young seedling growth. In contrast, areas characterized by high bulk density are situated adjacent to dry farming lands. Particularly, regions sharing the longest borders with arid farming zones, namely Regions 5 and 4, exhibit the highest bulk density. These findings underscore the potential influence of land use patterns, particularly the proximity to dry farming areas, on the soil bulk density and extent of oak decline within the study area. Aligning with the findings of Panagos et al. 126 , land use acts as the main driver for bulk density variation.

Therefore, sustainable forest management is crucial to address this issue, acknowledging the forest as a socio-ecological system encompassing ecological, social, and cultural aspects. Consequently, multidimensional studies are necessary to control and manage forest ecosystems effectively. Our recommendation for empowering oak forests to regrow, which is essential for ecosystem sustainability, involves assessing oak forest ecosystems from socio-ecological and land use policy management perspectives. This approach aims to identify more equitable and representative options for the sustainable management of the Zagros oak forests.

One potential outcome of conducting comprehensive studies and analyses to understand the effects of abiotic factors on oak decline in the study area could be the recognition that local communities perceive threats to the sustainability of oak forests. These threats may arise from increasing human-forest interactions, land use changes, economic development, and climate change-induced alterations in environmental conditions.

Limitations

This study has a few limitations. First, we did not have access to data on biotic factors, making it essential to investigate the effects of both biotic and abiotic factors in oak decline simultaneously. Second, this paper did not examine uncertainty indices or datasets, which opens the possibility for future research to explore uncertainty by comparing the magnitudes of each source of uncertainty. Moreover, according to Vicente-Serrano et al. 127 , short drought time scales are primarily related to soil water content, while longer time scales are associated with variations in groundwater storage. As this study focuses on a long-term drought in the Zagros oak forests and does not assess groundwater data in the study area, it is recommended for future research to investigate the effects of changes in the groundwater table in the region. Additionally, exploring both spatial and temporal variations of abiotic factors in the Zagros oak forest is recommended to determine large-scale spatial variations of these parameters and their correlation with oak decline.

In addition, the Zagros oak forests consist of the western and southern slopes of the Zagros Mountains, which run from northwest to southeast, from the Turkish border to the Persian Gulf 38 , 128 , 129 , meaning that the climate conditions differ from north to south of Zagros oak forests. In the study, we could not find ground samplings of oak decline in the Zagros region. So, we limited the study area of this research to oak woodlands of central Zagros oak forests located in Lorestan province. Therefore, in a general study, investigating the effects of abiotic factors in the whole part of Zagros oak forest is recommended for future research.

In addition, as dust storms have become frequent in the west of Iran and the probable effects of dust on vegetation 130 , 131 , investigating the effects of air dust on oak decline is recommended for future study. Furthermore, deforestation and forest fires in the region could also be included as abiotic factors for forest decline since the region faces forest fires every summer.

Data availability

Datasets are publicly available via GitHub: https://github.com/smehri/Forest_Monitoring .

Code availability

All Python codes used and/or analyzed during the current study are publicly available via GitHub: https://github.com/smehri/Forest_Monitoring .

Wulder, M. Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 22 , 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339802200402 (1998).

Article   Google Scholar  

Westoby, J. Introduction to World Forestry: People and Their Trees (Basil Blackwell, 1989).

Google Scholar  

Alidadi, A., Kowsari, M., Javan-Nikkhah, M., Jouzani, G. R. S. & Rastaghi, M. E. New pathogenic and endophytic fungal species associated with Persian oak in Iran. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 155 , 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01830-y (2019).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Mir Abolfathi, M. Outbreak of charcoal disease on Quercus spp and Zelkova carpinifolia trees in forests of Zagros and Alborz mountains in Iran. Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 49 , 257–263 (2013).

Rostamian, M., Kavousi, M., Bazgir, E. & Babanejad, M. The relationship between oak charcoal disease ( Biscogniauxia mediterranea ) and borer beetles in the Zagros forests, Khorram Abad. J. Wood For. Sci. Technol. 24 , 110–142 (2017).

Löffler, F. & Fartmann, T. The importance of landscape heterogeneity and vegetation structure for the conservation of the Ortolan Bunting Emberiza hortulana . Bird Conserv. Int. 33 , e55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270923000023 (2023).

Kannenberg, S. A., Schwalm, C. R. & Anderegg, W. R. Ghosts of the past: How drought legacy effects shape forest functioning and carbon cycling. Ecol. Lett. 23 , 891–901 (2020).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Buras, A., Rammig, A. & Zang, C. S. Quantifying impacts of the 2018 drought on European ecosystems in comparison to 2003. Biogeosciences 17 , 1655–1672 (2020).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Kooh Soltani, S., Alesheikh, A. A., Ghermezcheshmeh, B. & Mehri, S. An evaluation of potential Oak decline Forest of the Zagros using GIS, RS, FAHP methods. Iran. J. Ecohydrol. 5 , 713–725. https://doi.org/10.22059/ije.2018.225917.448 (2018).

Ana, L.-B. et al. Topography modulates climate sensitivity of multidecadal trends of holm oak decline. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.09.531879 (2023).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Holopainen, J. K. & Gershenzon, J. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 15 , 176–184 (2010).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Niinemets, Ü. Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from seedlings to mature plants: Past stress history, stress interactions, tolerance and acclimation. For. Ecol. Manag. 260 , 1623–1639 (2010).

Ramegowda, V. & Senthil-Kumar, M. The interactive effects of simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses on plants: Mechanistic understanding from drought and pathogen combination. J. Plant Physiol. 176 , 47–54 (2015).

López-Sánchez, A. et al. Spatio-temporal variation of biotic and abiotic stress agents determines seedling survival in assisted oak regeneration. J. Appl. Ecol. 56 , 2663–2674. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13500 (2019).

Hernández-Lambraño, R. E., de la Cruz, D. R. & Sánchez-Agudo, J. Á. Spatial oak decline models to inform conservation planning in the Central-Western Iberian Peninsula. For. Ecol. Manag. 441 , 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.028 (2019).

Teshome, D. T., Zharare, G. E. & Naidoo, S. The threat of the combined effect of biotic and abiotic stress factors in forestry under a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.601009 (2020).

Venäläinen, A. et al. Climate change induces multiple risks to boreal forests and forestry in Finland: A literature review. Global Change Biol. 26 , 4178–4196. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15183 (2020).

Liu, Q. et al. Drought-induced increase in tree mortality and corresponding decrease in the carbon sink capacity of Canada’s boreal forests from 1970 to 2020. Global Change Biol. 29 , 2274–2285. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16599 (2023).

Hossain, M., Veneklaas, E. J., Hardy, G. E. S. J. & Poot, P. Tree host–pathogen interactions as influenced by drought timing: Linking physiological performance, biochemical defence and disease severity. Tree Physiol. 39 , 6–18 (2019).

Bucci, S. J., Goldstein, G., Scholz, F. G. & Meinzer, F. C. Physiological significance of hydraulic segmentation, nocturnal transpiration and capacitance in tropical trees: Paradigms revisited. Tropical Tree Physiology: Adaptations and Responses in a Changing Environment , 205–225 (2016).

Spruce, J. P., Hicke, J. A., Hargrove, W. W., Grulke, N. E. & Meddens, A. J. Use of MODIS NDVI products to map tree mortality levels in forests affected by mountain pine beetle outbreaks. Forests 10 , 811 (2019).

Sagheb-Talebi, K., Stanturf, J. & Madsen, P. Rehabilitation of temperate forests in Iran. In Restoration of Boreal and Temperate forests 448–460 (CRC Press, 2005).

Ghanbary, E. et al. Drought and pathogen effects on survival, leaf physiology, oxidative damage, and defense in two middle eastern oak species. Forests 12 , 247 (2021).

Mirabolfathy, M., Ju, Y.-M., Hsieh, H.-M. & Rogers, J. D. Obolarina persica sp. nov., associated with dying Quercus in Iran. Mycoscience 54 , 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2012.11.003 (2013).

Mehri, S. & Alesheikh, A. A. An artificial intelligence-based solution for the classification of oak decline potential. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 43B4 , 17–22. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2022-17-2022 (2022).

Brown, N., Vanguelova, E., Parnell, S., Broadmeadow, S. & Denman, S. Predisposition of forests to biotic disturbance: Predicting the distribution of Acute Oak Decline using environmental factors. For. Ecol. Manag. 407 , 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.054 (2018).

Macháčová, M. et al. Oak decline caused by biotic and abiotic factors in Central Europe: A case study from the Czech Republic. Forests 13 , 1223 (2022).

Crocker, E., Gurung, K., Calvert, J., Nelson, C. D. & Yang, J. Integrating GIS, remote sensing, and citizen science to map oak decline risk across the Daniel Boone National Forest. Remote Sens. 15 , 2250 (2023).

Dong, H., Ghalehno, M. D., Bahmani, M., Ardestani, E. G. & Fathi, L. Influence of soil physicochemical properties on biometrical and physical features of Persian oak wood. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología 25 (2023).

Brady, N. C., Weil, R. R. & Weil, R. R. The Nature and Properties of Soils Vol. 13 (Prentice Hall, 2008).

Marinari, S., Mancinelli, R., Campiglia, E. & Grego, S. Chemical and biological indicators of soil quality in organic and conventional farming systems in Central Italy. Ecol. Indic. 6 , 701–711 (2006).

Chabrillat, S., Foerster, S., Steinberg, A. & Segl, K. in 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2914–2917 (IEEE).

Osman, K. T. In Forest Soils: Properties and Management (ed. Osman, K. T.) 45–61 (Springer International Publishing, 2013).

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Osman, K. T. In Forest Soils: Properties and Management (ed. Osman, K. T.) 19–44 (Springer International Publishing, 2013).

Rozas, V. & Sampedro, L. Soil chemical properties and dieback of Quercus robur in Atlantic wet forests after a weather extreme. Plant Soil 373 , 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1835-5 (2013).

Takahashi, M. et al. Air pollution monitoring and tree and forest decline in East Asia: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 742 , 140288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140288 (2020).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Bashiri, S., Abdollahzadeh, J. & Evidente, A. Diagnosing and pathogenicity of Biscogniauxia species, the causal agents of oak charcoal canker and decline in Zagros forests of Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 104 , 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-022-01124-z (2022).

Sagheb-Talebi, K., Pourhashemi, M. & Sajedi, T. Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, a Hope for the Future (Springer, 2014).

Book   Google Scholar  

S̲ābitī, H. Forests, Trees, and Shrubs of Iran (Publication of Ministry of Information. and Tourism, 1976).

Alirezaee, Z., Gandomkar, A., Khodagholi, M. & Abasi, A. R. Spatiotemporal dynamics of oak forest of Zagros in response to drought case study: Oak forest of Lorestan. Iran. J. For. Range Prot. Res. 17 , 107–123. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijfrpr.2019.119997 (2019).

Jazirehi, M. & Ebrahimi Rostaghi, M. (University of Tehran Press, Tehran, 2003).

Talebi, M., Sagheb-Talebi, K. & Jahanbazi, H. Site demands and some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Persian Oak ( Quercus brantii Lindl.) in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province (western Iran). Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 14 , 79–67 (2006).

Attarod, P. et al. Meteorological parameters and evapotranspiration affecting the Zagros forests decline in Lorestan province. Iran. J. For. Range Prot. Res. 13 , 97–112 (2016).

Shiranvand, H. & Hosseini, S. A. An analysis of dieback areas of Zagros oak forests using remote sensing data case study: Lorestan oak forest, Iran. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 6 , 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00722-z (2020).

Esri. Working with basemap layers . https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/map/working-with-layers/working-with-basemap-layers.htm (2018).

Djavanchir Khoie, K. Les chênes de LIran [PhD thesis] (Montpellier University, 1967).

Panahi, P. A study on the diversity of oak species in Iran using leaf and pollen micromorphology and determination of their conservation status , Ph. D. Dissertation (University of Mazandaran, 2011) (in Persian) .

Panahi, P., Jamzad, Z., Pourmajidian, M. R., Fallah, A. & Pourhashemi, M. Foliar epidermis morphology in Quercus (subgenus Quercus , section Quercus ) in Iran. Acta Bot. Croat. 71 , 95–113 (2012).

Panahi, P., Jamzad, Z., Pourmajidian, M. R., Fallah, A. & Pourhashemi, M. Taxonomic implications of micro-morphological features for taxon delimitation within the Quercus libani complex (Fagaceae) in Iran. Phytol. Balc. 18 , 263–276 (2012).

Panahi, P. et al. Taxonomic revision of the Quercus brantii complex (Fagaceae) in Iran with emphasis on leaf and pollen micromorphology. Acta Bot. Hung. 54 , 355–375 (2012).

Panahi, P., Pourmajidian, M. R. & Pourhashemi, M. Pollen morphology of Quercus (subgenus Quercus , section Quercus ) in Iran and its systematic implication. Acta Soc. Bot. Polon. 81 (2012).

Badehian, Z., Mehdi Karami, S., Rashidi, M. & Rajabi, M. Effect of the oak decline on the secondary compositions in oak leave Case study: Zagros forest-Lorestan. Plant Ecophysiol. ( Arsanjan Branch ) (2018).

Azizi, G., Arsalani, M., Bräuning, A. & Moghimi, E. Precipitation variations in the central Zagros Mountains (Iran) since A.D. 1840 based on oak tree rings. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 386 , 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.05.009 (2013).

Ghanbary, E. et al. Change in biochemical parameters of Persian oak ( Quercus brantii Lindl.) seedlings inoculated by pathogens of charcoal disease under water deficit conditions. Trees 32 , 1595–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1736-6 (2018).

Pourhashemi, M., Zande Basiri, M. & Panahi, P. Estimation of acorn production of gall oak ( Quercus infectoria Olivier) in Baneh forests using Koenig visual method. Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 19 , 205–194 (2011).

Shakeri, Z., Marvi Mohajer, M. R., Etemad, V. & Namiraninan, M. Qualitative investigation of Gall Oak ( Quercus infectoria Oliv.) acorns in untouched and pruned forest stands of Baneh (Kurdistan province, NW Iran). Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 16 , 111–199 (2008).

Pourhashemi, M. Acorn crop estimation of Irans native oaks using different visual surveys and acorn traps (Subproject: Kurdistan Province) (2012).

Fattahi, M. Study of Zagros Forests and the Most Important Degradation Factors (Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 1994) (in Persian) .

Fattahi, M. Distribution of Quercus libani and its typology in Iran (Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 1997).

Bordbar, K. et al. Impact of environmental factors on distribution and some quantitative characteristics of Manna oak ( Quercus brantii Lindl.) in Fars province. Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 18 , 404–390 (2010).

Jazirehei, M. & Ebrahimi, R. (2003).

Ahmadi, R., Kiadaliri, H., Mataji, A. & Kafaki, S. Oak forest decline zonation using AHP model and GIS technique in Zagros Forests of Ilam Province. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. (JBES) 4 , 141–150 (2014).

Taghimollaei, Y. & Karamshahi, A. Sudden oak death in Iran forests. Int. J. For. Soil Eros. 7 , 6–10 (2017).

Taghimollaei, Y. Sudden oak death in Iran forests. Int. J. For. Soil Eros. (IJFSE) 7 , 6–10 (2017).

Pilehvar, B., Jafari Sarabi, H. & Veiskarami, G. H. Plant communities change under different physiographic conditions and soil properties in the central Zagros forests. Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 24 , 414–402 (2016).

Shiravand, H., Khaledi, S., Behzadi, S. & Sanjabi, H. A. Monitoring and assessing the changes in the coverage and decline of oak forests in Lorestan province using satellite images and BFAST model. J. Appl. Res. Geogr. Sci. 20 , 265–280. https://doi.org/10.29252/jgs.20.57.265 (2020).

Akhtari, M. H., Mataji, A., Babaei Kafaki, S. & Kiadaliri, H. Spatiotemporal dynamics of trees distribution patterns following disturbance caused by decline in the oak forests of Lorestan province. For. Res. Dev. https://doi.org/10.30466/jfrd.2023.54622.1663 (2023).

Shiravand, H., Khaledi, S. & Behzadi, S. Evaluation and prediction of decline of oak forests in middle Zagros (Lorestan section) with a climate change approach. Iran. J. For. Range Prot. Res. 17 , 64–81. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijfrpr.2019.119992 (2019).

Ghobari, H. et al. Investigation of presence, distribution and flight period of oak leaf roller moth, Tortrix viridana (Lep.: Tortricidae) using pheromone traps in Kurdistan province. J. Entomol. Soc. Iran 27 , 47–59 (2007).

Yangui, I. et al. Occurrence of Biscogniauxia mediterranea in cork oak stands in Tunisia. Phytoparasitica 49 , 131–141 (2021).

Raimondo, M. L., Lops, F. & Carlucci, A. Charcoal canker of pear, plum, and quince trees caused by Biscogniauxia rosacearum sp. nov. in Southern Italy. Plant Dis. 100 , 1813–1822. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1037-RE (2016).

Wilson, D. Endophyte: The evolution of a term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos 73 , 274–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545919 (1995).

Biocca, M. & Motta, E. Aspects of latency of Hypoxylon mediterraneum in declining Turkey oaks ( Quercus cerris ). Petria 5 , 171–176 (1995).

Brasier, C. Phytophthora cinnamomi and oak decline in southern Europe. Environmental constraints including climate change. Ann. For. Sci. 53 , 347–358 (1996).

Rodríguez-Molina, M. et al. Seasonal and spatial mortality patterns of holm oak seedlings in a reforested soil infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi . For. Pathol. 35 , 411–422 (2005).

Homet, P. et al. Exploring interactive effects of climate change and exotic pathogens on Quercus suber performance: Damage caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi varies across contrasting scenarios of soil moisture. Agric. For. Meteorol. 276–277 , 107605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.06.004 (2019).

Khodakarami, Y., Pourhashemi, M., Khanhasani, M., Safari, H. & Pourreza, M. Effect of thinning on growth of Brant’s oak ( Quercus brantii Lindl.) sprout-clumps in Kermanshah. Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 24 , 42–32 (2016).

Ahmadi, S., Zahedi Amiri, G. & Marvie Mohadjer, M. R. Mapping Brant’s oak ( Quercus brantii Lindl.) mortality using geostatistical methods in Dasht-e Barm, Fars province. Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 24 , 450–439 (2016).

Ghanbary, E., Tabari Kouchaksaraei, M., Mirabolfathy, M., Modarres Sanavi, S. A. M. & Rahaie, M. Growth and physiological responses of Quercus brantii seedlings inoculated with Biscogniauxia mediterranea and Obolarina persica under drought stress. For. Pathol. 47 , e12353. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12353 (2017).

Ghobad-Nejhad, M. Inonotus krawtzewii causes noteworthy damage to oak stands in Zagros, western Asia, with a key to morphologically similar species worldwide. Nordic J. Bot. 34 , 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01122 (2016).

Hosseini, A. Infestation of forest trees to the borer beetle and its relation to habitat conditions in the Persian oak ( Quercus brantii ) in Ilam Province. For. Range Prot. Res. 9 , 53–66 (2011).

Sargazi, A. & Hasanvand, M. The study of comparative advantage of nomad’s livestock using policy analysis matrix (Case study of city of Khorram Abad, Lorestan province). Int. J. Agric. 3 , 737 (2013).

Iran, S. C. O. The National Census of Agriculture (1971) (in Persian) .

Iran, S. C. O. The National Census of Agriculture (2017) (in Persian) .

Talebi, K. S., Sajedi, T. & Pourhashemi, M. Forests of Iran. In A Treasure from the Past, A Hope for the Future (Springer, 2014).

Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4. Available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database ( http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org ) 15 , 5 (2008).

(ed NASA/CGIAR) (2000).

Esri. Clip a grid to a specific polygon shape . https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/how-to-clip-a-grid-to-a-specific-polygon-shape-000018272 (2022).

Esri. Slope function . https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/manage-data/raster-and-images/slope-function.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_4246944619A4469FA79DFCCB368F5CDE (2023).

Diversity, G. S. T. Conservation Science Partners (2011).

Theobald, D. M., Harrison-Atlas, D., Monahan, W. B. & Albano, C. M. Ecologically-relevant maps of landforms and physiographic diversity for climate adaptation planning. PLoS One 10 , e0143619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143619 (2015).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5 , 170191. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191 (2018).

(ed University of California Merced) (2022).

Alley, W. M. The palmer drought severity index: Limitations and assumptions. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 23 , 1100–1109. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023%3c1100:TPDSIL%3e2.0.CO;2 (1984).

Sharnegar (2022).

Poggio, L. et al. SoilGrids 2.0: Producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. Soil 7 , 217–240. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021 (2021).

Article   ADS   CAS   Google Scholar  

Turek, M. E. et al. Global mapping of volumetric water retention at 100, 330 and 15 000 cm suction using the WoSIS database. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 11 , 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.08.001 (2023).

Zhao, K. et al. Detecting change-point, trend, and seasonality in satellite time series data to track abrupt changes and nonlinear dynamics: A Bayesian ensemble algorithm. Remote Sens. Environ. 232 , 111181 (2019).

Tallarida, R. J. & Murray, R. B. In Manual of Pharmacologic Calculations: With Computer Programs (eds Tallarida, R. J. & Murray, R. B.) 77–81 (Springer, 1987).

Laux, P. Linear regression analysis for detecting trends in climatological time series (2008).

Pearson, K. X. Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution—II. Skew variation in homogeneous material. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 186 , 343–414 (1895).

Zhao, K. Rbeast: A Python package for Bayesian changepoint detection and time series decomposition . https://github.com/zhaokg/Rbeast/tree/master/Python (2022).

VanderPlas, J. et al. Altair: Interactive statistical visualizations for Python. J. Open Source Softw. 3 , 1057 (2018).

Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 , 90–95 (2007).

Neina, D. The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2019 , 5794869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869 (2019).

South, D. B. Is the recommended pH for growing hardwood seedlings wrong?. REFORESTA https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.7.07.69 (2019).

Capretti, P. & Battisti, A. Water stress and insect defoliation promote the colonization of Quercus cerris by the fungus Biscogniauxia mediterranea . For. Pathol. 37 , 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00489.x (2007).

Mahdavi, A., Mirzaei, J. & Karami, O. The status of dead standing trees in Zagros forest (Case study: Bioreh Forests in Ilam Province). For. Sustain. Dev. 1 , 329–340 (2015).

Zolfaghari, R., Dalvand, F., Fayyaz, P. & Solla, A. Maternal drought stress on Persian oak ( Quercus brantii Lindl.) affects susceptibility to single and combined drought and biotic stress in offspring. Environ. Exp. Bot. 194 , 104716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104716 (2022).

Jafarnia, S., Akbarinia, M., Hosseinpour, B., Modarres Sanavi, S. & Salami, S. Effect of drought stress on some growth, morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of two different populations of Quercus brantii . iForest Biogeosci. For. 11 , 212–220. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2496-010 (2018).

Nazaripour, H., Hamidianpour, M., Khosravi, M. & Vazirimehr, M. Variability of drought frequency and intensity in Iran using SPEI. JSTNAR 26 , 233–247. https://doi.org/10.47176/jwss.26.4.45861 (2023).

Safari, E. et al. Regional drought conditions control Quercus brantii Lindl. growth within contrasting forest stands in the central Zagros mountains Iran. Forests 13 , 495 (2022).

Attarod, P., Beiranvand, S., Asgari, M., Fanaei, N. & Hashemzadeh, M. The effects of rainfall fluctuations on declining Zagros Forests in Ilam and Lorestan provinces. Iran. J. For. 13 , 141–154. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijf.2021.136938 (2021).

Barani, N. & Karami, A. Annual trend analysis of climate parameters of temperature and precipitation in decuple agroecology regions of Iran. Environ. Sci. 17 , 75–90. https://doi.org/10.29252/envs.17.4.75 (2019).

Rostamian, M., Kavosi, M. R., Bazgir, E. & Babanezhad, M. Investigation of physiological changes in the affected Quercus brantii stand by oak charcoal disease. J. For. Sci. 65 , 106–112 (2019).

Poursartip, L., Naseri Karimvand, S., Moradi, M. & Susani, J. Comparing the impact of climate variables on healthy and declined masses of oak ( Quercus brantti Lindl.) in the “Khorram Abad” city, Iran. J. Wood Paper Ind. 7 , 591–600 (2017).

Henriques, J. et al. Factors affecting the dispersion of Biscogniauxia mediterranea in Portuguese cork oak stands. Silva Lusitana 22 , 83–97 (2014).

Dezfoli, H., Badehian, Z., Naghavi, H. & Karami, S. The relationship of some tree characteristics, forest stands and physiographic factors with the rate of dieback. J. Wood For. Sci. Technol. 26 , 69–82. https://doi.org/10.22069/jwfst.2019.15319.1760 (2019).

Pourhashemi, M. Study of Natural Regeneration of Oak Species in Marivan Forests (Case study: Doveyse Forest), PhD Thesis (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources University, 2003).

Pourhashemi, M., Marvi, M. M., Zobeyri, M., Zahedi, A. G. & Panahi, P. A study of the factors effective on sprouting of oak species in Marivan forests (Case study: Doveyse forest) (2007).

Ghanbari Motlagh, M., Amraei, B. & Halimi, M. Evaluating the hazardous potential of the dieback of the Zagros Oak forests using the multi-criteria decision-making methods. Arab. J. Geosci. 13 , 995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05992-6 (2020).

Karami, J., Kavosi, M. & Babanezhad, M. Assessing the relationship between some environmental variables and spread of charcoal disease on chestnut-leaved oak ( Quercus castaneifolia CA Mey). Iran. J. For. Range Prot. Res. 13 , 34–45 (2015).

Mausolf, K. et al. Legacy effects of land-use modulate tree growth responses to climate extremes. Oecologia 187 , 825–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4156-9 (2018).

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Soleymani, N., Dargahi, D., Pourhashemi, M. & Amiri, M. Effects of physiographical factors on oak sprout-clumps structure in Baba-Kooseh forest; Kermanshah province. Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 16 , 467–477 (2008).

Kormanek, M., Głąb, T., Banach, J. & Szewczyk, G. Effects of soil bulk density on sessile oak Quercus petraea Liebl. seedlings. Eur. J. For. Res. 134 , 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0902-2 (2015).

Panagos, P. et al. Soil bulk density assessment in Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 364 , 108907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.108907 (2024).

Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S. & López-Moreno, J. I. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Clim. 23 , 1696–1718 (2010).

Dastmalchi, M., Gheisy, S. & Sagheb-Talebi, K. Results of elimination and pioneer trials with tree species in West Azerbayjan province. Iran. J. For. Poplar Res. 1 , 1–68. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijfpr.1998.109767 (1998).

MortazaviJahromi, S. Results of Eucalyptus Species Elimination Trials in Fars Province (Southern Iran) (Research Institute of Forests and Rengelands, 1994).

Sarab, S. A., Rashki, A., Moayeri, M. H. & Jouibari, S. S. Investigating the impact of drought and dust on oak trees decline in the West of Iran. Arab. J. Geosci. 15 , 1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10759-2 (2022).

Farmer, A. M. The effects of dust on vegetation—A review. Environ. Pollut. 79 , 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(93)90179-R (1993).

Schmitz, O. J. et al. Conserving biodiversity: Practical guidance about climate change adaptation approaches in support of land-use planning. Nat. Areas J. 35 , 190–203 (2015).

Stein, B. A., Glick, P., Edelson, N. & Staudt, A. Climate-smart Conservation: Putting Adaption Principles into Practice. Report No. 0615997317 (National Wildlife Federation, 2014).

Amatulli, G. et al. A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Sci. Data 5 , 180040. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.40 (2018).

Jiang, B., Liang, S., Wang, J. & Xiao, Z. Modeling MODIS LAI time series using three statistical methods. Remote Sens. Environ. 114 , 1432–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.026 (2010).

Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F. & Dahe, Q. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2012).

Zargar, A., Sadiq, R., Naser, B. & Khan, F. I. A review of drought indices. Environ. Rev. 19 , 333–349 (2011).

Mishra, A. K. & Singh, V. P. A review of drought concepts. J. Hydrol. 391 , 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012 (2010).

Webster, K. E., Kratz, T. K., Bowser, C. J., Magnuson, J. J. & Rose, W. J. The influence of landscape position on lake chemical responses to drought in northern Wisconsin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41 , 977–984 (1996).

Riebsame, W. E. Drought and Natural Resources Management in the United States: Impacts and Implications of the 1987–89 Drought (Routledge, 2019).

Palmer, W. C. Meteorological Drought Vol. 30 (US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, 1965).

Wei, J. & Ma, Z. Comparison of Palmer drought severity index, percentage of precipitation anomaly and surface humid index. Acta Geogr. Sin. 58 , 117–124 (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their excellent suggestions to improve the original draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Geospatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Saeed Mehri & Ali Asghar Alesheikh

Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, USA

Aynaz Lotfata

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: S.M., A.A.A., Data Curation: S.M., Formal Analysis: S.M., Investigation: A.A.A., A.L., Methodology: S.M., A.A.A., Project administration: S.M., A.A.A., A.L., Resources: S.M., Software: S.M., Supervision: A.A.A., A.L.,Visualization: S.M., Writing—original draft: S.M., Writing—review and editing: A.A.A., A.L. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Asghar Alesheikh .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Mehri, S., Alesheikh, A.A. & Lotfata, A. Abiotic factors impact on oak forest decline in Lorestan Province, Western Iran. Sci Rep 14 , 3973 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54551-6

Download citation

Received : 15 August 2023

Accepted : 14 February 2024

Published : 17 February 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54551-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Abiotic stressors
  • Meteorological factors
  • Ecosystem sustainability
  • Time series

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

impact factor scientific reports nature research

IMAGES

  1. (New) Scientific Reports Impact Factor: Understanding the Metrics of

    impact factor scientific reports nature research

  2. Available Online Open Source

    impact factor scientific reports nature research

  3. Nature Impact Factor: scientometric analysis

    impact factor scientific reports nature research

  4. What‘s a Good Impact Factor & Why It Matters. An 4-Step Journey

    impact factor scientific reports nature research

  5. Nature impact factor and citations: scientometric analysis

    impact factor scientific reports nature research

  6. Nature Impact Factor 2022

    impact factor scientific reports nature research

VIDEO

  1. Scientific Research Aid

  2. 'Facts' are somewhat at odds with science being a process. #science #researcher #facts #shorts

  3. Why Ideally It's Always a Right Angle Science Experiment Education Physics Experiment

  4. ¿Alergias, lagunas mentales? elimina el hongo cándida

  5. Research as Scientific

  6. Research Journal Impact Factor Calculation

COMMENTS

  1. Scientific Reports

    Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor of 4.6 (2022), and is the 5th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 738,000 citations in 2022*. *2023 Journal Citation Reports®...

  2. Journal Metrics

    Definitions 2-year Impact Factor: The Journal Impact Factor is defined as all citations to the journal in the current JCR year to items published in the previous two years, divided by the...

  3. Scientific Reports

    According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2022 impact factor 4.6. [8] Reviewing policy

  4. Aims & scope

    Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.996 (2021), and is the 5th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 696,000 citations in 2021*. *2021 Journal Citation Reports®...

  5. Scientific Reports Latest Journal's Impact IF 2023-2024

    4.997 14.1% Journal's Impact IF Trend Journal's Impact Ranking Scientific Reports Journal's Impact Ranking Key Factor Analysis Top IF Gainers Explore More Top IF Losers Explore More Share Your Journal's Impact IF Information with Community Do you know the Latest Journal's Impact IF of Scientific Reports? Share with the community!

  6. Journal Metrics

    The Journal Impact Factor is defined as all citations to the journal in the current JCR year to items published in the previous two years, divided by the total number of scholarly items (these...

  7. Scientific Reports

    Scientific Reports is an open access journal publishing original research from across all areas of the natural sciences, medicine and engineering. Global influence We offer our authors a highly respected home for their research.

  8. Impact factors for journals : Nature Support

    Springer A number of Springer journals have impact factors and some journals are being tracked by Clarivate Analytics and will receive their impact factor in due course. For any journal to...

  9. Scientific Reports

    Aims and scope. Scientific Reports is an open access, multidisciplinary journal from the Nature Portfolio publishing original research from across all areas of the natural sciences, medicine and ...

  10. (New) Scientific Reports Impact Factor: Understanding the Metrics of

    Scientific Reports Impact Factor - Scientific Reports is an open-access journal published by the Nature Research group that covers a broad range of scientific disciplines. It has gained popularity among researchers due to its fast publication times and wide readership. One of the metrics used to measure the impact of a journal is its impact factor.

  11. Research articles

    Joshua P. Newell Article Open Access 08 Mar 2024 Influence of teach-back strategy on hemodialysis related knowledge level, self-efficacy and self-management in patients receiving maintenance...

  12. Scientific Reports

    Information Homepage How to publish in this journal [email protected] Scope We publish original research from all areas of the natural and clinical sciences. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below, or exploring Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.

  13. Nature, Science, and PNAS: disciplinary profiles and impact

    Nature, Science, and PNAS are the three most prestigious general-science journals, and Nature and Science are among the most influential journals overall, based on the journal Impact Factor (IF). In this paper we perform automatic classification of ~ 50,000 articles in these journals (published in the period 2005-2015) into 14 broad areas, to explore disciplinary profiles of these journals ...

  14. publications

    The Journal "Scientific Reports", published by the Nature publishing group, is gaining popularity with time (impact factor now around 5.2). It highlights its editorial policy as one that is focused on scientific rigour and validity, rather than perceived impact.

  15. Nature Scientific Reports

    Scientific Reports is an online, open access journal from the publishers of Nature. It publishes scientifically valid primary research from all areas of the natural and clinical sciences. The 2016 journal metrics for Scientific Reports are as follows: 2-year impact factor: 4.259; 5-year impact factor: 4.847; Immediacy index: 0.647

  16. Browse Articles

    Abiotic factors impact on oak forest decline in Lorestan Province, Western Iran. Saeed Mehri; ... Scientific Reports (Sci Rep) ISSN 2045-2322 (online) nature.com sitemap. About Nature Portfolio ... Scientific editing; Nature Masterclasses; Research Solutions; Libraries & institutions.

  17. Analysis of related factors for RA flares after SARS-CoV-2 ...

    RA patients have immune dysfunction, long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs, and low SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rate, which make them a vulnerable group during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  18. Journal Metrics

    The Journal Impact Factor is defined as all citations to the journal in the current JCR year to items published in the previous two years, divided by the total number of scholarly items (these...

  19. Is Nature Scientific Reports a good/reputable journal?

    Started 18th Apr, 2022 Chan Kin Onn University of Kansas Is Nature Scientific Reports a good/reputable journal? While Nature Scientific Reports (NSR) is obviously not as rigorous as...

  20. Nature Latest Journal's Impact IF 2023-2024

    Nature was one of the world's most cited scientific journals by the Science Edition of the 2019 Journal Citation Reports (with an ascribed impact factor of 42.778), making it one of the world's most-read and most prestigious academic journals.

  21. Scientific Reports Impact factor: "riding high"

    A report by Clarivate Analytics, Web of Science Journal Citation Reports (WoS JCR), includes Journal Impact Factors each year. Recently, it has been found that Scientific Reports, a journal of Nature Publishing Group with an option of open-access, is gaining popularity and importance among researchers for its wide coverage of all research areas ...

  22. Exploring stress response's role in executive function ...

    However, research on their impact on inhibitory control and working memory, particularly among healthy young adults, remains limited. The role played by the stress response as a moderator in these ...

  23. Nature Scientific Reports

    Scientific Reports is an online, open access journal from the publishers of Nature. It publishes scientifically valid primary research from all areas of the natural and clinical sciences. The 2016 journal metrics for Scientific Reports are as follows: 2-year impact factor: 4.259. 5-year impact factor: 4.847. Immediacy index: 0.647.

  24. Prediction of steel plate-based damper for improving the ...

    Steel damper slenderness factor (λ) The maximum model order was set to quadratic for process factors, the properties of which are shown in Tables 12, 13 and 14.The selected model on the Model tab ...

  25. Source identification and potential health risks from elevated ...

    In recent years groundwater contamination through nitrate contamination has increased rapidly in the managementof water research. In our study, fourteen nitrate conditioning factors were used, and ...

  26. The metrics of reading speed: understanding developmental ...

    The reading times in Fig. 1A (next called "single") represent the basis for developing predictions for reading stimuli presented in multiple displays. In doing so, we only loosely refer to the ...

  27. Exploring the spatiotemporal relationship between influenza ...

    This research was financially supported by Fuzhou Science and Technology Major Project (2019-SZ-63, 2020-Z-5 and 2022-S-032), and Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission, China ...

  28. Abiotic factors impact on oak forest decline in Lorestan ...

    Scientific Reports - Abiotic factors impact on oak forest decline in Lorestan Province, Western Iran ... Nature Masterclasses; Research Solutions; Libraries & institutions. Librarian service & tools;