Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Review Article
  • Published: 02 March 2021

Building the Himalaya from tectonic to earthquake scales

  • Luca Dal Zilio   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-0894 1 ,
  • György Hetényi   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-4761 2 ,
  • Judith Hubbard 3 &
  • Laurent Bollinger 4  

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment volume  2 ,  pages 251–268 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

15k Accesses

48 Citations

89 Altmetric

Metrics details

  • Natural hazards

Convergence of the Indian Plate towards Eurasia has led to the building of the Himalaya, the highest mountain range on Earth. Active mountain building involves a complex interplay between permanent tectonic processes and transient seismic events, which remain poorly understood. In this Review, we examine the feedbacks between long-term tectonic deformation (over millions of years) and the seismic cycle (years to centuries) in the Himalaya. We discuss how surface morphology of the Himalaya indicates that the convergence is largely accommodated by slip on the Main Himalayan Thrust plate boundary fault, which developed in the roots of the mountain range over millions of years. At shorter (decadal) timescales, tectonic geodesy reveals that elastic strain is periodically released via earthquakes. We use examples from earthquake cycle models to suggest that partial ruptures could primarily occur in the downdip region of the Main Himalayan Thrust. Great (Mw 8+) Himalayan earthquakes are more commonly associated with complete megathrust ruptures, which release accumulated residual strain. By synthesizing numerous observations that co-vary along strike, we highlight that tectonic structures that developed over millions of years can influence stress accumulation, structural segmentation, earthquake rupture extent and location, and, consequently, the growth of the mountain range.

The Himalayan mountain belt is a unique subaerial orogenic wedge characterized by tectonically rapid, ongoing crustal shortening and thickening, intense surface denudation and recurrent great (Mw 8+) earthquakes.

The history of the orogen has been investigated from long (million-year) to short (seconds to days) timescales using a variety of geological and geophysical techniques.

The magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake and aftershocks were monitored by extensive local geophysical networks, providing a unique set of observations of a major Himalayan earthquake and the Himalayan seismic cycle.

Observations across the Himalaya reveal along-strike segmentation patterns at various temporal scales, controlled by inherited tectonic complexities developed over millions of years.

Developing a complete understanding of deformation across timescales from seconds to millions of years requires an integrated, interdisciplinary effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

92,52 € per year

only 7,71 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

himalayan geology research paper

Bilham, R. Himalayan earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 483 , 423–482 (2019).

Google Scholar  

Wesnousky, S. G. Great pending Himalaya earthquakes. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91 , 3334–3342 (2020).

Turcotte, D. & Schubert, G. Geodynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

Scholz, C. H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

Dal Zilio, L., van Dinther, Y., Gerya, T. V. & Pranger, C. C. Seismic behaviour of mountain belts controlled by plate convergence rate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 482 , 81–92 (2018).

Molnar, P. & England, P. Late Cenozoic uplift of mountain ranges and global climate change: chicken or egg? Nature 346 , 29–34 (1990).

Willett, S. D. Orogeny and orography: the effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 104 , 28957–28981 (1999).

Burbank, D. et al. Decoupling of erosion and precipitation in the Himalayas. Nature 426 , 652–655 (2003).

Whipple, K. X. The influence of climate on the tectonic evolution of mountain belts. Nat. Geosci. 2 , 97–104 (2009).

Whittaker, A. C. How do landscapes record tectonics and climate? Lithosphere 4 , 160–164 (2012).

Molnar, P., England, P. & Martinod, J. Mantle dynamics, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian Monsoon. Rev. Geophys. 31 , 357–396 (1993).

Zhisheng, A., Kutzbach, J. E., Prell, W. L. & Porter, S. C. Evolution of Asian monsoons and phased uplift of the Himalaya–Tibetan plateau since Late Miocene times. Nature 411 , 62–66 (2001).

Powell, C. M. A. & Conaghan, P. Plate tectonics and the Himalayas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 20 , 1–12 (1973).

Molnar, P. & Tapponnier, P. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of a continental collision. Science 189 , 419–426 (1975).

Tapponnier, P., Peltzer, G., Le Dain, A., Armijo, R. & Cobbold, P. Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: New insights from simple experiments with plasticine. Geology 10 , 611–616 (1982).

Yin, A. & Harrison, T. M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 28 , 211–280 (2000).

Avouac, J.-P. Mountain building: from earthquakes to geologic deformation. Treatise Geophys. 6 , 381–432 (2015).

Avouac, J.-P. & Tapponnier, P. Kinematic model of active deformation in central Asia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20 , 895–898 (1993).

Copley, A., Avouac, J.-P. & Royer, J.-Y. India-Asia collision and the Cenozoic slowdown of the Indian plate: Implications for the forces driving plate motions. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 115 , B03410 (2010).

Cande, S. C. & Stegman, D. R. Indian and African plate motions driven by the push force of the Réunion plume head. Nature 475 , 47–52 (2011).

de Sigoyer, J. et al. Dating the Indian continental subduction and collisional thickening in the northwest Himalaya: Multichronology of the Tso Morari eclogites. Geology 28 , 487–490 (2000).

Ding, L., Kapp, P. & Wan, X. Paleocene–Eocene record of ophiolite obduction and initial India-Asia collision, south central Tibet. Tectonics 24 , TC3001 (2005).

Patriat, P. & Achache, J. India–Eurasia collision chronology has implications for crustal shortening and driving mechanism of plates. Nature 311 , 615–621 (1984).

Pusok, A. E. & Stegman, D. R. The convergence history of India-Eurasia records multiple subduction dynamics processes. Sci. Adv. 6 , eaaz8681 (2020).

DeMets, C., Merkouriev, S. & Jade, S. High-resolution reconstructions and GPS estimates of India–Eurasia and India–Somalia plate motions: 20 Ma to the present. Geophys. J. Int. 220 , 1149–1171 (2020).

Molnar, P. & Stock, J. M. Slowing of India’s convergence with Eurasia since 20 Ma and its implications for Tibetan mantle dynamics. Tectonics 28 , TC3001 (2009).

Capitanio, F., Morra, G., Goes, S., Weinberg, R. & Moresi, L. India–Asia convergence driven by the subduction of the Greater Indian continent. Nat. Geosci. 3 , 136–139 (2010).

Burg, J. & Chen, G. Tectonics and structural zonation of southern Tibet, China. Nature 311 , 219–223 (1984).

Burchfiel, B. C. et al. The South Tibetan Detachment System, Himalayan Orogen: Extension Contemporaneous With and Parallel to Shortening in a Collisional Mountain Belt Vol. 269 (Geological Society of America, 1992).

Jixiang, Y., Juntao, X., Chengjie, L. & Huan, L. The Tibetan plateau: regional stratigraphic context and previous work. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 327 , 5–52 (1988).

Brookfield, M. The Himalayan passive margin from Precambrian to Cretaceous times. Sediment. Geol. 84 , 1–35 (1993).

Gansser, A. Geology of the Himalayas (Interscience, 1964).

Schelling, D. & Arita, K. Thrust tectonics, crustal shortening, and the structure of the far-eastern Nepal Himalaya. Tectonics 10 , 851–862 (1991).

Mugnier, J. L. et al. The Siwaliks of western Nepal: I. Geometry and kinematics. J. Asian Earth Sci. 17 , 629–642 (1999).

DeCelles, P. G. et al. Stratigraphy, structure, and tectonic evolution of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt in western Nepal. Tectonics 20 , 487–509 (2001).

Meigs, A. J., Burbank, D. W. & Beck, R. A. Middle-late Miocene (>10 Ma) formation of the Main Boundary thrust in the western Himalaya. Geology 23 , 423–426 (1995).

Ghoshal, S. et al. Constraining central Himalayan (Nepal) fault geometry through integrated thermochronology and thermokinematic modeling. Tectonics 39 , e2020TC006399 (2020).

Gansser, A. The geodynamic history of the Himalaya. Zagros Hindu Kush Himalaya Geodyn. Evol. 3 , 111–121 (1981).

Catlos, E. J. et al. Geochronologic and thermobarometric constraints on the evolution of the Main Central Thrust, central Nepal Himalaya. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 106 , 16177–16204 (2001).

Robinson, D. et al. Kinematic model for the Main Central thrust in Nepal. Geology 31 , 359–362 (2003).

Davies, G. F. & Brune, J. N. Regional and global fault slip rates from seismicity. Nat. Phys. Sci. 229 , 101–107 (1971).

Audet, P., Bostock, M. G., Christensen, N. I. & Peacock, S. M. Seismic evidence for overpressured subducted oceanic crust and megathrust fault sealing. Nature 457 , 76–78 (2009).

Bollinger, L. et al. Thermal structure and exhumation history of the Lesser Himalaya in central Nepal. Tectonics 23 , TC5015 (2004).

Robinson, D. M., DeCelles, P. G., Patchett, P. J. & Garzione, C. N. The kinematic evolution of the Nepalese Himalaya interpreted from Nd isotopes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 192 , 507–521 (2001).

Brown, L. et al. Bright spots, structure, and magmatism in southern Tibet from INDEPTH seismic reflection profiling. Science 274 , 1688–1690 (1996).

Hauck, M., Nelson, K., Brown, L., Zhao, W. & Ross, A. Crustal structure of the Himalayan orogen at ~90° east longitude from Project INDEPTH deep reflection profiles. Tectonics 17 , 481–500 (1998).

Boullier, A.-M., France-Lanord, C., Dubessy, J., Adamy, J. & Champenois, M. Linked fluid and tectonic evolution in the High Himalaya mountains (Nepal). Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 107 , 358–372 (1991).

Lemonnier, C. et al. Electrical structure of the Himalaya of central Nepal: High conductivity around the mid-crustal ramp along the MHT. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 , 3261–3264 (1999).

Hetényi, G. Evolution of deformation of the Himalayan prism: From imaging to modelling . PhD thesis, École Normale Supérieure–Université Paris-Sud XI (2007).

Nábeˇlek, J. et al. Underplating in the Himalaya-Tibet collision zone revealed by the Hi-CLIMB experiment. Science 325 , 1371–1374 (2009).

Acton, C., Priestley, K., Mitra, S. & Gaur, V. Crustal structure of the Darjeeling—Sikkim Himalaya and southern Tibet. Geophys. J. Int. 184 , 829–852 (2011).

Subedi, S. et al. Imaging the Moho and the Main Himalayan Thrust in Western Nepal with receiver functions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45 , 13–222 (2018).

Singer, J., Kissling, E., Diehl, T. & Hetényi, G. The underthrusting Indian crust and its role in collision dynamics of the Eastern Himalaya in Bhutan: Insights from receiver function imaging. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122 , 1152–1178 (2017).

Duputel, Z. et al. The 2015 Gorkha earthquake: a large event illuminating the Main Himalayan Thrust fault. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 , 2517–2525 (2016).

Caldwell, W. B. et al. Characterizing the Main Himalayan Thrust in the Garhwal Himalaya, India with receiver function CCP stacking. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 367 , 15–27 (2013).

Schulte-Pelkum, V. et al. Imaging the Indian subcontinent beneath the Himalaya. Nature 435 , 1222–1225 (2005).

Cattin, R. & Avouac, J. Modeling mountain building and the seismic cycle in the Himalaya of Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 105 , 13389–13407 (2000).

Vergne, J., Cattin, R. & Avouac, J. On the use of dislocations to model interseismic strain and stress build-up at intracontinental thrust faults. Geophys. J. Int. 147 , 155–162 (2001).

Hoste-Colomer, R., Bollinger, L., Lyon-Caen, H., Burtin, A. & Adhikari, L. Lateral structure variations and transient swarm revealed by seismicity along the Main Himalayan Thrust north of Kathmandu. Tectonophysics 714 , 107–116 (2017).

Hoste-Colomer, R. et al. Lateral variations of the midcrustal seismicity in western Nepal: Seismotectonic implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 504 , 115–125 (2018).

Baillard, C. et al. Automatic analysis of the Gorkha earthquake aftershock sequence: evidences of structurally segmented seismicity. Geophys. J. Int. 209 , 1111–1125 (2017).

Yamada, M., Kandel, T., Tamaribuchi, K. & Ghosh, A. 3D fault structure inferred from a refined aftershock catalog for the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 110 , 26–37 (2020).

Mendoza, M. et al. Duplex in the Main Himalayan Thrust illuminated by aftershocks of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 12 , 1018–1022 (2019).

Lavé, J. & Avouac, J.-P. Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of central Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 105 , 5735–5770 (2000).

Lavé, J. & Avouac, J. Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 106 , 26561–26591 (2001).

Seeber, L. & Gornitz, V. River profiles along the Himalayan arc as indicators of active tectonics. Tectonophysics 92 , 335–367 (1983).

Malik, J. N. et al. Active fault, fault growth and segment linkage along the Janauri anticline (frontal foreland fold), NW Himalaya, India. Tectonophysics 483 , 327–343 (2010).

Wesnousky, S. G., Kumar, S., Mohindra, R. & Thakur, V. Uplift and convergence along the Himalayan Frontal Thrust of India. Tectonics 18 , 967–976 (1999).

Almeida, R. V., Hubbard, J., Liberty, L., Foster, A. & Sapkota, S. N. Seismic imaging of the Main Frontal Thrust in Nepal reveals a shallow décollement and blind thrusting. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 494 , 216–225 (2018).

Bollinger, L. et al. Estimating the return times of great Himalayan earthquakes in eastern Nepal: Evidence from the Patu and Bardibas strands of the Main Frontal Thrust. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119 , 7123–7163 (2014).

Ader, T. et al. Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: Implications for seismic hazard. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117 , B04403 (2012).

Bettinelli, P. et al. Plate motion of India and interseismic strain in the Nepal Himalaya from GPS and DORIS measurements. J. Geodesy 80 , 567–589 (2006).

Bilham, R., Larson, K. & Freymueller, J. GPS measurements of present-day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya. Nature 386 , 61–64 (1997).

Chen, Q. et al. A deforming block model for the present-day tectonics of Tibet. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 109 , B01403 (2004).

Jouanne, F. et al. Oblique convergence in the Himalayas of western Nepal deduced from preliminary results of GPS measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 , 1933–1936 (1999).

Wang, Q. et al. Present-day crustal deformation in China constrained by global positioning system measurements. Science 294 , 574–577 (2001).

Wang, M. & Shen, Z.-K. Present-day crustal deformation of continental China derived from GPS and its tectonic implications. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125 , e2019JB018774 (2020).

Stevens, V. & Avouac, J. Interseismic coupling on the main Himalayan thrust. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 , 5828–5837 (2015).

Li, S. et al. Geodetic imaging mega-thrust coupling beneath the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 747 , 225–238 (2018).

Wang, K., Hu, Y. & He, J. Deformation cycles of subduction earthquakes in a viscoelastic Earth. Nature 484 , 327–332 (2012).

Avouac, J.-P. From geodetic imaging of seismic and aseismic fault slip to dynamic modeling of the seismic cycle. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 43 , 233–271 (2015).

Stevens, V. & Avouac, J.-P. Millenary M w > 9.0 earthquakes required by geodetic strain in the Himalaya. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 , 1118–1123 (2016).

Almeida, R. et al. Can the updip limit of frictional locking on megathrusts be detected geodetically? Quantifying the effect of stress shadows on near-trench coupling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45 , 4754–4763 (2018).

Dal Zilio, L., Jolivet, R. & van Dinther, Y. Segmentation of the Main Himalayan Thrust illuminated by Bayesian inference of interseismic coupling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47 , e2019GL086424 (2020).

Yadav, R. K. et al. Strong seismic coupling underneath Garhwal–Kumaun region, NW Himalaya, India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 506 , 8–14 (2019).

Sreejith, K. et al. Audit of stored strain energy and extent of future earthquake rupture in central Himalaya. Sci. Rep. 8 , 16697 (2018).

Ponraj, M. et al. Estimation of strain distribution using GPS measurements in the Kumaun region of Lesser Himalaya. J. Asian Earth Sci. 39 , 658–667 (2010).

Marechal, A. et al. Evidence of interseismic coupling variations along the Bhutan Himalayan arc from new GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 , 12,399–12,406 (2016).

Bilham, R., Mencin, D., Bendick, R. & Bürgmann, R. Implications for elastic energy storage in the Himalaya from the Gorkha 2015 earthquake and other incomplete ruptures of the Main Himalayan Thrust. Quat. Int. 462 , 3–21 (2017).

Bollinger, L., Avouac, J., Cattin, R. & Pandey, M. Stress buildup in the Himalaya. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 109 , B11405 (2004).

Bilham, R. Slow tilt reversal of the Lesser Himalaya between 1862 and 1992 at 78°E, and bounds to the southeast rupture of the 1905 Kangra earthquake. Geophys. J. Int. 144 , 713–728 (2001).

Seeber, L. & Armbruster, J. G. Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalayan arc and long-term forecasting. Earthq. Pred. Int. Rev. 4 , 259–277 (1981).

Avouac, J.-P., Ayoub, F., Leprince, S., Konca, O. & Helmberger, D. V. The 2005, M w 7.6 Kashmir earthquake: Sub-pixel correlation of ASTER images and seismic waveforms analysis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 249 , 514–528 (2006).

Nakata, T., Kumura, K. & Rockwell, T. First successful paleoseismic trench study on active faults in the Himalaya. Eos Trans. AGU 79 , 459–486 (1998).

Arora, S. & Malik, J. N. Overestimation of the earthquake hazard along the Himalaya: constraints in bracketing of medieval earthquakes from paleoseismic studies. Geosci. Lett. 4 , 19 (2017).

Lavé, J. et al. Evidence for a great medieval earthquake (~1100 A.D.) in the central Himalayas, Nepal. Science 307 , 1302–1305 (2005).

Wesnousky, S. G. et al. Geological observations on large earthquakes along the Himalayan frontal fault near Kathmandu, Nepal. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 457 , 366–375 (2017).

Wesnousky, S. G., Kumahara, Y., Chamlagain, D. & Neupane, P. C. Large Himalayan Frontal Thrust paleoearthquake at Khayarmara in eastern Nepal. J. Asian Earth Sci. 174 , 346–351 (2019).

Pant, M. R. A step toward a historical seismicity of Nepal. Adarsa 2 , 29–60 (2002).

Sapkota, S. et al. Primary surface ruptures of the great Himalayan earthquakes in 1934 and 1255. Nat. Geosci. 6 , 71–76 (2013).

Bollinger, L., Tapponnier, P., Sapkota, S. & Klinger, Y. Slip deficit in central Nepal: Omen for a repeat of the 1344 AD earthquake? Earth Planets Space 68 , 12 (2016).

Yule, D., Dawson, S., Lave, J., Sapkota, S. & Tiwari, D. Possible evidence for surface rupture of the Main Frontal Thrust during the great 1505 Himalayan earthquake, far-western Nepal. In AGU Fall Meeting abstract S33C-05 (2006).

Bilham, R., Gaur, V. K. & Molnar, P. Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293 , 1442–1444 (2001).

Ghazoui, Z. et al. Potentially large post-1505 AD earthquakes in western Nepal revealed by a lake sediment record. Nat. Commun. 10 , 2258 (2019).

Bilham, R. & England, P. Plateau ‘pop-up’ in the great 1897 Assam earthquake. Nature 410 , 806–809 (2001).

England, P. & Bilham, R. The Shillong Plateau and the great 1897 Assam earthquake. Tectonics 34 , 1792–1812 (2015).

Coudurier-Curveur, A. et al. A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 531 , 115928 (2020).

Wallace, K., Bilham, R., Blume, F., Gaur, V. & Gahalaut, V. Surface deformation in the region of the 1905 Kangra Mw = 7.8 earthquake in the period 1846–2001. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 , L15307 (2005).

Avouac, J.-P., Meng, L., Wei, S., Wang, T. & Ampuero, J.-P. Lower edge of locked Main Himalayan Thrust unzipped by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 8 , 708–711 (2015).

Galetzka, J. et al. Slip pulse and resonance of the Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Science 349 , 1091–1095 (2015).

Adhikari, L. et al. The aftershock sequence of the 2015 April 25 Gorkha–Nepal earthquake. Geophys. Suppl. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 203 , 2119–2124 (2015).

Bai, L. et al. Lateral variation of the Main Himalayan Thrust controls the rupture length of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. Sci. Adv. 5 , eaav0723 (2019).

Lindsey, E. O. et al. Line-of-sight displacement from ALOS-2 interferometry: M w 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake and M w 7.3 aftershock. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 , 6655–6661 (2015).

Zuo, R., Qu, C., Shan, X., Zhang, G. & Song, X. Coseismic deformation fields and a fault slip model for the Mw7.8 mainshock and Mw7.3 aftershock of the Gorkha-Nepal 2015 earthquake derived from Sentinel-1A SAR interferometry. Tectonophysics 686 , 158–169 (2016).

Wang, K. & Fialko, Y. Slip model of the 2015 M w 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake from inversions of ALOS-2 and GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 , 7452–7458 (2015).

Grandin, R. et al. Rupture process of the M w = 7.9 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal): insights into Himalayan megathrust segmentation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 , 8373–8382 (2015).

Elliott, J. et al. Himalayan megathrust geometry and relation to topography revealed by the Gorkha earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 9 , 174–180 (2016).

Hubbard, J. et al. Structural segmentation controlled the 2015 M w 7.8 Gorkha earthquake rupture in Nepal. Geology 44 , 639–642 (2016).

Whipple, K. X., Shirzaei, M., Hodges, K. V. & Arrowsmith, J. R. Active shortening within the Himalayan orogenic wedge implied by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 9 , 711–716 (2016).

Karplus, M. S. et al. A rapid response network to record aftershocks of the 2015 M 7.8 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91 , 2399–2408 (2020).

Dal Zilio, L., van Dinther, Y., Gerya, T. & Avouac, J.-P. Bimodal seismicity in the Himalaya controlled by fault friction and geometry. Nat. Commun. 10 , 48 (2019).

Grandin, R. et al. Long-term growth of the Himalaya inferred from interseismic InSAR measurement. Geology 40 , 1059–1062 (2012).

Mencin, D. et al. Himalayan strain reservoir inferred from limited afterslip following the Gorkha earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 9 , 533–537 (2016).

Gualandi, A. et al. Pre- and post-seismic deformation related to the 2015, M w 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Tectonophysics 714–715 , 90–106 (2017).

Qiu, Q. et al. The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: the role of fault morphology. Geology 44 , 875–878 (2016).

Pandey, M., Tandukar, R., Avouac, J., Lave, J. & Massot, J. Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan crustal ramp (Nepal). Geophys. Res. Lett. 22 , 751–754 (1995).

Herman, F. et al. Exhumation, crustal deformation, and thermal structure of the Nepal Himalaya derived from the inversion of thermochronological and thermobarometric data and modeling of the topography. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 115 , B06407 (2010).

Dal Zilio, L., Ruh, J. & Avouac, J.-P. Structural evolution of orogenic wedges: interplay between erosion and weak décollements. Tectonics 39 , e2020TC006210 (2020).

Shen, L. et al. Tectonic underplating versus out-of-sequence thrusting beneath the Lesser Himalaya: Insights from the analogue modeling of the Nepal Himalaya fold-and-thrust belt. J. Asian Earth Sci. 198 , 104167 (2020).

Jackson, M. & Bilham, R. Constraints on Himalayan deformation inferred from vertical velocity fields in Nepal and Tibet. J. Geophys. Res. 99 , 13–897 (1994).

Alvizuri, C. & Hetényi, G. Source mechanism of a lower crust earthquake beneath the Himalayas and its possible relation to metamorphism. Tectonophysics 769 , 128153 (2019).

Schulte-Pelkum, V. et al. Mantle earthquakes in the Himalayan collision zone. Geology 47 , 815–819 (2019).

Bollinger, L. et al. Seasonal modulation of seismicity in the Himalaya of Nepal. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 , L08304 (2007).

Lindsey, E. O. et al. Structural control on downdip locking extent of the Himalayan megathrust. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123 , 5265–5278 (2018).

Blanpied, M. L., Lockner, D. A. & Byerlee, J. D. Frictional slip of granite at hydrothermal conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 100 , 13045–13064 (1995).

Marone, C. Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 26 , 643–696 (1998).

Fan, W. & Shearer, P. M. Detailed rupture imaging of the 25 April 2015 Nepal earthquake using teleseismic P waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 , 5744–5752 (2015).

Yue, H. et al. Depth varying rupture properties during the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake. Tectonophysics 714 , 44–54 (2017).

Michel, S., Avouac, J.-P., Lapusta, N. & Jiang, J. Pulse-like partial ruptures and high-frequency radiation at creeping-locked transition during megathrust earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44 , 8345–8351 (2017).

Wang, X., Wei, S. & Wu, W. Double-ramp on the Main Himalayan Thrust revealed by broadband waveform modeling of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake sequence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 473 , 83–93 (2017).

Mahadevan, L., Bendick, R. & Liang, H. Why subduction zones are curved. Tectonics 29 , TC6002 (2010).

Hetényi, G. et al. Segmentation of the Himalayas as revealed by arc-parallel gravity anomalies. Sci. Rep. 6 , 33866 (2016).

Geological Survey of India, Dasgupta, S., Narula, P., Acharyya, S. K. & Banerjee, J. Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs (Geological Survey of India, 2000).

Grujic, D. et al. Stress transfer and connectivity between the Bhutan Himalaya and the Shillong Plateau. Tectonophysics 744 , 322–332 (2018).

Duncan, C., Masek, J. & Fielding, E. How steep are the Himalaya? Characteristics and implications of along-strike topographic variations. Geology 31 , 75–78 (2003).

Armijo, R., Tapponnier, P., Mercier, J. & Han, T.-L. Quaternary extension in southern Tibet: Field observations and tectonic implications. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 91 , 13803–13872 (1986).

De, R. & Kayal, J. Seismotectonic model of the Sikkim Himalaya: constraint from microearthquake surveys. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 , 1395–1400 (2003).

Dasgupta, S., Mukhopadhyay, M. & Nandy, D. Active transverse features in the central portion of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 136 , 255–264 (1987).

Murphy, M. A. et al. Limit of strain partitioning in the Himalaya marked by large earthquakes in western Nepal. Nat. Geosci. 7 , 38–42 (2014).

Diehl, T. et al. Seismotectonics of Bhutan: Evidence for segmentation of the Eastern Himalayas and link to foreland deformation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 471 , 54–64 (2017).

Kumar, A., Mitra, S. & Suresh, G. Seismotectonics of the eastern Himalayan and Indo-Burman plate boundary systems. Tectonics 34 , 2279–2295 (2015).

Vernant, P. et al. Clockwise rotation of the Brahmaputra Valley relative to India: Tectonic convergence in the eastern Himalaya, Naga Hills, and Shillong Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119 , 6558–6571 (2014).

Barman, P., Ray, J. D., Kumar, A., Chowdhury, J. & Mahanta, K. Estimation of present-day inter-seismic deformation in Kopili fault zone of north-east India using GPS measurements. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 7 , 586–599 (2016).

Gahalaut, V. & Kundu, B. Possible influence of subducting ridges on the Himalayan arc and on the ruptures of great and major Himalayan earthquakes. Gondwana Res. 21 , 1080–1088 (2012).

Duvall, M. J., Waldron, J. W., Godin, L. & Najman, Y. Active strike-slip faults and an outer frontal thrust in the Himalayan foreland basin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 , 17615–17621 (2020).

Lyon-Caen, H. & Molnar, P. Gravity anomalies, flexure of the Indian plate, and the structure, support and evolution of the Himalaya and Ganga Basin. Tectonics 4 , 513–538 (1985).

Lyon-Caen, H. & Molnar, P. Constraints on the structure of the Himalaya from an analysis of gravity anomalies and a flexural model of the lithosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 88 , 8171–8191 (1983).

Cattin, R. et al. Gravity anomalies, crustal structure and thermo-mechanical support of the Himalaya of central Nepal. Geophys. J. Int. 147 , 381–392 (2001).

Hetényi, G., Cattin, R., Vergne, J. & Nábeˇlek, J. L. The effective elastic thickness of the India Plate from receiver function imaging, gravity anomalies and thermomechanical modelling. Geophys. J. Int. 167 , 1106–1118 (2006).

Das, D., Mehra, G., Rao, K. G. C., Roy, A. L. & Narayana, M. S. Bouguer, free-air and magnetic anomalies over north-western Himalayas. Misc. Publ. Geol. Surv. India 41 , 141–148 (1979).

Banerjee, P. Gravity measurements and terrain corrections using a digital terrain model in the NW Himalaya. Comput. Geosci. 24 , 1009–1020 (1998).

Martelet, G., Sailhac, P., Moreau, F. & Diament, M. Characterization of geological boundaries using 1-D wavelet transform on gravity data: theory and application to the Himalayas. Geophysics 66 , 1116–1129 (2001).

Tiwari, V., Rao, M. V., Mishra, D. & Singh, B. Crustal structure across Sikkim, NE Himalaya from new gravity and magnetic data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 247 , 61–69 (2006).

Berthet, T. et al. Lateral uniformity of India Plate strength over central and eastern Nepal. Geophys. J. Int. 195 , 1481–1493 (2013).

Hammer, P. et al. Flexure of the India plate underneath the Bhutan Himalaya. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40 , 4225–4230 (2013).

Hubbard, J., Shaw, J. H. & Klinger, Y. Structural setting of the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan, China, earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100 , 2713–2735 (2010).

Van Hinsbergen, D. J. et al. Restoration of Cenozoic deformation in Asia and the size of Greater India. Tectonics 30 , TC5003 (2011).

Zuza, A. V., Cheng, X. & Yin, A. Testing models of Tibetan Plateau formation with Cenozoic shortening estimates across the Qilian Shan–Nan Shan thrust belt. Geosphere 12 , 501–532 (2016).

Meng, J. et al. Reduced convergence within the Tibetan Plateau by 26 Ma? Geophys. Res. Lett. 44 , 6624–6632 (2017).

DeCelles, P. G., Robinson, D. M. & Zandt, G. Implications of shortening in the Himalayan fold-thrust belt for uplift of the Tibetan Plateau. Tectonics 21 , 12-1–12-25 (2002).

Robinson, D. M., DeCelles, P. G. & Copeland, P. Tectonic evolution of the Himalayan thrust belt in western Nepal: Implications for channel flow models. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 118 , 865–885 (2006).

McQuarrie, N. et al. Preliminary stratigraphic and structural architecture of Bhutan: implications for the along strike architecture of the Himalayan system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 272 , 105–117 (2008).

Long, S., McQuarrie, N., Tobgay, T. & Grujic, D. Geometry and crustal shortening of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt, eastern and central Bhutan. Bulletin 123 , 1427–1447 (2011).

Webb, A. A. G. Preliminary balanced palinspastic reconstruction of Cenozoic deformation across the Himachal Himalaya (northwestern India). Geosphere 9 , 572–587 (2013).

Ding, L. et al. Quantifying the rise of the Himalaya orogen and implications for the South Asian monsoon. Geology 45 , 215–218 (2017).

Xu, Q. et al. Stable isotopes reveal southward growth of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau since the Paleocene. Gondwana Res. 54 , 50–61 (2018).

Gébelin, A. et al. The miocene elevation of Mount Everest. Geology 41 , 799–802 (2013).

Clift, P. D. et al. Correlation of Himalayan exhumation rates and Asian monsoon intensity. Nat. Geosci. 1 , 875–880 (2008).

Godard, V. et al. Dominance of tectonics over climate in Himalayan denudation. Geology 42 , 243–246 (2014).

Hodges, K. V., Wobus, C., Ruhl, K., Schildgen, T. & Whipple, K. Quaternary deformation, river steepening, and heavy precipitation at the front of the Higher Himalayan ranges. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 220 , 379–389 (2004).

DeCelles, P. G. et al. Neogene foreland basin deposits, erosional unroofing, and the kinematic history of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt, western Nepal. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 110 , 2–21 (1998).

Bollinger, L., Henry, P. & Avouac, J. Mountain building in the Nepal Himalaya: thermal and kinematic model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 244 , 58–71 (2006).

Khanal, S. & Robinson, D. M. Upper crustal shortening and forward modeling of the Himalayan thrust belt along the Budhi-Gandaki River, central Nepal. Int. J. Earth Sci. 102 , 1871–1891 (2013).

Srivastava, P. & Mitra, G. Thrust geometries and deep structure of the outer and lesser Himalaya, Kumaon and Garhwal (India): Implications for evolution of the Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt. Tectonics 13 , 89–109 (1994).

Fan, S. & Murphy, M. A. Three-dimensional strain accumulation and partitioning in an arcuate orogenic wedge: an example from the Himalaya. Bulletin 133 , 3–18 (2021).

Shimizu, K., Yagi, Y., Okuwaki, R. & Fukahata, Y. Construction of fault geometry by finite-fault inversion of teleseismic data. Geophys. J. Int. 224 , 1003–1014 (2021).

Okada, Y. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 , 1018–1040 (1992).

Langer, L., Ragon, T., Sladen, A. & Tromp, J. Impact of topography on earthquake static slip estimates. Tectonophysics 791 , 228566 (2020).

Wang, K. & Fialko, Y. Observations and modeling of coseismic and postseismic deformation due to the 2015 M w 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123 , 761–779 (2018).

Ingleby, T., Wright, T., Hooper, A., Craig, T. & Elliott, J. Constraints on the geometry and frictional properties of the Main Himalayan Thrust using coseismic, postseismic, and interseismic deformation in Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125 , e2019JB019201 (2020).

Drukpa, D., Gautier, S., Cattin, R., Namgay, K. & Le Moigne, N. Impact of near-surface fault geometry on secular slip rate assessment derived from uplifted river terraces: implications for convergence accommodation across the frontal thrust in southern Central Bhutan. Geophys. J. Int. 212 , 1315–1330 (2018).

Meade, B. J. The signature of an unbalanced earthquake cycle in Himalayan topography? Geology 38 , 987–990 (2010).

Yue, L.-F., Suppe, J. & Hung, J.-H. Structural geology of a classic thrust belt earthquake: the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake Taiwan ( M w =7.6). J. Struct. Geol. 27 , 2058–2083 (2005).

Tsukahara, K. & Takada, Y. Aseismic fold growth in southwestern Taiwan detected by InSAR and GNSS. Earth Planets Space 70 , 52 (2018).

Suppe, J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding. Am. J. Sci. 283 , 684–721 (1983).

Rizza, M. et al. Post earthquake aggradation processes to hide surface ruptures in thrust systems: the M8.3, 1934, Bihar-Nepal earthquake ruptures at Charnath Khola (Eastern Nepal). J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124 , 9182–9207 (2019).

Rajendran, C., John, B., Rajendran, K. & Sanwal, J. Liquefaction record of the great 1934 earthquake predecessors from the north Bihar alluvial plains of India. J. Seismol. 20 , 733–745 (2016).

Kong, Q. et al. Machine learning in seismology: turning data into insights. Seismol. Res. Lett. 90 , 3–14 (2019).

Elliott, J. R., Walters, R. J. & Wright, T. J. The role of space-based observation in understanding and responding to active tectonics and earthquakes. Nat. Commun. 7 , 13844 (2016).

Stevens, V. L., Shrestha, S. N. & Maharjan, D. K. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Nepal. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 108 , 3488–3510 (2018).

Stevens, V. L., De Risi, R., Le Roux-Mallouf, R., Drukpa, D. & Hetényi, G. Seismic hazard and risk in Bhutan. Natural Hazards 104 , 2339–2367 (2020).

Chamoli, B. P. et al. A prototype earthquake early warning system for northern India. J. Earthq. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1625828 (2019).

Article   Google Scholar  

Mittal, H., Wu, Y.-M., Sharma, M. L., Yang, B. M. & Gupta, S. Testing the performance of earthquake early warning system in northern India. Acta Geophys. 67 , 59–75 (2019).

Kumar, A. et al. in 15th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering 231–238 (2014).

Subedi, S., Hetényi, G., Denton, P. & Sauron, A. Seismology at school in Nepal: a program for educational and citizen seismology through a low-cost seismic network. Front. Earth Sci. 8 , 73 (2020).

Subedi, S., Hetényi, G. & Shackleton, R. Impact of an educational program on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Nepal. Geosci. Commun. 3 , 279–290 (2020).

Webb, A. A. G. et al. The Himalaya in 3D: slab dynamics controlled mountain building and monsoon intensification. Lithosphere 9 , 637–651 (2017).

Kreemer, C., Blewitt, G. & Klein, E. C. A geodetic plate motion and global strain rate model. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15 , 3849–3889 (2014).

Zheng, G. et al. Crustal deformation in the India-Eurasia collision zone from 25 years of GPS measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122 , 9290–9312 (2017).

Hetényi, G. et al. Joint approach combining damage and paleoseismology observations constrains the 1714 AD Bhutan earthquake at magnitude 8±0.5. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 , 10,695–10,702 (2016).

Ekström, G., Nettles, M. & Dziewon´ski, A. The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 200–201 , 1–9 (2012).

Monsalve, G. et al. Seismicity and one-dimensional velocity structure of the Himalayan collision zone: Earthquakes in the crust and upper mantle. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 111 , B10301 (2006).

Sreejith, K. M. et al. Coseismic and early postseismic deformation due to the 25 April 2015, Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake from InSAR and GPS measurements. Geophysical Research Letters , 43 , 3160–3168 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

L.D.Z. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) (grants P2EZP2_184307 and P400P2_199295) and the Cecil and Sally Drinkward fellowship at Caltech. G.H. acknowledges the SNSF for funding the OROG3NY project (grants PP00P2_157627 and PP00P2_187199). J.H. is supported by the Earth Observatory of Singapore (EOS), the National Research Foundation Singapore and the Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centres of Excellence initiative. L.B. is supported by the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA). This work comprises EOS contribution 344. We thank R. Jolivet, T. Ragon, T. Gerya, S. Barbot, F. Capitanio, J. Ruh, N. Lapusta, M.-A. Meier, S. Michel and A. Gualandi for constructive comments and discussions. We thank J.-P. Avouac for his help in preparing the manuscript. We are grateful to T. Ragon for providing us with data of the Gorkha event, S. Kufner for sharing a raw figure on the lithospheric structure of the Hindu Kush and to A. Webb for providing us with a geological map of the Himalayan arc.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, CA, USA

Luca Dal Zilio

Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

György Hetényi

Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

Judith Hubbard

Commissariat à l‘Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), Arpajon, France

Laurent Bollinger

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the research, writing, figure preparation and editing of this Review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Dal Zilio .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information.

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A belt of the Earth’s crust involved in the formation of mountains, owing to tectonic plate convergence.

Repeating process during which mechanical stress slowly builds up on a fault over a long period (interseismic period, years to centuries), is rapidly released in an earthquake (coseismic period, seconds to tens of seconds) and experiences a period of stress adjustment following coseismic slip (post-seismic relaxation, weeks to months).

Loss of landscape mass leading to a reduction in elevation and relief of a landscape, driven by erosion and chemical weathering.

The body of rock below a non-vertical fault.

The body of rock above a non-vertical fault.

Earthquakes where fault slip does not reach the Earth’s surface and, hence, do not produce a fault scarp.

Process by which material from the lower (subducting) plate is removed and added to the upper plate by tectonic processes, such as imbricate thrusting and/or folding and thrusting.

A mechanical term referring to the response of a fault to applied stress during the interseismic period. A fault that is frictionally locked does not slip, despite the application of stress.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Dal Zilio, L., Hetényi, G., Hubbard, J. et al. Building the Himalaya from tectonic to earthquake scales. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2 , 251–268 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00143-1

Download citation

Accepted : 21 January 2021

Published : 02 March 2021

Issue Date : April 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00143-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Tectonic significance of the 2021 lamjung, nepal, mid-crustal seismic cluster.

  • Bharat Prasad Koirala
  • Marine Laporte
  • Lok Bijaya Adhikari

Earth, Planets and Space (2023)

Reconciling patterns of long-term topographic growth with coseismic uplift by synchronous duplex thrusting

  • Yuqing Zhang
  • Hanlin Chen

Nature Communications (2023)

Himalayan valley-floor widths controlled by tectonically driven exhumation

  • Fiona J. Clubb
  • Simon M. Mudd
  • Hugh D. Sinclair

Nature Geoscience (2023)

The 2023 Earthquake in Türkiye and Implications for China’s Response to Catastrophe

  • Lianyou Liu
  • Yintong Zhang

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science (2023)

An updated earthquake catalogue and seismic regimes in the northwest Himalaya: Seismic periodicity associated with strong earthquakes

  • Vivek G Babu
  • Naresh Kumar

Journal of Earth System Science (2023)

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

himalayan geology research paper

Book cover

Geodynamics of the Indian Plate pp 363–393 Cite as

Geological Evolution of the Himalayan Mountains

  • A. K. Jain 7  
  • First Online: 29 February 2020

1010 Accesses

3 Citations

Part of the Springer Geology book series (SPRINGERGEOL)

The Indian continental lithospheric (ICL) Plate did not collide with Asia, initially due to the presence of vast Neo-Tethyan Ocean. Instead, the ICL first subducted beneath the Trans-Himalayan Ladakh magmatic arc at ~58 Ma to produce the ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphosed Tso Morari Crystallines (TMC). The Himalaya first emerged from this deeply subducted terrane between 53 and 50 Ma, followed by sequential subduction and imbrications of the ICL. It was repeatedly metamorphosed during ~45–35 and ~25–15 Ma and had undergone episodic exhumation during rise of the Himalaya since 45 Ma, whose erosion brought huge sediments in the Cenozoic Himalayan foreland basin.

Sub-horizontal subduction of the Indian Plate beneath the Himalaya caused accretion/imbrication of the upper crust by ongoing northward episodic push, which caused southward-directed thrusts. True signature of continental collision can only be identified along the Bangong-Nujiang Suture (BNS) Zone in Central Tibet with opposite downward convergence of the India and Asian Plates.

  • India-Asia convergence
  • Geometry Indian Plate
  • Continental subduction vs. collision

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
  • Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Aitchison JC, Ali JR, Davis AM (2007) When and where did India and Asia collide? J Geophys Res 112:B05423. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004706

Argand E (1924) La tectoniquedel’ Asie. Proc 13th Int Geol Cong 7:170–372

Google Scholar  

Arora BR, Unsworth MJ, Rawat G (2007) Deep resistivity structure of the northwest Indian Himalaya and its tectonic implications. Geophys Res Lett 34:L04307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL029165

Article   Google Scholar  

Beaumont C, Jamieson RA, Nguyen MH, Lee B (2001) Himalayan tectonics explained by extrusion of a low-viscosity crustal channel coupled to focused surface denudation. Nature 414:738–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/414738a

Bhargava ON (2008) An updated introduction to the Spiti geology. J Palaeont Soc India 53(2):93–129

Bhargava ON, Srikantia SV (2014) Geology and age of metamorphism of the Jutogh and Vaikrita Thrust Sheets, Himachal Himalaya. Himalayan Geol 35(1):1–15

Bhatia SB, Bhargava ON (2006) Biochronological continuity of the Paleocene sediments of the Himalayan Foreland Basin: paleontological and other evidences. J Asian Earth Sci 26:477–487

Bouilhol P, Jagoutz O, Hanchar JM, Dudas FO (2013) Dating the India-Eurasia collision through arc magmatic records. Earth Planet Sci Lett 366:163–175

Burchfiel BC, Royden LH (1985) North-south extension within the convergent Himalayan region. Geology 13:679–682

Caldwell WB, Klemperer SL, Lawrence JF, Rai SS, Ashish (2013) Characterizing the Main Himalayan Thrust in the Garhwal Himalaya, India with receiver function CCP stacking. Earth Planet Sci Lett 367:15–27

Carosi R, Montomoli C, Iaccarino S (2018) 20 years of geological mapping of the metamorphic core across Central and Eastern Himalayas. Earth-Sci Rev 177:124–138

Chemenda AI, Burg JP, Mattauer M (2000) Evolutionary model of the Himalaya–Tibet system: geopoem based on new modeling, geological and geophysical data. Earth Planet Sci Lett 174:397–409

Clift PD (2017) Cenozoic sedimentary records of climate-tectonic coupling in the Western Himalaya. Prog Earth Planet Sci 4:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-017-0151-8

Copley A, Avouac JP, Royer JY (2010) India-Asia collision and the Cenozoic slowdown of the Indian plate: implications for the forces driving plate motions. J Geophys Res 95:B03410. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006634

de Sigoyer J, Chavagnac V, Blichert-Toft J, Villa IM, Luais B, Guillot S, Cosca M, Mascle G (2000) Dating the Indian continental subduction and collisional thickening in the northwest Himalaya: multichronology of the Tso Morari eclogites. Geology 28:487–490

Dewey JF, Bird JM (1970) Mountain belts and the new global tectonics. J Geophys Res 75:2625–2647

Dupont-Nivet G, van Hinsbergen DJJ, Torsvik TH (2010) Persistently low Asian paleolatitudes: implications for the India-Asia collision history. Tectonics 29:TC5016. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008TC002437

Foster G, Kinny P, Vance D, Prince C, Harris N (2000) The significance of monazite U-Th-Pb age data in metamorphic assemblage; a combined study of monazite and garnet chronometry. Earth Planet Sci Lett 181:327–340

Garzanti E, van Haver T (1988) The Indus clastics: forearc basin sedimentation in the Ladakh Himalaya (India). Sediment Geol 59:237–249

Garzanti E, Baud A, Mascle G (1987) Sedimentary record of the northward flight of India and its collision with Eurasia (Ladakh Himalaya, India). Geodynam Acta 1:297–312

Godin L, Grujic D, Law RD, Searle MP (2006) Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation in continental collision zones: an introduction. In: Law RD, Searle MP, Godin L (eds) Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation in continental collision zones, Geol Soc Spec Publ, vol 268. Geological Society, London, pp 1–23

Gokarn SG, Gupta G, Rao CK, Selvaraj CB (2002) Electrical structure across the Indus Tsangpo suture and Shyok suture zones in NW Himalaya using magnetotelluric studies. Geophys Res Lett 29(8):1251. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014325

Grujic D (2006) Channel flow and continental collision tectonics. In: Law RD, Searle MP, Godin L (eds) Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation in continental collision zones, Geol Soc Spec Publ, vol 268. Geological Society, London, pp 25–37

Guillot S, de Sigoyer J, Lardeaux JM, Mascle G (1997) Eclogitic metasediments from the Tso Morari area (Ladakh, Himalaya): evidence for continental subduction during India-Asia convergence. Contrib Mineral Petrol 128:197–212

Guillot S, Mahéo G, de Sigoyer J, Hattori KH, Pêcher A (2008) Tethyan and Indian subduction viewed from the Himalayan high-to ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks. Tectonophysics 451:225–241

Guo X, Li W, Gao R, Xu X, Li H, Huang X, Ye Z, Lu Z, Klemper SL (2017) Nonuniform subduction of the Indian crust beneath the Himalayas. Sci Rep 7:12497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12908-0

Heim A, Gansser A (1939) Central Himalaya: geological observations of the Swiss expedition, Mem de la Société Helvetique des Sci Naturelles, vol 73. Gebrüder Fretz, Zürich. 245p

Hodges KV (2000) Tectonics of the Himalaya and southern Tibet from two perspectives. Geol Soc Am Bull 92:324–350

Hofmann M, Linnemann U, Rai V, Becker S, Gärtner A, Sagawe A (2011) The India and South China cratons at the margin of Rodinia—Synchronous Neoproterozoic magmatism revealed by LA-ICP-MS zircon analyses. Lithos 123:176–187

Honegger K, Dietrich V, Frank W, Gansser A, Thoni M, Trommsdorff V (1982) Magmatism and metamorphism in the Ladakh Himalaya the Indus-Tsangpo suture zone. Earth Planet Sci Lett 60:253–292

Israil M, Tyagi DK, Gupta PK, Niwas S (2008) Magnetotelluric investigations for imaging electrical structure of Garhwal Himalayan corridor, Uttarakhand, India. J Earth Syst Sci 97:189–200

Jain AK (2014) When did India-Asia collide and make the Himalaya? Curr Sci 106(2):254–266

Jain AK, Manickavasagam RM (1993) Inverted metamorphism in the intra-continental ductile shear zone during Himalayan collision tectonics. Geology 21:407–410

Jain AK, Singh S (2008) Tectonics of the southern Asian Plate margin along the Karakoram Shear Zone: constraints from field observations and U-Pb SHRIMP ages. Tectonophysics 451(1–4):186–205

Jain AK, Singh S (2009) Geology and tectonics of the southeastern Ladakh and Karakoram. Geological Society of India, Bangalore, India. 179p

Jain AK, Kumar D, Singh S, Kumar A, Lal N (2000) Timing, quantification and tectonic modeling of Pliocene Quaternary movements in the NW Himalaya: evidences from fission track dating. Earth Planet Sci Lett 179:437–451

Jain AK, Singh S, Manickavasagam RM (2002) Himalayan collision tectonics. Gondwana Res Group Mem 7:94

Jain AK, Singh S, Manickavasagam RM, Joshi M, Verma PK (2003) HIMPROBE Programme: integrated studies on geology, petrology, geochronology and geophysics of the Trans-Himalaya and Karakoram. Mem Geol Soc India 53:1–56

Jain AK, Manickavasagam RM, Singh S, Mukherjee S (2005) Himalayan collision zone: new perspectives - its tectonic evolution in a combined ductile shear zone and channel flow model. Himal Geol 26(1):1–18

Jain AK, Lal N, Sulemani B, Awasthi AK, Singh S, Kumar R, Kumar D (2009) Detrital-zircon fission track geochronology of the Lower Cenozoic sediments, NW Himalayan foreland basin: clues for exhumation and denudation of the Himalaya during India-Asia collision. Geol Soc Am Bull 121:519–535

Jain AK (2017) Continental subduction in the NW-Himalaya and Trans-Himalaya. Ital J Geosci 136 (1):89–102, https://doi.org/10.3301/IJG.2015.43

Jain AK, Shrestha M, Seth P, Kanyal L, Carosi R, Montomoli C, Iaccarino S, Mukherjee PK (2014) The Higher Himalayan Crystallines, Alaknanda–Dhauli Ganga Valleys, Garhwal Himalaya, India. In: Montomoli C, Carosi R, Law RD, Singh S, Rai SM (eds) Geological field trips in the Himalaya, Karakoram and Tibet. J Virtual Expl, Electr Edit 47 paper 8, ISSN 1441–8142

Kohn MJ (2014) Himalayan metamorphism and its tectonic implications. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 42:381–419

Kumar A, Lal N, Jain AK, Sorkhabi RB (1995) Late Cenozoic-Quaternary thermotectonic history of Higher Himalayan Crystallines (HHC) in Kishtwar-Padar-Zanskar region, NW Himalaya: evidence from fission track ages. J Geol Soc India 45:375–391

Kumar R, Ghosh SK, Sangode SJ (2009) Sedimentary architecture of Late Cenozoic Himalayan Foreland Basin fill: an overview. Mem Geol Soc India 78:245–280

Kumar R, Jain AK, Lal N, Singh S (2018) Early-Middle Eocene exhumation of the Trans-Himalayan Ladakh Batholith, and the India-Asia convergence. Curr Sci 113:1090–1098

Leech ML, Singh S, Jain AK, Klemperer SL, Manickavasagam RM (2005) Early, steep subduction of India beneath Asia required by early UHP metamorphism. Earth Planet Sci Lett 234:83–97

Leech ML, Singh S, Jain AK (2007) Continuous metamorphic zircon growth and interpretation of U-Pb SHRIMP dating: an example from the Western Himalaya. Int Geol Rev 49:313–328

Liang X, Sandvola E, Chen YJ, Hearn T, Ni J, Klemperer S, Shen Y, Tilmann F (2012) A complex Tibetan upper mantle: a fragmented Indian slab and no south-verging subduction of Eurasian lithosphere. Earth Planet Sci Lett 333–334:101–191

Maheo G, Bertrand H, Guillot S, Villa IM, Keller F, Capiez P (2004) The south Ladakh ophiolites (NW Himalaya, India): an intra-oceanic tholeiitic origin with implication for the closure of the Neo-Tethys. Chem Geol 203:273–303

Mandal S, Robinson DM, Khanal S, Das O (2015) Redefining the tectonostratigraphic and structural architecture of the Almora klippe and the Ramgarh-Munsiari Thrust sheet in NW India. In: Mukherjee S, Carosi R, van der Beek PA, Mukherjee BK, Robinson DM (eds) Tectonics of the Himalaya, Geol Soc London Spec Publ, vol 412. Geological Society, London, pp 247–269

Mandal S, Robinson DM, Kohn MJ, Khanal S, Das O, Bose S (2016) Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes of the Askot klippe, Kumaun, northwest India: implications for Paleoproterozoic tectonics, basin evolution and associated metallogeny of the northern Indian cratonic margin. Tectonics 35:965–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015TC004064

Miglani R, Shahrukh M, Israil M, Gupta PK, Varsheney SK, Sokolova E (2014) Geoelectric structure estimated from magnetotelluric data from Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. J Earth Syst Sci 123(8):907–918

Myrow PM, Hughes NC, Paulsen TS, Williams IS, Parcha SK, Thompson KR, Bowring SA, Peng S-C, Ahluwalia AD (2003) Integrated tectonostratigraphic reconstruction of the Himalaya and implications for its tectonic reconstruction. Earth Planet Sci Lett 212:433–441

Nábĕlek J, Hetenyi G, Vergne J, Sapkota S, Kafle B, Jiang M, Su H, Chen J, Huang B-S, The HI-CLIMB Team (2009) Underplating in the Himalaya-Tibet collision zone revealed by the Hi-CLIMB experiment. Science 325:1371–1374

Najman Y (2006) The detrital record of orogenesis: a review of approaches and techniques used in the Himalayan sedimentary basins. Earth-Sci Rev 74(1–2):1–72

Najman Y, Bickle M, Chapman H (2000) Early Himalayan exhumation: isotopic constraints from the Indian foreland basin. Terra Nova 12:28–34

Najman Y, Appel E, Boudagher-Fadel M, Bown P, Carter A, Garzanti E, Godin L, Han JT, Liebke U, Oliver G, Parrish R, Vezzoli G (2010) Timing of India-Asia collision: geological, biostratigraphic, and palaeomagnetic constraints. J Geophys Res 95:B12416

Nelson KD, Zhao W, Brown LD, Indepth Team (1996) Partially molten middle crust beneath southern Tibet: synthesis of Project INDEPTH results. Science 274:1684–1688

Ni JF, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. J Geophys Res 89:947–963

O’Brien PJ, Zotov N, Law R, Khan MA, Jan MQ (2001) Coesite in Himalayan eclogite and implications for models of India-Asia collision. Geology 29(5):435–438

Patel RC, Carter A (2009) Exhumation history of the Higher Himalayan Crystalline along Dhauliganga-Goriganga river valleys, NW India: new constraints from fission-track analysis. Tectonics 28:TC3004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008TC002373

Patel RC, Adlakha V, Lal N, Singh P, Kumar Y (2009) Spatiotemporal variation in exhumation of the Crystallines in the NW-Himalaya, India: constraints from Fission Track dating analysis. Tectonophysics 504(1–4):1–13

Powell CMA, Conaghan PJ (1973) Plate tectonics and the Himalayas. Earth Planet Sci Lett 20(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(73)90134-9

Powell CMA, Conaghan PJ (1975) Tectonic models of the Tibetan plateau. Geology 3:727–731. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1975)3<727:TMOTTP>2.0.CO;2

Rahaman W, Singh SK, Sinha R, Tandon SK (2009) Climate control on erosion distribution over the Himalaya during the past ~100 ka. Geology 37(6):559–562. https://doi.org/10.1130/G25425A.1

Rai SS, Priestley K, Gaur VK, Mitra S, Singh MP, Searle MP (2006) Configuration of the Indian Moho beneath the NW Himalaya. Geophys Res Lett 33:L15308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026076

Rawat G, Arora BR, Gupta PK (2014) Electrical resistivity cross-section across the Garhwal Himalaya: proxy to fluid-seismicity linkage. Tectonophysics 637:68–79

Rolland Y, Pêcher A, Picard C (2000) Middle Cretaceous back-arc formation and arc evolution along the Asian margin: the Shyok Suture Zone in northern Ladakh NW Himalaya. Tectonophysics 325:145–173

Rolland Y, Picard C, Pêcher A, Lapierre H, Bosch D, Keller F (2002) The cretaceous Ladakh arc of NW Himalaya—slab melting and melt-mantle interaction during fast northward drift of Indian Plate. Chem Geol 182:139–178

Schlup M, Carter A, Cosca M, Steck A (2003) Exhumation history of eastern Ladakh revealed by 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and fission track ages: the Indus river-Tso Morari transect, NW Himalaya. J Geol Soc Lond 160:385–399

Sciunnach D, Garzanti E (2012) Subsidence history of the Tethys Himalaya. Earth-Sci Rev 111:179–198

Searle MP, Windley BF, Coward MP, Cooper DJW, Rex AJ, Rex D, Tingdong L, Xuchang X, Jan MQ, Thakur VC, Kumar S (1987) The closing of the Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya. Geol Soc Am Bull 98:678–701

Seeber L, Armbruster JG, Quittmeyer R (1981) Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan Arc. In: Gupta HK, Delany FM (eds) Zagros, Hindu Kush, Himalaya geodynamic evolution, Geodynamic Series, vol 4. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 215–242

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Singh IB (1999) Tectonic control on sedimentation in Ganga Plain Foreland Basin: constraints on the Siwalik sedimentation models. In: Jain AK, Manickavasagam RM (eds) Geodynamics of the NW Himalaya, Gondwana Res Group Mem, vol 6. Gondwana Research Group, Gondwana, pp 3–37

Sorkhabi RB, Jain AK, Itaya T, Fukui S, Lal N, Kumar A (1997) Cooling age record of domal uplift in the core of the Higher Himalayan Crystallines (HHC) southwest Zanskar, India. Proc Indian Acad Sci Earth Planet Sci 106:169–179

Sorkhabi RB, Stump E, Foland K, Jain AK (1999a) Tectonics and cooling history of the Garhwal Higher Himalaya (Bhagirathi Valley): constraints from thermochronological data. In: Jain AK, Manickavasagam RM (eds) Geodynamics of the NW Himalaya, Gondwana Res Group Mem, vol 6. Gondwana Research Group, Gondwana, pp 217–235

Sorkhabi RB, Valdiya KS, Arita K (1999b) Cenozoic uplift of the Himalayan Orogen: chronologic and kinematic patterns. In: Jain AK, Manickavasagam RM (eds) Geodynamics of the NW Himalaya, Gondwana Res Group Mem, vol 6. Gondwana Research Group, Gondwana, pp 189–206

Srikantia SV, Bhargava ON (1998) Geology of Himachal Pradesh, Mem Geol Soc India. Geological Society of India, Bangalore. 406p

Stampfli GM, Borel GD (2002) A plate tectonic model for the Paleozoic and Mesozoic constrained by dynamic plate boundaries and restored synthetic oceanic isochrons. Earth Planet Sci Lett 196(1):17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00588-X

Stŭbner K, Grujic D, Dunkl I, Thiede R, Eugster P (2018) Pliocene episodic exhumation and the significance of the Munsiari thrust in the northwestern Himalaya. Earth Planet Sci Lett 481:273–283

Tandon SK (1991) The Himalayan foreland: focus on Siwalik basin. In: Tandon SK, Pant CC, Casshyap SM (eds) Sedimentary basins of India. Gyanodaya Prakashk, Nainital, pp 171–201

Tapponier P, Peltzer G, Le Dain AY, Armijo R, Cobbing P (1982) Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insight from simple experiments with plasticene. Geology 10:69–616

Thakur VC (1993) Geology of the Western Himalaya. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 355p

Thiede RC, Ehlers TA (2013) Large spatial and temporal variations in Himalayan denudation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 371–372:278–293

Thiede RC, Ehlers TA, Bookhagen B, Strecker MR (2009) Erosional variability along the northwest Himalaya. J Geophys Res 114:F1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001010

Valdiya KS (1980) Geology of the Kumuan Lesser Himalaya. Wadia Inst Himalayan Geol, Dehradun, p 291p

Valdiya KS (2016) The making of India geodynamic evolution. Springer, Switzerland, p 924p

Book   Google Scholar  

van Hinsbergen DJJ, Lippert PC, Dupont-Nivet G, McQuarrie N, Doubrovine PV, Spakman W, Torsvik TH (2012) Greater India Basin hypothesis and a two-stage Cenozoic collision between India and Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7659–7664

Webb AAG, An Y, Harrison TM, Julien C, Burgess WP (2007) The leading edge of the Greater Himalayan Crystalline complex revealed in the NW Indian Himalaya: Implications for the evolution of the Himalayan orogen. Geology 35:955–958. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23931A.1

Webb AAG, Guo H, Clift PD, Husson L, Müller T, Costantino D, Yin A, Xu ZC, Qin W (2017) The Himalaya in 3D: slab dynamics controlled mountain building and monsoon intensification. Lithosphere 9:L636.1. https://doi.org/10.1130/L636.1

Winslow DM, Zeitler PK, Chamberlain CP, Williams IS (1996) Geochronologic constraints on syntaxial development in the Nanga Parbat region, Pakistan. Tectonics 15:1292–1308

Yin A (2006) Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation. Earth Sci Rev 76:1–31

Zhao W, Nelson KD, Project INDEPTH Team (1993) Deep seismic reflection evidence for continental underthrusting beneath southern Tibet. Nature 302:557–559

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter has emerged from many field expeditions in Karakoram, Ladakh and adjoining regions, which were funded by Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi. Sandeep Singh from the IIT Roorkee has been an inspiration to explore more along with many other students. Thanks are due to Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi, for the awards of Senior and Honorary Scientist Schemes and to Dr. N. Gopikrishnan, Director, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, for the facilities.

Discussions with V.C. Thakur and P.K. Mukherjee (Dehradun) on tectonics of Ladakh and Md. Israil and V.K. Gahlaut on geophysical aspects were extremely useful in clearing many doubts. O.N. Bhargava has been instrumental in highlighting many shortcomings in this write-up and also contributing to the geology of the Tethys.

Thanks are due to S.K. Tandon and Neal Gupta for the invitation to write this chapter and for providing critical comments on this chapter. The author appreciates gesture of Md Israil and B.R. Arora for providing me the original drawings of Fig. 10.10 .

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, India

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

CEdR/academic LLC, Boston, MA, USA

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Sampat K. Tandon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Jain, A.K. (2020). Geological Evolution of the Himalayan Mountains. In: Gupta, N., Tandon, S. (eds) Geodynamics of the Indian Plate. Springer Geology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15989-4_10

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15989-4_10

Published : 29 February 2020

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-15988-7

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-15989-4

eBook Packages : Earth and Environmental Science Earth and Environmental Science (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research

Introduction to Himalayan tectonics: a modern synthesis

ORCID logo

  • Published: October 08, 2019
  • Standard View
  • Open the PDF for in another window
  • View This Citation
  • Add to Citation Manager

Michael P. Searle, Peter J. Treloar, 2019. "Introduction to Himalayan tectonics: a modern synthesis", Himalayan Tectonics: A Modern Synthesis, P. J. Treloar, M. P. Searle

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • Permissions

The Himalaya resulted from collision of the Indian plate with Asia and are well known as the highest, youngest and one of the best studied continental collision orogenic belts. They are frequently used as the type example of a continental collision orogenic belt in studies of older Phanerozoic orogenic belts. The beauty of the Himalaya is that, on a broad scale they form a relatively simple orogenic belt. The major structural divisions, the Indus–(Yarlung Tsangpo) suture zone, the Tethyan Himalaya sedimentary units, Greater Himalaya Sequence (GHS) metamorphic rocks, the Lesser Himalaya fold-and-thrust belt and the Sub-Himalaya Siwalik molasse basin are present along the entire 2000 km length of the Himalaya ( Figs 1 & 2 ). Likewise, the major structures, the Indus–Yarlung Tsangpo suture with north-vergent backthrusts, the South Tibetan Detachment (STD) low-angle normal fault, locally called the Zanskar Shear zone in the west, the Main Central Thrust (MCT) zone and the Main Boundary Thrust are all mapped along the entire length of the mountain belt between the western (Nanga Parbat) and eastern (Namche Barwa) syntaxes. Klippen of low-grade or unmetamorphosed sedimentary rocks lie above the GHS high-grade rocks in places (e.g. Chamba klippe in India; Lingshi klippe in Bhutan), and far-travelled klippen of GHS rocks occur in places south of the main MCT and GHS rocks (e.g. Darjeeling klippe).

Geological map of the Himalaya.

Geological map of the Himalaya.

Photograph taken from the Space Shuttle looking west along the Himalaya with the outline of the major structural divisions and major faults of the Himalaya. Photo courtesy of NASA.

Photograph taken from the Space Shuttle looking west along the Himalaya with the outline of the major structural divisions and major faults of the Himalaya. Photo courtesy of NASA.

In broad terms the timing of major events shows little variation along the entire mountain range, with Late Cretaceous–Paleocene obduction of ophiolites onto the passive margin of India, Late Paleocene ultra-high-pressure (UHP) metamorphism at Kaghan (northern Pakistan) and Tso Morari (India), Early Eocene final marine sedimentation prior to the closure of Neo-Tethys, and Late Eocene to Early Miocene regional Barrovian-type metamorphism along the GHS ( Fig. 3 ). Peak kyanite grade metamorphism (Late Eocene–Oligocene) pre-dates the regional higher-temperature, lower-pressure sillimanite ± cordierite-grade event, which was accompanied by widespread migmatization and mid-crustal melting during the Oligocene–Mid-Miocene. The age of the abundant leucogranite sills and dykes along the top of the GHS, beneath the STD, is concomitant with the sillimanite-grade metamorphic event. The GHS metamorphism is all part of one continuum of crustal thickening and shortening, increasing pressure and temperature following a standard clockwise Pressure-Temperature-Time ( PTt ) path. Decompression melting peaked with widespread partial melting and formation of migmatites and leucogranites along the highest peaks of the Himalaya. Structural mapping and timing constraints suggest the large-scale southward extrusion of a partially melted layer of mid-crustal rocks (sillimanite grade gneisses and leucogranites) bounded by the STD ductile shear zone with right-way-up metamorphic isograds above, and the MCT ductile shear zone with inverted metamorphic isograds below, during the Oligocene–Early Miocene. This corresponds to the channel flow (or channel tunnelling) model that is now widely accepted for the GHS ductile structures. Brittle folding and thrusting processes characterize the Lesser Himalaya, structurally below the ductile MCT, and corresponds to the critical taper model. The most recent comprehensive reviews of the structure, metamorphism and tectonic evolution of the Himalaya are given by Kohn (2014) , Searle (2015) and Goscombe et al. (2018) .

Photograph of the central Himalaya in Nepal and plateau of Tibet showing the major high peaks, courtesy of NASA.

Photograph of the central Himalaya in Nepal and plateau of Tibet showing the major high peaks, courtesy of NASA.

The relatively straightforward structural and metamorphic geometry, and timing constraints along the main Himalayan range are, however, complicated in the two syntaxis regions, the Nanga Parbat–Haramosh syntaxis in the NW (Pakistan), and the Namche Barwa syntaxis (SE Tibet) in the NE. In both these regions, a younger high-temperature metamorphic overprint on the standard Late Eocene–Miocene Himalayan events is apparent with high-grade sillimanite + cordierite crustal melting occurring in the deep basement, as young as Pliocene or even Pleistocene in age. This young metamorphism may be indicative of active metamorphism that is occurring at depth beneath the Himalaya today in rocks that have not yet been exhumed by thrusting, exhumation and erosion. The relatively straightforward tectonic picture along the main Himalayan range is also complicated in the Pakistan sector, west of Nanga Parbat, where the high-grade kyanite and sillimanite metamorphism has recently been dated as Ordovician, not Himalayan in age ( Palin et al. 2018 ). In Zanskar there is also debate over the timing of the obduction of the Spontang ophiolite onto the Zanskar passive margin sequence, and the relative importance of pre-India–Asia collision folding and thrusting related to the final stages of the obduction, and post- India–Asia collision shortening and thickening.

History of research

The Himalaya have always been at the forefront of geodetic studies. The Great Trigonometrical Survey, started in 1802 under its founder William Lambton and his successor George Everest, mapped out the Himalayan ranges for the first time. Amongst the many great achievements of the Survey, these surveyors accurately determined the heights of most of the highest peaks of the Himalaya and Karakoram, and measured gravity anomalies that led to the development of the theory of isostasy. Richard Oldham joined the Survey of India in 1879 and made the first detailed observation of a large Himalayan earthquake, the Great Assam earthquake of 1879 ( Oldham 1917 ). Oldham first identified on seismograms the arrivals of primary (P-waves), secondary (S-waves) and tertiary surface waves, previously predicted by mathematical theory. The earliest geological and geographical explorations of the Himalaya were made in the late 1800s and early 1900s. In 1907 Colonel S.G. Burrard , Superintendent of the Trigonometrical Survey, and H.H. Hayden, Superintendent of the Geological Survey of India, published four volumes of their classic work A Sketch of the Geography and Geology of the Himalaya Mountains and Tibet . During the late 1800s geologists like Medlicott, Middlemiss and Oldham made significant discoveries in the western Himalaya, and Mallet and von Loczy first discovered the inverted metamorphic gradient in the Darjeeling klippe.

The next breakthrough was the publication of Arnold Heim and Augusto Gansser's Central Himalaya: Observations from the Swiss Expedition of 1936 ( Heim & Gansser 1939 ), and Augusto Gansser's classic Geology of the Himalaya , published in 1964 . Heim and Gansser discovered the remnant ophiolites of SW Tibet in the Kiogar–Amlang-la Range, laid the foundations for the stratigraphy of the Indian plate and confirmed the inverted nature of metamorphism along the Main Central Thrust. Other great pioneering geologists were D.N. Wadia, who mapped large tracts of the NW Frontier region, J.B. Auden and K.S. Valdiya, who worked along the central Indian Himalaya, Ardito Desio, who led the first successful ascent of K2 and mapped a large tract of the Baltoro Karakoram in 1955, and Rashid Khan Tahirkheli, a heroic Pakistani geologist who mapped large parts of remote Kohistan during the 1970s. This work was continued by the studies of Qasim Jan and Asif Khan and their students from the University of Peshawar. A regional map of the Central Karakoram Mountains covering the Hunza, Hispar, Biafo and Baltoro glacier region at the scale of 1:250,000 was published by Searle (1991) and a large compilation geological map of North Pakistan at scale of 1:650 000 was published by Searle & Khan (1996) .

Some of the most important early geological mapping in the Indian Himalaya was carried out by K.S. Valdiya and his colleagues from Kumaon University, working mainly in the Garhwal–Kumaon Himalaya, and Vikram Thakur and colleagues from the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun, working mainly in Himachal Pradesh, Lahoul–Spiti and Ladakh. More advances were made by the field studies of A.K. Jain and Sandeep Singh and their students from the Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, and Talat Ahmad and colleagues from the universities of Kashmir and Delhi (Jamia Islamia University). With the opening of Ladakh to foreigners in 1979–80 geologists from Italy, Switzerland, France and the UK were also active in the Indian Himalaya throughout the 1980s and 1990s. In many respects this was the golden age of Himalayan research when vast tracts of geologically unknown mountain ranges were mapped and studied for the first time. Emphasis gradually shifted during the 1990s and 2000s from standard sedimentology, stratigraphy, palaeontology and structural mapping to more detailed metamorphic, thermobarometric and geochronological studies of the Himalaya.

In Nepal, the great pioneers of geological mapping include the Swiss Toni Hagen, who over 20 years trekked across large tracts of the country ( Hagen 1960 ), Pierre Bordet in the Thakkhola and Nvi-Shang regions ( Bordet et al. 1971 , 1975 ) and in the Makalu region ( Bordet 1961 ), and Michel Colchen, Patrick LeFort and Arnaud Pêcher in the Manaslu region ( Colchen et al. 1986) . Climbers contributed greatly to the early pioneering studies of Mount Everest. Noel Odell was a geologist–mountaineer on the 1924 British Everest expedition and was the last person to see Mallory and Irvine heading up the NNE ridge towards the summit. Odell made many original geological observations on their journey from Darjeeling and Sikkim to the Tibetan side of Everest, and collected many samples. Lawrence Wager made an invaluable collection of rock samples from the north side of Mount Everest during the 1933 British Expedition led by Hugh Ruttledge. Waters et al. (2018) published a detailed metamorphic–thermobarometric analysis of the Wager samples in 2018, more than 80 years after he collected them. A detailed geological map of the Mount Everest region in Nepal and South Tibet at scale of 1:100 000 was published by Searle (2003) , reprinted in 2007 with the addition of the Makalu and Barun glacier region.

In Tibet, the great Swedish explorer Sven Hedin made four expeditions to Central Asia spanning 1893–1935, especially the Trans-Himalayan ranges of southern Tibet, and left an astonishingly large collection of rock samples ( Hedin 1909 , 1917 ). With the opening of Tibet to foreigners in the late 1970s and early 1980s, several groups, both Chinese and foreigners, began the huge task of mapping the vast plateau region. A Royal Society expedition traversed the plateau from Lhasa to Golmud and published the first reconnaissance studies ( Chengfa et al. 1988 ; Shackleton et al. 1988 ). A large group of French researchers led by Paul Tapponnier made more detailed studies, particularly of the active fault systems over c. 20 years of geological research across much of the plateau. Large-scale geophysical experiments, notably the four phases of the American- and Chinese-funded INDEPTH seismic profile, coupled with magnetotelluric and heat flow studies, spanned more than 20 years of work, and determined the large-scale structure of the lower crust and mantle across the Tibetan Plateau from the northern flank of the Himalaya north to the Kun Lun.

During the 1980s Western geologists started to map and describe the geology of the Himalaya in much more detail. The opening of the Ladakh–Zanskar region to foreigners during the late 1970s opened up this fascinating and remote region to geological research. Sporadic, but ongoing, political problems in Kashmir affected access to some critical areas in the western Himalaya. The first Himalaya–Karakoram–Tibet (HKT) Workshop meeting was convened by Mike Searle at the University of Leicester in 1985, and brought together for the first time a wide range of Asian, European and American geologists. The first talk in the first HKT conference was given by the ‘father of Himalayan geology’, Augusto Gansser. The meeting was so successful that it was decided to hold an annual HKT meeting, alternating between the Himalayan countries in Pakistan, India, Nepal and China, and Europe or further afield in Canada, the USA, Japan and Hong Kong. HKT meetings were held in Kathmandu in 1994 and 2012, in Peshawar, Pakistan in 1998, in Gangtok, Sikkim in 2002, in Leh, Ladakh in 2008, and in Dehra Dun, India in 2015. These HKT conferences continue to this day and the community is thriving ( Fig. 4 ). The seventh HKT meeting held in Oxford University in April 1992 (convened by Mike Searle and Peter Treloar) led to GSL Special Publication 74, Himalayan Tectonics , published in 1993 ( Treloar & Searle 1993 ).

Locations of all the Himalaya–Karakoram–Tibet (HKT) Workshop meetings and conferences; map courtesy of S. Subedi and G. Hetényi (with permission).

Locations of all the Himalaya–Karakoram–Tibet (HKT) Workshop meetings and conferences; map courtesy of S. Subedi and G. Hetényi (with permission).

Containing 39 papers over some 600 pages, this volume continues to be widely cited today. Most of the ensuing science has been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. However, a number of thematic volumes have been published that deal with specific aspects of the Himalaya. These include: GSL Special Publication 170, Tectonics of the Nanga Parbat Syntaxis and Western Himalaya ( 2000 , edited by Asif Khan , Peter Treloar, Mike Searle and Qasim Jan), The Tectonic Evolution of Asia (1996, edited by An Yin and Mark Harrison), Himalaya and Tibet ( 1999 , GSA Special Paper 328, edited by Allison Macfarlane , Rasoul Sorkhabi and JayQuade), Channel Flow, Ductile Extrusion and Exhumation in Continental Collision zones ( 2006 , GSL Special Publication 268, edited by Rick Law , Mike Searle and Laurent Godin). The most recent contributions are Tectonics of the Himalaya ( 2015 , GSL Special Publication 412, edited by S. Mukherjee , R. Carosi, P. van der Beek, B. Mukherjee and D. Robinson) and Crustal Architecture and evolution of the Himalaya–Karakoram–Tibet Orogen ( 2018 GSL Special Publication 481, edited by R. Sharma , I. Villa and S. Kumar).

Tectonic processes and outstanding problems–Himalaya–Karakoram–Tibet

Palaeogeography of India and the northward drift of the Indian plate . Following the break-up of the Gondwana continental blocks, the northward drift of India since c. 140 Ma has been documented through palaeomagnetic studies. An abrupt slowing down of the Indian plate at c. 50 Ma at equatorial latitudes is generally thought to be coincident with the initial collision of India with Asia. Palaeogeographic reconstructions differ on the extent of Indian crust and whether an ‘extra’ ocean is required – the so-called ‘Greater Indian Basin’ ( van Hinsbergen et al. 2012 ). As no oceanic rocks or ophiolites are known along the MCT zone, this model has been rejected by field geologists. Greater India was one contiguous plate and rock units can be matched across from Lesser–Greater–Tethyan Himalaya to the passive continental margin.

Proterozoic–Paleozoic evolution of the Indian plate and importance of the Cambrian–Ordovician Bhimpedian orogeny . Important Cambrian and Ordovician metamorphic and magmatic units have been known along the Lesser Himalaya and klippen such as the Kathmandu klippe for a long time. Recently, kyanite and sillimanite grade gneisses below the Main Mantle Thrust in Pakistan have been dated as Ordovician ( Palin et al. 2018 ), and the relative lack of a Himalayan overprinting has been a surprising result. Future lines of research may be able to distinguish the extent of the Paleozoic orogenic influence in Himalayan rocks overprinted by Cenozoic metamorphism and deformation.

Timing of India–Asia collision along the Indus(–Yarlung Tsangpo) suture zone . The precise timing of India–Asia collision has been hotly debated for at least the last 30 years, with proposed ages ranging from c. 65 Ma to as young as 37 Ma. Much depends on exactly how one defines ‘collision’. Is it the first meeting of Indian continental crust with Asia, or is it the final disappearance of the Tethyan ocean that once separated the two plates? Various geological factors have been used to define the age of collision including palaeomagnetism (slow-down of northward drift of India), the age of UHP rocks along the northern margin of India (Kaghan and Tso Morari eclogites), the final marine sediments within the suture zone, the earliest clasts derived from Asia (Ladakh–Gangdese granites) in the Indus suture molasse deposits, the ending of calc-alkaline magmatism and volcanism along the south Asian margin (Ladakh–Gangdese batholith). UHP eclogites cannot be used to constrain collision as they are known from areas where continental collision has not yet occurred (e.g. Oman, Papua, New Guinea). In these examples subduction of the leading edge of the previously passive continental margin was the final stage of ophiolite obduction processes, not related to continent–continent collision ( Searle & Treloar 2010 ). The most accurate timing of India–Asia collision is the precise foraminifera zonation of the final marine sediments along the suture zone, which are planktonic foraminifera zone P7-8 in Waziristan, Ladakh and South Tibet, at 50.5 Ma ( Green et al. 2008 ). However, this age records the last marine sedimentation within the suture zone, not necessarily the first meeting of Indian and Asian crust.

Evolution of the Kohistan island arc and the Shyok suture zone . The Kohistan–Dras island arc was a large, late Jurassic–Cretaceous intra-oceanic island arc sequence that lay between the Indian and Asian plates ( Jagoutz & Schmidt 2012 ). The entire 20 + km-thick sequence has been tilted to the north and accreted onto the Asian plate along the Shyok suture zone, and obducted south onto the Indian plate along the Main Mantle Thrust (MMT). The arc itself has multiple basalt–andesite–rhyolite volcanic phases spanning the Cretaceous to Early Eocene, overlying a mid-crustal amphibolite and lower crust garnet–granulite sequence (Jijal complex), intruded by the Chilas complex gabbro norites. The entire island arc sequence has been intruded by multiple granodiorite–granite intrusions related to the Trans-Himalayan (Ladakh–Gangdese) batholith. Debate continues as to whether the Shyok suture closed first accreting the arc onto Asia, or whether the Shyok and Indus sutures closed simultaneously during early collision. The geology of the Indus suture in Ladakh and south Tibet is well mapped, but the Shyok suture in Pakistan to the north remains enigmatic and poorly known.

Timing of ophiolite obduction onto the Indian plate . By definition, ophiolite obduction must have occurred prior to continent–continent collision. Since ophiolites generally form the structurally highest thrust sheet, separated from the continental margin by intermediate thrust slices of passive margin slope to basin facies sedimentary rocks that originally lay between the continental margin and the ophiolite, they were the first to be removed by erosion. Only exceptional structural features (out-of-sequence or breakback thrusts) have preserved large ophiolitic thrust sheets, such as the Spontang ophiolite, in Zanskar ( Searle et al. 1997 ). A major phase of crustal shortening and thickening occurred prior to deposition of Paleocene–Eocene shallow marine sedimentary rocks around Spontang, a deformation phase that has been ascribed to ophiolite obduction, rather than India–Asia collision. Determining the timing of upper crustal folding and thrusting along the Tethyan Himalaya is an important goal for future work.

Timing of metamorphism along and across the GHS . Following the India–Asia collision crustal thickening along the Indian plate resulted in burial and metamorphism of the Indian plate rocks. Protoliths of GHS metamorphic rocks can be correlated across to unmetamorphosed sedimentary and volcanic (Permian Panjal Trap) rocks in the Tethyan zone to the north, and to Proterozoic and Paleozoic age rocks in the Lesser Himalaya to the south. GHS rocks have protolith ages ranging from Proterozoic (Haimanta Series) through Paleozoic to Jurassic. U–Pb ages of kyanite grade rocks are generally in the range c. 45–30 Ma, and sillimanite grade rocks range from c. 30 to c. 11 Ma (see reviews in Kohn 2014 and Searle 2015 ). The youngest ages are recorded from the two syntaxis regions, Nanga Parbat in the west and Namche Barwa in the east, with ages of crustal melting as young as Pliocene–Pleistocene (3–1 Ma) in the Nanga Parbat core. More detailed geochronology, linking accessory phase dating to specific metamorphic periods and PT conditions would tie down the thermal history in greater detail.

PTt paths of rocks across the GHS . One of the major advances in the last 20 years has been the ability to match U–Pb ages on accessory minerals such as zircon, monazite, allanite and rutile to points on the pressure-temperature path of rocks. This has resulted in numerous studies relating PTt paths to prograde burial and retrograde exhumation paths across the GHS. Isochemical phase diagram (pseudosection) modelling using large datasets such as THERMOCALC has been extremely useful for interpretation of pressure–temperature data, but must be used with caution. At the outset, it must be determined whether the minerals used are in equilibrium and whether the ‘age’ obtained from an accessory mineral is actually related to the metamorphic reaction in question. Linking PTt paths with microstructures gives an extra dimension with PTtD (deformation) paths. Determining prograde and retrograde PTtD paths across major structures and being able to put a precise age on specific parts of the path has undoubtedly revolutionized our understanding of timescales of metamorphism. It is apparent now, for example that, in places rocks showing younger prograde burial PTt paths lie structurally beneath rocks showing older PTt paths, conforming to the general southward propagation of metamorphism across the GHS with time, following the regional structures. As older metamorphic slices in the north were being exhumed, younger metamorphic rocks in the south were being buried. Future research is needed to determine whether cryptic shear zones within the GHS are real structures, or whether they are metamorphic isograds. The High Himalayan Detachment ( Goscombe et al. 2006 , 2018 ), for example, may be either a ductile shear zone or the sillimanite + K-feldspar isograd marking the first appearance of migmatite melt and leucogranite sills (and possibly the base of the extruding channel). Only field-based mapping combined with well-constrained PTtD paths along the upper GHS will be able to accurately correlate many of these cryptic structures along-strike.

Nature and timing of motion along the South Tibetan Detachment low-angle normal fault . One of the major new advances in Himalayan (and other) orogenic processes has been the recognition and detailed mapping of large-scale, low-angle normal faults such as the South Tibetan Detachment, which runs for over 2000 km along-strike. The STD bounds the upper (northern) extent of the GHS metamorphic rocks and consists of a thick ductile shear zone to brittle detachment which separates high-grade gneisses, migmatites and leucogranites below from unmetamorphosed sedimentary rocks above, frequently with a large PT jump across it. Minimum offsets on the STD are in excess of 100 km along the Everest profile, and this structure was instrumental in the recognition of the ‘channel flow’ hypothesis, whereby a thick slab of partially molten middle crust (upper GHS), was extruded southward during the Early Miocene ( Searle et al. 2006 ). U–Pb dating of concordant leucogranite sills and discordant cross-cutting leucogranite dykes has tied down the timing of shearing along the STD to c. 23–15.4 Ma ( Cottle et al. 2015 ).

Origin and evolution of inverted metamorphism along the Main Central Thrust . The inverted metamorphic sequence along the base of the GHS is present along the entire >2000 km length of the orogen. The increase in pressure and temperature up-structural section from unmetamorphosed rocks of the Lesser Himalaya through low-grade metamorphic rocks, through staurolite, kyanite, sillimanite gneisses and the first appearance of partial melt in migmatites defines an inverted metamorphic sequence. The amounts of southward thrusting of GHS rocks are difficult to quantify but are thought to be similar to the minimum offsets along the STD zone at the top of the GHS. Models to explain inverted metamorphism include thrusting a hot slab over a cold slab ( LeFort 1975 ), shear heating along the MCT ( England et al. 1992 ) and the post-metamorphic folding of earlier formed metamorphic isograds ( Searle & Rex 1989 ). Field mapping of metamorphic isograds in the NW Indian Himalaya showed that right-way-up metamorphic isograds along the STD ductile shear zone (Zanskar shear zone) could be linked to inverted metamorphic isograds along the MCT ductile shear zone below (Kishtwar Window). This folded isograd geometry was the origin of the channel flow model ( Searle & Rex 1989 ; Searle et al. 2008 ).

Crustal melting and channel flow processes in the GHS . Partial melting of the crust first appears with kyanite-bearing migmatites that have been found in many parts of the GHS. The higher volume melts are related to the muscovite dehydration melt reaction with sillimanite + muscovite breaking down to sillimanite + K-feldspar + melt. These melts form a thick network of in situ migmatites, foliation-parallel sills with cross-cutting, interconnecting dykes and larger leucogranite massifs, now known to be giant sills rather than intrusive diapirs. Himalayan leucogranites have varying amounts of garnet, tourmaline and muscovite, whilst later leucogranites may contain cordierite and even andalusite as magmatic phases ( Searle et al. 2010 a ; Streule et al. 2010 a ; Visona et al. 2012 ). The leucogranites all appear in the upper GHS and are structurally truncated by the overlying STD. The larger leucogranite bodies are the Shivling–Bhagirathi mountains in India, the Manaslu, Everest–Nuptse–Makalu and Kangchenjunga massifs in Nepal, Shisha Pangma leucogranite in South Tibet, and several peaks along the upper GHS in Bhutan (Chomolhari, Masang Kang, Kula Khangri, etc.). It is a surprising fact that peak temperatures associated with melting occur in the upper part of the middle crust, never in the lower crust. This unusual structural setting can only be related to the high heat-producing elements concentrated along the NeoProterozoic black shales of the Haimanta Sequence (Cheka Sequence in Bhutan), rocks thought to be protoliths of the sillimanite gneisses and migmatites. The ‘channel flow’ model of southward extrusion of the partially molten mid-crust layer in the upper GHS, bounded by the STD low-angle normal fault above and the south-directed ductile shear zones along the upper MCT below (e.g. Godin et al. 2006 ; Searle et al. 2006 ), was derived from detailed structural mapping, combined with metamorphic petrology, thermobarometry and geochronology.

Critical taper fold-and-thrust processes along the Lesser Himalaya . Below the ductile MCT zone, rocks of the Lesser Himalaya contain brittle fold and thrust structures, typical of shallow-level fold-and-thrust belts. The controversies between channel flow and critical taper are contrived ( Webb et al. 2011 ; He et al. 2015 ). Channel flow refers to the ductile extrusion of hot migmatites and leucogranites during the Early Miocene along the GHS; critical taper models refer to brittle folding and thrusting along the Lesser Himalaya and Main Boundary thrust from about 11 Ma ago to the present ( Searle et al. 2017 ). Folding of the Lesser Himalaya formed a series of klippen (e.g. Kathmandu klippe) that are stranded remnants of GHS rocks above the Lesser Himalayan duplexes.

Timing of thrusting along the Main Boundary Thrust and infill of the Siwalik foreland basin . Ductile channel flow processes along the GHS ceased at around 13–11 Ma when thrusting propagated southwards to the Lesser Himalaya. During this time, a flexural foreland basin developed along the southern margin of the Himalaya owing to loading by the Himalayan thrust sheets and warping of the Indian plate as it underthrust the Lesser Himalaya. The Siwalik basin was infilled with sediments eroded off the rising Himalaya to the north. Dating of these sediments using detrital zircon ages, and provenance studies have shown that maximum periods of sediment accumulation in the foreland basin correspond to periods of increased rock uplift and exhumation along the Himalaya. The Siwalik-type sediments continue SW into the Indus basin and offshore Indus Fan, and also to the SE along the Ganges River to the Bhramaputra basin and Bengal Fan, where these sediments reach a thickness of over 20 km offshore the Ganges Delta.

Active thrusting and earthquakes along the Main Himalayan Thrust . Historic and recent earthquakes, particularly the 25 April 2015 magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal, have provided invaluable data on the mechanics and scale of active thrust faults. With the advances in GPS and InSAR technology, these have revealed remarkable detail on the rupture scale, timing and magnitude of slip, and uplift mechanism ( Elliott et al. 2016 ). Forensic studies on older historic earthquakes such as the magnitude 8.1 Bihar earthquake of 1934, the largest known along the Himalayan belt, can also benefit from comparisons with the better known recent earthquakes ( Bilham 2004 ).

Timing of granite magmatism, calc-alkaline volcanism along the Gangdese granite batholith . The southern margin of the Asian plate is marked by a linear granite batholith – the Ladakh–Gangdese batholith composed of calc-alkaline I-type granitoids with andesitic volcanics (Linzizong volcanics). These Andean-type granitic rocks are related to the subduction of Tethyan oceanic lithosphere northwards beneath Tibet. U–Pb zircon ages span from Late Jurassic through to Eocene time ( Chung et al. 2005) , and their ending is thought to be soon after continent–continent collision which closed off the oceanic subduction source. Small-volume, post-collision adakites are sourced from melting of a garnet-bearing lower crust eclogite or amphibolite and occur across the Tibetan plateau. At least four very large porphyry copper (and gold) deposits occur within the Gangdese batholith in south Tibet, but it remains unclear if they are related to calc-alkaline subduction-related Gangdese plutonism, or the younger Miocene lower crust-derived adakites.

Timing of crustal thickening and uplift of the Tibetan Plateau . The crustal structure and timing of uplift of the Tibetan plateau has been the source of much controversy. Some older studies presumed that the plateau uplifted as recently as 7–8 Ma based on highly convoluted reasoning and far-field effects (e.g. climate and vegetation changes in Tibet and India and changes in global ocean chemistry, etc.; Molnar et al. 1993 ). Others proposed much older uplift, even pre-collisional based on U–Pb age data from metamorphic and magmatic rocks in the Karakoram and parts of more deeply exhumed Tibetan crust ( Searle et al. 2010 b , 2011 ). It seems quite likely that southern Tibet had a topography similar to that of the present-day Andes before the collision of India, with increased and enhanced post-collision uplift concomitant with regional kyanite- and sillimanite-grade metamorphism extending back to at least 65 Ma. Certainly, erosion rates on the Tibetan plateau have been extremely low, since fission track ages extend back to at least 49 Ma. These data suggest a rather passive uplift of the Tibetan plateau rather than any homogeneous shortening that would have produced regional Cenozoic metamorphism across Tibet.

Extent of underthrusting of lower Indian crust northwards beneath the Tibetan plateau . Two end-member models to explain the double crustal thickness beneath the Tibetan plateau are wholescale underthrusting of the Indian plate beneath the whole of the plateau as first suggested by Argand (1924) , and post-collisional homogeneous crustal shortening and thickening, as first suggested by Dewey and Burke (1973) . It seems apparent that the Himalaya has absorbed at least 500 km shortening in upper crustal rocks (Proterozoic and younger). The equivalent lower crust Archean rocks that underlay these prior to collision have been underthrust north, at least half-way across the plateau ( Searle et al. 2011 ). This model is supported by several deep crustal geophysical experiments (e.g. INDEPTH, HiCLIMB) that suggest that the southern half of the plateau is underlain by cold lithospheric mantle and only the northern part of the plateau along the Kunlun has a hot asthenospheric mantle with strong east–west mantle anisotropy. This region also correlates with the youngest shoshonitic mantle-derived volcanics. Future studies might constrain mantle structure in more detail and tomographic studies might be able to delineate old, subducted slabs in the deep mantle beneath the plateau.

Timing of regional metamorphism along the southern Karakoram and Pamir gneiss domes. The southern margin of the Asian plate in the west lies along the Karakoram Mountains of north Pakistan, and far north Ladakh. Regional mapping along the Baltoro and Hushe regions, combined with structural, metamorphic and U–Pb geochronology, has constrained the southern Karakoram metamorphic complex as being mainly post-collisional kyanite- and sillimanite-bearing gneisses, migmatites and leucogranites ( Searle et al. 2010 b ). Earlier, pre-collision high-temperature, low-pressure andalusite–sillimanite metamorphism in the Hunza valley region is related more to the I-type granite batholiths along the southern margin of Asia. These regional metamorphic rocks support a post-collisional thickening event north of the suture zone, but similar rocks are not seen in Tibet, although it is possible that they remain buried and have not yet been exhumed. U–Pb ages constrain the ages of metamorphism in both the southern Karakoram and the central Pamir gneiss domes as Eocene to middle Miocene, a similar time span to that known along the Indian plate Himalaya south of the suture zone.

Geological offsets and timing of slip along the major strike-slip faults of Tibet (e.g. Karakoram, Altyn Tagh, Kun Lun, Xianshui-he, Jiale faults). Another important tectonic model originally proposed by Molnar & Tapponnier (1975) was the eastward extrusion of Tibetan crust, bounded by large-scale strike-slip faults, notably the dextral Karakoram and Jiale faults along the SW and SE, and the sinistral Altyn Tagh and Kun Lun faults along the north. Initially the geological offsets along these bounding strike-slip faults was thought to be very large (500–1000 km; Tapponnier et al. 1982 ). Subsequent detailed field structural mapping combined with U–Pb geochronology, particularly along the Karakoram fault, determined that finite geological offsets were much lower (120–35 km; Searle et al. 2010 b ), and initiation of shearing was younger than the youngest dated leucogranites (<13 Ma; Phillips et al. 2004 ). Strike-slip faulting cannot explain the uplift of the plateau, and it would appear that, despite some of these faults being extremely active (e.g. Xianshui-he fault), their total offsets are limited. More detailed mapping combined with geochronology studies is needed along many of the other active strike-slip faults on and around the margins of Tibet.

Relationship between Tibetan plateau uplift and the Indian monsoon . The link between topographic uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, Northern Hemisphere or global climate change, and initiation of the Indian monsoon has been the source of much research and speculation. The rise of the plateau certainly must have deflected the west to east air flow of the jet stream ( Molnar et al. 1993 ). The rise of the Himalaya certainly formed an abrupt back-stop to the northerly flowing Indian summer monsoon winds. Timing of uplift of the plateau and timing of uplift of the Himalaya are therefore crucial to our understanding of climate changes across Asia.

How does the Himalaya–Karakoram–Tibet orogen compare with other continent–continent collision mountain ranges back in time ? Comparisons of the HKT orogen have been made with the Proterozoic Trans-Hudson orogen of Northern Canada ( St-Onge et al. 2006 ), the Paleozoic Caledonian orogen ( Streule et al. 2010 b ) and the Variscan orogeny ( Maierova et al. 2015 ), with varying results. There do appear to be some unique features of the Himalaya and it could be argued that the HKT orogeny is unique in many aspects.

Himalayan Tectonics–A Modern Synthesis

The justification for the current volume in some ways goes back to the success of the 1993 Himalayan Tectonics volume, which provided a remarkably broad ranging set of papers that covered the full range of geography and science that the Himalaya provide us with. These papers have been and continue to be widely cited. With the possible exception of Yin & Harrison (1996) , no subsequent volume has attempted this. Twenty-five years after publication of the 1993 book, it seemed an appropriate moment to provide a wide-ranging update of what we now know about the Himalaya–Tibet–Karakoram region. Rather than doing this as a conference volume, the method employed was to invite leading scientists to write review papers in their own fields that together will provide a coherent framework on which future research can be based. We are grateful to our friends and colleagues who agreed to participate in this project and trust that 25 years down the road this volume will appear as significant as the 1993 book.

The present volume comprises a set of papers on the Himalaya, Kohistan arc, Tibet, the Karakoram and Pamir ranges that represent a review of our current understanding of the geology and processes that formed the mountain ranges we see today. The first paper by Searle (2018)   reviews the geological evidence for the timing of subduction initiation, arc formation, ophiolite obduction and final closure of NeoTethys along the Indus suture zone and Ladakh Himalaya in particular. There is a complex series of events involved here that document India–Asia plate convergence, pre-collision ophiolite emplacement, UHP metamorphism and ‘collision’ between India and Asia. It is easy to confuse features that relate to pre-collisional events with those that actually relate to the collision itself. The age of India–Asia depends on how one defines collision, but the generally accepted age, based on final marine fossiliferous sediments within the suture zone and along the north Indian plate margin, is c. 50 Ma. Myrow et al. (2018)   describe the restoration of the Himalaya using the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic stratigraphy along the Lesser Himalaya and Tethyan Himalaya. They develop a stratigraphy for the Indian Plate rocks with a Paleo-Proterozic basement >1.6 Ga, overlain by a sequence of Neo-Proterozoic sediments <1.1 Ga old. These are blanketed by Cambrian and younger sediments. Understanding this stratigraphy is key to unravelling field geology along the arc.

Two complementary papers explore the geology and evolution of the Kohistan arc in the Pakistan Himalaya. Petterson (2018)   reviews the geological history of all units forming the Kohistan island arc, one of the largest and best exposed arcs in the geological record. Kohistan exposes a c. 40–50 km structural profile through this late Jurassic–Cretaceous intra-oceanic arc from deep garnet granulites and peridotites at the base through gabbros and amphibolites to classic calc-alkaline granites and volcanics at the top. Pettersen provides an up-to-date stratigraphy and time line for the forearc region. Jagoutz et al. (2018)   present a comprehensive set of U–Pb, Hf, Nd and Sr isotopic data along the Kohistan–Ladakh arc spanning some 120 myr of geological history. They document a long-term magmatic evolution that shows a continuously increasing contribution of an enriched component derived from the subducted slab into the depleted sub-arc mantle.

Along the Himalaya the geology of the currently exposed Indian plate includes: continental shelf–slope–basin rocks at the leading edge of the plate margin, a slice of which was subducted to UHP depths of more than 100 km, as exposed in the Kaghan, Stak (Pakistan) and Tso Morari (India) eclogite belts; the Neoproterozoic to Cenozoic Tethyan sedimentary upper crust; North Himalayan domes; the Greater Himalayan metamorphic sequence; and Lesser Himalayan thrust sheets. O'Brien (2018)   reviews the geology, thermobarometry and timing of the coesite-bearing UHP eclogites in both the Kaghan and Tso Morari regions. The UHP rocks are distinctly different from the granulitized eclogites of deep levels of the GHS as seen in the Ama Drime massif, north Sikkim, NW Bhutan and the Namche Barwa syntaxis. These rocks represent deep crustal Proterozoic rocks that have been subducted beneath south Tibet and undergone Oligocene–Miocene UHP metamorphism during crustal thickening. Butler (2018)   reviews the geology of the Nanga Parbat syntaxis in northern Pakistan. He argues that feedback mechanisms implied in the tectonic aneurism models may have been over-emphasized and that patterns of ductile flow within the syntaxes are consistent with orogeny-wide gravitational flow. Treloar et al. (2019)   review the geology of the Pakistan Himalaya south of the Kohistan arc and Main Mantle Thrust. Here, kyanite- and sillimanite-grade gneisses previously thought to be the result of Himalayan age metamorphism, now reveal an important Ordovician peak thermal event (Bhimpedian orogeny), constrained by U–Pb dating of monazites, with a weaker Himalayan overprint. These rocks are clearly different from the main Himalayan GHS gneisses of Late Eocene to Mid-Miocene age, with their migmatites and leucogranites as exposed along the Zanskar Himalaya and further east to Garhwal, Nepal, Sikkim and Bhutan. They do, however, correlate with rocks along the Lesser Himalaya and Kathmandu klippe which also have Cambrian–Ordovician metamorphism and S-type granites.

A number of papers deal with the Nepalese sector of the Himalaya. Dyck et al. (2018)   describe the protolith stratigraphy of the Langtang GHS based on detrital zircon dating of the high-grade gneisses and compare the Proterozoic–Paleozoic protolith stratigraphy in the Langtang Himalaya with that of the Annapurna region to the west and the Everest region to the east. They argue that, within the context of the Northern Indian sedimentary successions, the Lesser, Greater and Tethyan Himalayan successions are structurally rather than lithologically defined. Carosi et al. (2018)   describe the structure and metamorphism of the central western Nepal region with emphasis on the High Himalayan Discontinuity, a cryptic tectono-metamorphic boundary lying above the Main Central thrust. Most data support a model for GHS metamorphism of in-sequence shearing affected by minor later out-of-sequence thrusts. Waters (2019)   provides a comprehensive and detailed review of the metamorphism of the Nepal Himalaya, in terms of pressure–temperature conditions, phase diagram (pseudosection) modelling, ductile strain and timing. The first part of his paper reviews the techniques used to constrain the metamorphic evolution of orogenic belts. The second part of the paper documents different PTt paths in the GHS below and above the ‘High Himalayan Discontinuity’ ( Goscombe et al. 2006 , 2018 ) that divides the GHS into an upper zone capable of ductile flow and a lower zone characterized by inverted metamorphic gradients and downward decreasing metamorphic ages. Kellett et al. (2018)   review the structures and metamorphism of the South Tibetan Detachment system in Nepal and South Tibet and discuss the various tectonic models including gravitational collapse, wedge extrusion, channel flow and duplexing. The STD appears to be an enigmatic and possibly unique structure, a low-angle normal fault that caps the southward extruding ductile middle crust (GHS). Jessup et al. (2019)   distinguish two type of gneiss domes along the northern Himalaya. The North Himalayan gneiss domes formed by warping of the GHS metamorphic rocks after metamorphism and are cored by granite and gneiss. The type 2 domes formed in response to orogen-parallel extension during the Late Miocene. They present a new terminology to classify the domes which helps elucidate their significance.

The Siwalik foreland basin along the southern boundary of the Lesser Himalaya preserves an erosional history of the uplift and exhumation of the Himalaya since collision. Garzanti (2019)   summarizes the stratigraphic, petrological and mineralogical evidence from the foreland basin sequence. The onset of India–Asia collision is pinned down to middle Paleocene (60–58.5 Ma) time with the first provenance of Asia plate material interbedded with Indian plate continental rise rocks. The final marine sedimentary rocks within the suture zone and along the north Indian plate margin are c. 50.5 Ma. Thus, the timing of India–Asia collision could be bracketed between these two ages. The abrupt appearance of metamorphic fragments derived from the uplifted GHS appears at c. 23 Ma.

A comprehensive review of historical seismicity along the Himalaya is provided by Bilham (2019)   . He assesses the risk and slip potential of different segments of the Himalaya and concludes that more than half the region has the potential to host a great earthquake (M w ≥ 8.0). This is particularly worrying given the magnitude of destruction and loss of life (>9000 dead, 22 000 injured) that occurred during the 25 April 2015 M w 7.8 Gorkha earthquake. This earthquake occurred at midday on a Saturday when schools were closed and most people were outdoors; if it had happened at night or during school time, the death toll would have been far greater. He argues that the death toll of a major nocturnal earthquake could exceed 100 000 owing to increased population and the vulnerability of present-day construction methods. Priestley et al. (2019)   review all the geophysical data that allow an interpretation of the deep structure of the Himalaya, including seismic, gravity and modelling. They argue that, although the gross crustal structure of much of the Himalaya is becoming better known, understanding of the internal structure is still sketchy.

The Asian margin of the India–Asia collision zone comprises the Gangdese granite belt along the southern margin of the Lhasa Block, and the northern terranes of the Qiangtang and Kunlun. These central Tibet terranes continue west into the Karakoram Mountains and Pamir ranges. Metcalf & Kapp (2019)   present results of mapping more than 200 km of the Yarlung Suture zone using detrital zircon U–Pb ages and petrography. Their model has the Zedong arc representing the southward migration of the Gangdese arc as it was emplaced onto a forearc ophiolite complex along the southern margin of Asia. Zhu et al. (2018)   review the magmatism along the Gangdese batholith of south Tibet since 120 Ma using a very large dataset of 290 U–Pb zircon ages that span c. 210 – c. 10 Ma. The majority of the ages are from the main calc-alkaline granite–granodiorite Gangdese rocks, but an important minority are from the small volume felsic adakites that were erupted at c. 16 Ma. The age of the Linzizong calc-alkaline volcanics is now refined to c. 60–52 Ma.

The geology of the Karakoram and Pamir, the eastern extension of the northern Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes, is very different from the geology of central Tibet. Much of the latter is composed of sedimentary rocks and granites with few metamorphic deep crust rocks, whereas large tracts of the southern Karakoram and central Pamirs are dominated by kyanite- and sillimanite-grade regional metamorphic rocks. Searle & Hacker (2018)   review the structure and metamorphic evolution of the Karakoram and Pamir. The ages of peak metamorphism appear close to mirror images of the Oligocene–Miocene ages from the Greater Himalaya, suggesting post-collision crustal thickening spread both south (Himalaya) and north (Karakoram, Pamir) of the suture zone. These Cenozoic metamorphic rocks are not exposed across central or eastern Tibet, but could be present in parts of the deep crust of the plateau region, unexposed thus far by erosion–exhumation processes. He et al. (2018)   integrate new geological mapping along the Muskol metamorphic dome in the Central Pamir with detrital zircon geochronology and petrography. They describe Triassic rocks unconformably overlain by Cretaceous strata that are similar to the southern Qiangtang terrane and Bangong suture zone. Oligocene conglomerates interbedded with siltstones record a juvenile magmatism at c. 32 Ma. Finally, Clift & Webb (2018)   review the history of the Asian monsoon in South Asia. They describe a strengthening of rainfall at c. 24 Ma, with a peak wet period at c. 15 Ma in the middle Miocene and a drying at c. 8 Ma. Neither of these ages correlates with the timing of uplift of the Tibetan plateau, or with the retreat of shallow marine seas from central Asia. The rise of the Himalaya during the Miocene provided an abrupt tectonic barrier to the northerly summer monsoon wind and rainfall, a situation that continues to this day.

Acknowledgments

We would like thank all authors in this volume for their timely papers, and all reviewers who provided valuable and positive feed-back. Bethan Phillips of the Geological Society, London publications provided excellent and very efficient help at all stages of production. We also thank Series Editor Rick Law for his wise council and rapid reviews.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Figures & Tables

Geological map of the Himalaya.

  • Copyright © 2024
  • How to Subscribe
  • Privacy Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Industry
  • For Society Members
  • For Authors
  • Terms & Conditions
  • 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1500
  • McLean, VA 22102
  • Telephone: 1-800-341-1851
  • Copyright © 2024 GeoScienceWorld

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Suggestions or feedback?

MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Machine learning
  • Social justice
  • Black holes
  • Classes and programs

Departments

  • Aeronautics and Astronautics
  • Brain and Cognitive Sciences
  • Architecture
  • Political Science
  • Mechanical Engineering

Centers, Labs, & Programs

  • Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)
  • Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
  • Lincoln Laboratory
  • School of Architecture + Planning
  • School of Engineering
  • School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
  • Sloan School of Management
  • School of Science
  • MIT Schwarzman College of Computing

Study determines the original orientations of rocks drilled on Mars

Press contact :, media download.

Rendering shows the Perseverance on the rocky brown surface of Mars. The Perseverance resembles a go-cart and has 6 wheels and an arm extending that houses the drill. The top of the Perseverance has a long neck and a camera on top.

*Terms of Use:

Images for download on the MIT News office website are made available to non-commercial entities, press and the general public under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license . You may not alter the images provided, other than to crop them to size. A credit line must be used when reproducing images; if one is not provided below, credit the images to "MIT."

Rendering shows the Perseverance on the rocky brown surface of Mars. The Perseverance resembles a go-cart and has 6 wheels and an arm extending that houses the drill. The top of the Perseverance has a long neck and a camera on top.

Previous image Next image

As it trundles around an ancient lakebed on Mars, NASA’s Perseverance rover is assembling a one-of-a-kind rock collection. The car-sized explorer is methodically drilling into the Red Planet’s surface and pulling out cores of bedrock that it’s storing in sturdy titanium tubes. Scientists hope to one day return the tubes to Earth and analyze their contents for traces of embedded microbial life.

Since it touched down on the surface of Mars in 2021, the rover has filled 20 of its 43 tubes with cores of bedrock. Now, MIT geologists have remotely determined a crucial property of the rocks collected to date, which will help scientists answer key questions about the planet’s past.

In a study appearing today in the journal Earth and Space Science , an MIT team reports that they have determined the original orientation of most bedrock samples collected by the rover to date. By using the rover’s own engineering data, such as the positioning of the vehicle and its drill, the scientists could estimate the orientation of each sample of bedrock before it was drilled out from the Martian ground.

The results represent the first time scientists have oriented samples of bedrock on another planet. The team’s method can be applied to future samples that the rover collects as it expands its exploration outside the ancient basin. Piecing together the orientations of multiple rocks at various locations can then give scientists clues to the conditions on Mars in which the rocks originally formed.

“There are so many science questions that rely on being able to know the orientation of the samples we’re bringing back from Mars,” says study author Elias Mansbach, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences.

“The orientation of rocks can tell you something about any magnetic field that may have existed on the planet,” adds Benjamin Weiss, professor of planetary sciences at MIT. “You can also study how water and lava flowed on the planet, the direction of the ancient wind, and tectonic processes, like what was uplifted and what sunk. So it’s a dream to be able to orient bedrock on another planet, because it’s going to open up so many scientific investigations.”

Weiss and Mansbach’s co-authors are Tanja Bosak and Jennifer Fentress at MIT, along with collaborators at multiple institutions including the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Caltech.

Profound shift

The Perseverance rover, nicknamed “Percy,” is exploring the floor of Jezero Crater, a large impact crater layered with igneous rocks, which may have been deposited from past volcanic eruptions, as well as sedimentary rocks that likely formed from long-dried-out rivers that fed into the basin.

Against a dark grid with location points, a mosaic of photos is collaged together showing the rocky surface of mars. Some rocks create strong shadows and have a bluish-grey color, while most of the surface is tan.

“Mars was once warm and wet, and there’s a possibility there was life there at one time,” Weiss says. “It’s now cold and dry, and something profound must have happened on the planet.”

Many scientists, including Weiss, suspect that Mars, like Earth, once harbored a magnetic field that shielded the planet from the sun’s solar wind. Conditions then may have been favorable for water and life, at least for a time.

“Once that magnetic field went away, the sun’s solar wind — this plasma that boils off the sun and moves faster than the speed of sound — just slammed into Mars’ atmosphere and may have removed it over billions of years,” Weiss says. “We want to know what happened, and why.”

The rocks beneath the Martian surface likely hold a record of the planet’s ancient magnetic field. When rocks first form on a planet’s surface, the direction of their magnetic minerals is set by the surrounding magnetic field. The orientation of rocks can thus help to retrace the direction and intensity of the planet’s magnetic field and how it changed over time.

Since the Perseverance rover was collecting samples of bedrock, along with surface soil and air, as part of its exploratory mission, Weiss, who is a member of the rover’s science team, and Mansbach looked for ways to determine the original orientation of the rover’s bedrock samples as a first step toward reconstructing Mars’ magnetic history.

“It was an amazing opportunity, but initially there was no mission requirement to orient bedrock,” Mansbach notes.

Roll with it

Over several months, Mansbach and Weiss met with NASA engineers to hash out a plan for how to estimate the original orientation of each sample of bedrock before it was drilled out of the ground. The problem was a bit like predicting what direction a small circle of sheetcake is pointing, before twisting a round cookie cutter in to pull out a piece. Similarly, to sample bedrock, Perseverance corkscrews a tube-shaped drill into the ground at a perpendicular angle, then pulls the drill directly back out, along with any rock that it penetrates.

To estimate the orientation of the rock before it was drilled out of the ground, the team realized they need to measure three angles, the hade, azimuth, and roll, which are similar to the pitch, yaw, and roll of a boat. The hade is essentially the tilt of the sample, while the azimuth is the absolute direction the sample is pointing relative to true north. The roll refers to how much a sample must turn before returning to its original position.

In talking with engineers at NASA, the MIT geologists found that the three angles they required were related to measurements that the rover takes on its own in the course of its normal operations. They realized that to estimate a sample’s hade and azimuth they could use the rover’s measurements of the drill’s orientation, as they could assume the tilt of the drill is parallel to any sample that it extracts.

To estimate a sample’s roll, the team took advantage of one of the rover’s onboard cameras, which snaps an image of the surface where the drill is about to sample. They reasoned that they could use any distinguishing features on the surface image to determine how much the sample would have to turn in order to return to its original orientation.

In cases where the surface bore no distinguishing features, the team used the rover’s onboard laser to make a mark in the rock, in the shape of the letter “L,” before drilling out a sample — a move that was jokingly referred to at the time as the first graffiti on another planet.

By combining all the rover’s positioning, orienting, and imaging data, the team estimated the original orientations of all 20 of the Martian bedrock samples collected so far, with a precision that is comparable to orienting rocks on Earth.

“We know the orientations to within 2.7 degrees uncertainty, which is better than what we can do with rocks in the Earth,” Mansbach says. “We’re working with engineers now to automate this orienting process so that it can be done with other samples in the future.”

“The next phase will be the most exciting,” Weiss says. “The rover will drive outside the crater to get the oldest known rocks on Mars, and it’s an incredible opportunity to be able to orient these rocks, and hopefully uncover a lot of these ancient processes.”

This research was supported, in part, by NASA and the Mars 2020 Participating Scientist program.

Share this news article on:

Related links.

  • Benjamin Weiss
  • Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences

Related Topics

  • Planetary science
  • Space, astronomy and planetary science
  • Space exploration

Related Articles

Workers in white protective gear stand near the Psyche spacecraft as it sits on a stand at Astrotech Space Operations facility.

With Psyche, a journey to an ancient asteroid is set to begin

The meteorite is dark black and shiny, with a rough texture. A chip of the meteorite is next to it, and a cube says “1 CM” on it.

A message to meteorite hunters: Put down your magnets!

The MOXIE experiment, in a gold-colored housing about a foot cubed, is handled by a person wearing a white clean suit in a clean room

MIT’s MOXIE experiment reliably produces oxygen on Mars

Jezero crater is an ancient Martian lake

Rover images confirm Jezero crater is an ancient Martian lake

Perseverance rover.

With Perseverance, MIT teams prepare for Mars rover landing

Previous item Next item

More MIT News

Multiple robotic arms working in close proximity inside a warehouse setting

Method rapidly verifies that a robot will avoid collisions

Read full story →

Ernest Fraenkel poses for a photo in a wet lab

Deciphering the cellular mechanisms behind ALS

Glassy orange dodecahedrons float in blue space, and each are covered in a few bits of blue and green blobs.

MIT scientists use a new type of nanoparticle to make vaccines more powerful

Glowing human brain illustration with brain waves crossing through center horizontally

A noninvasive treatment for “chemo brain”

Grayscale photo of Anne Serby wearing a lab coat and seated at a lab table using a microscope

New exhibits showcase trailblazing MIT women

Taken slightly from above, photo shows Nicole McGaa sits on a dark chair in an office with shelves filled with papers and books.

Nicole McGaa: Ensuring safe travels in space

  • More news on MIT News homepage →

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA

  • Map (opens in new window)
  • Events (opens in new window)
  • People (opens in new window)
  • Careers (opens in new window)
  • Accessibility
  • Social Media Hub
  • MIT on Facebook
  • MIT on YouTube
  • MIT on Instagram

IMAGES

  1. Abstract

    himalayan geology research paper

  2. Abstract

    himalayan geology research paper

  3. (PDF) Geology of Himachal Pradesh 001

    himalayan geology research paper

  4. Abstract

    himalayan geology research paper

  5. Himalaya (Geological Aspects)

    himalayan geology research paper

  6. (a) Geological map of the NW Himalaya showing the tectonostratigraphic

    himalayan geology research paper

VIDEO

  1. Himalayas' Ancient Rise #geology #himalayas

  2. Himalayan Routes

  3. Journey of a Geologist

  4. GLG102IN Online

  5. formation of Himalayas @geography@bpsc@uppsc

  6. Evolution of the Trans-Himalayan Ladakh-Karakorum magmatic arc

COMMENTS

  1. Himalayan Geology (Journal)

    'Himalayan Geology' is a biannual (January and July) flagship scholarly journal of the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun. It publishes original research contributions on several aspects of geology, geophysics, sedimentology, paleontology, stratigraphy, magmatism, metamorphism, collisional tectonics, seismicity, seismogenesis, geomorphology, geological map, glaciology, hydrology ...

  2. Glacial change and hydrological implications in the Himalaya and

    The 32,637 glaciers in the H-K cover a total area of 41,514 km 2 (ref. 6) and are distributed heterogeneously (Fig. 1).Cold, polythermal and temperate glacier types are all present and exhibit the ...

  3. Introduction to Himalayan tectonics: a modern synthesis

    In many respects this was the golden age of Himalayan research when vast tracts of geologically unknown mountain ranges were mapped and studied for the first time. ... Two complementary papers explore the geology and evolution of the Kohistan arc in the Pakistan Himalaya. ... Along the Himalaya the geology of the currently exposed Indian plate ...

  4. Himalayan Geology

    Join for free and gain visibility by uploading your research. or. Discover by subject area ... Himalayan Geology, 28(1), 1-22 ... The paper presents the details and outcome of the geological and ...

  5. Tectonics of the northern Himalaya since the India-Asia collision

    The STDS is the largest-scale detachment fault system in the world with an extension of over 2000 km along the northern side of the high crest line of Himalayas (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).It juxtaposes the un-metamorphosed (limestone and sandstone) or low-grade (slate and phyllite) rocks in the THS over the high-grade rocks in the GHC (gneiss, granite with some schist), marking one of the critical ...

  6. Tectonics of the northern Himalaya since the India-Asia collision

    Complex orogenic process in northern Himalaya. In this paper, we have presented evidence for two tectonic transforms in the orogenic process of the Himalayas. ... He finished his post-doctoral research in Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS, in 1999. Afterward he moved to Peking University. His primary research interests focus on ...

  7. Welcome to Himalayan Geology

    Welcome to Himalayan Geology Online Submission System. "Himalayan Geology", is a biannual (January and July) flagship scholarly journal of the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun. It publishes original research contributions covering several aspects of geology, geophysics, sedimentology, palaeontology, stratigraphy, magmatism ...

  8. Building the Himalaya from tectonic to earthquake scales

    The 2015 Gorkha earthquake, which is, by far, the best documented earthquake in the Himalaya, caused maximum surface uplift of ~1.5 m, roughly correlating with the slip patch. This is matched by a ...

  9. Geological Evolution of the Himalayan Mountains

    10.2.1 Cenozoic Himalayan Foreland Basin (HFB). The HFB is an elongated asymmetrical basin between the Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT) towards south and the MBT in the north, whose sediment pile extends into the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP), where it overlaps the peripheral bulge of the Indian Craton (Tandon 1991; Singh 1999; Kumar et al. 2009).Many transverse basement ridges dissect the HFB into ...

  10. Geological Evolution of the Tethys Himalaya

    The Tethys Himalaya (TH), also known as "Tibetan Zone", is one of the major tectonic domains within the Himalayan orogen, stretching for approximately 2,000 km from Kashmir and the Zanskar-Spiti synclinorium to South Tibet.

  11. Eroding the Himalaya

    The chapter presents the three families of surface processes responsible for eroding the Himalayan range. These include: Himalayan rivers, the glaciated high range, and critical hillslopes. Denudation processes slowly shape landscapes over millions of years, but this long-term evolution results in many cases from the incremental contribution of ...

  12. Longitudinal profiles and geomorphic indices analysis on tectonic

    1. Introduction. The Himalayas is the most important orogenic belt in the world. The collision of the Eurasian and Indian Plates in the late Pleistocene caused subsidence of the lithosphere and thereby formed the current Himalayan Foreland basin (Burbank & Anderson, Citation 2001; Malik & Nakata, Citation 2003; Nakata, Citation 1989; Singh, Parkash, Mohindra, Thomas, & Singhvi, Citation 2001 ...

  13. PDF Overview of the geology of the Himalayas

    The Himalaya mountain range stretches over 2500km (Le Forte 1975), and its geology directly impacts upon the people who live in the area. This report on Himalayan Geology covers its mode of formation, glaciation and quaternary geology, current tectonics and resources. It will also outline aspects specific

  14. (PDF) Tectonics and Evolution of the Himalaya

    Abstract and Figures. During the period 2011-2015, scientific investigations in the Himalaya incorporated various geological and geophysical aspects of evolution of this mountain, including sub ...

  15. Introduction to Himalayan tectonics: a modern synthesis

    The justification for the current volume in some ways goes back to the success of the 1993 Himalayan Tectonics volume, which provided a remarkably broad ranging set of papers that covered the full range of geography and science that the Himalaya provide us with. These papers have been and continue to be widely cited.

  16. Research Paper Exploring the tectonostratigraphy of the Pakistan

    The western end of the Himalayan orogenic belt contains the Hazara-Kashmir syntaxis (HKS) and the Nanga Parbat syntaxis in northern Pakistan, herein termed the Pakistan Himalaya (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).The along-strike correlation of major Himalayan thrusts, tectonostratigraphic units, and associated tectonic processes from the central Himalaya across NW India and into Pakistan remains enigmatic (e.g ...

  17. (PDF) himalayan geology

    PDF | On Aug 13, 2015, O.P.Thakur and others published himalayan geology | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

  18. Emergence and evolution of Himalaya: reconstructing history in the

    Bartarya, S. K. and Valdiya, K. S. 1989: Landslides and erosion in the catchment of the Gaula River, Kumaun Lesser Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development 9 ... A. C. 1983: The magnetic-polarity stratigraphy of the Siwalik Groups at Haritalyangar, District Bilaspur, H.P. Himalayan Geology 12, 118-144. Google Scholar ... Special Paper 232 ...

  19. [PDF] The Geology of the Himalayas

    THE twenty-third volume of the Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, consisting of some 250 pages, is wholly taken up by an account of the geology of the Central Himalayas, by the Superintendent of the Survey, Mr. C. L. Griesbach, C.I.E. The carefully written text is illustrated by some of the most exquisite and instructive photographs of synclinals, folded beds, faults, glaciers, &c ...

  20. Scientific research in the Himalaya: Current state of knowledge

    Field of biological research represents the oldest discipline (Hooker, 1808) representing 25 % of the published literature followed by geology (Strachey, 1851) with a contribution of 23 % of the literature from the Himalaya. In terms of research funding, all the countries except India and majority of the funding agencies funded highest number ...

  21. Study determines the original orientations of rocks drilled on Mars

    Caption: To sample bedrock, Perseverance corkscrews a tube-shaped drill into the ground at a perpendicular angle, then pulls the drill directly back out, along with any rock that it penetrates. This photo shows the Lefroy Bay core inside the coring bit of the Perseverance rover. Imaged with Mastcam-Z on sol 942.

  22. 200 Years of Research on Himalayan Biodiversity: Trends, Gaps, and

    Indra D. Bhatt. Global mountains, including the Himalaya, are highly vulnerable ecosystems, especially given climate and land-use changes. Here, we compile the literature on Himalayan biodiversity ...

  23. Welcome to Himalayan Geology

    "Himalayan Geology", is a biannual (January and July) flagship scholarly journal of the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun. It publishes original research contributions covering several aspects of geology, geophysics, sedimentology, palaeontology, stratigraphy, magmatism, metamorphism, collisional tectonics, seismicity, seismogenesis, geomorphology, geological map, glaciology ...