HRM practices and innovation: an empirical systematic review

International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government

ISSN : 2516-4392

Article publication date: 22 April 2020

Issue publication date: 28 January 2021

The relationship between human resource management practices (HRMP) and innovation has been described as a black box, where a lot still needs to be investigated. Thus, the aim of this paper is to investigate the nature of the link that exists between HRMP and innovation in both public and private organizations. To do so, theoretical underpinnings and existence of a mediating or a moderating mechanism is inspected.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on an empirical systematic review of research conducted between 2010 and 2018, content analysis has been conducted for 31 peer-reviewed articles in the English language.

Inspecting the nature of relations existed in the chosen articles, interesting findings are addressed relative to the nature of the human resource management systems (HRMS) used, practices encompassed and their different utility. HRMS has been shown to be associated with product innovation yet more evidence is needed for supporting process innovation.

Practical implications

The HRMS/HRMP and innovation relationship is inspected, important practices that would guide managers to induce innovation are highlighted. Usage of multiple HRMS and contingency in constructing such systems is indicated.

Originality/value

Contribution to comprehend the black box and areas for future research has been offered.

  • Systematic review
  • HRM practices
  • HRM systems

Easa, N.F. and Orra, H.E. (2021), "HRM practices and innovation: an empirical systematic review", International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government , Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDIG-11-2019-0005

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Nasser Fathi Easa and Hitham El Orra.

Published in International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government . Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Introduction

Human resource management practices (HRMP) have been gaining an increased attention especially in the fields of economics of the organization, strategic management and human resource management (HRM) ( Laursen and Foss, 2003 ). Moreover, the past two decades were characterized by noticeable progress in researching human resource management systems (HRMS) ( Wei and Lau, 2010 ). HRMS and innovation relationship in firms is growing as many researchers inspected this area (Vogus and Willbourne, 2003; Beugelsdijk, 2008 ; De Winne and Sels, 2010 ; Ma Prieto and Pilar Pérez-Santana, 2014 ; Chen et al. , 2018 ). This growing interest is because of the continuous search for having a competitive advantage in a highly turbulent environment ( Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle, 2008 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ).

Innovation can be promoted through proper management of people ( Shipton et al. , 2005 ). Moreover, firms intending to innovate consider HRMP as a precious resource ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ). Furthermore, human capital when leveraged organizational expertizes are developed, thus innovation would emerge as new products and services ( Chen and Huang, 2009 ). Several ways can be adopted to inspect the HRMP and outcomes linkage. However, the current approach is the following: complementarities or bundle of practices or individual practice in isolation ( Wright and Boswell, 2002 ).

This study seeks to contribute for the comprehension of the HRM and innovation relationship. It has been identified as a black box by several researchers including ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ; Laursen and Foss, 2003 ; Messersmith and Guthrie, 2011). Thus, this study tries to inspect the way by which HRM and innovation are linked. Moreover, if there is a need for a mediating or moderating mechanism to understand such a relation.

In what follows the paper is arranged accordingly, first the methodology of the papers selection is explained. Next, the papers are summarized according to the way that HRMP or human resources systems affect innovation. Then, the existence of mediators and moderators as an explaining mechanism is examined. Eventually, practical implication, directions for future research and conclusion of the study are presented.

Methodology of the review

The 31 studies analyzed were published from January 2003 to December 2018 in 18 Journals ( Table I ). The list is mainly based on high ranking journals with a proven history and impact in the HRM research. The database used includes the following: Academy of Management, Sage Journals, Wiley online library, Taylor and Francis online, science direct, Oxford Academic and Emerald insight.

As a start, the research objective is defined and the conceptual boundaries are set. HRMP and innovation are conceptualized according to the following dimensions: HRMP (bundle/single); characteristics of HRMP; definitions of innovation; dimensions of innovation; the existence of a moderator–mediator; outcomes of HRMP in an indication for innovation in all its forms. Moreover, the focus was on the firm level.

Data collection method

The database on HRMP and innovation in firms was built through specific inclusion criteria. Figure 1 resembles the selection process adopted; as a start, the AJG Academic journal guide for journal ranking was examined to select, which journals to include in the study. Second, the main concentration was on HRM and employment journals. Moreover, the secondary and supportive source of data were, namely, general management, organization studies, innovation, psychology, economics, international business and hospitality. Third, titles, abstracts and keywords are inspected within the selected journals using the following key terms: “HRMP;” innovation and firm.

Studies identified counted 3,118, however, those that were not listed in AJG (2018) academic guide for journal ranking was dropped. Moreover, books, reviews, case studies, introductions, editorials, proceedings and abstracts were also excluded; only empirical articles were taken into consideration. Studies that had zero citations, except those published in 2018 was dropped. Next, all articles published before 2010 and included in the study had at least 60 citations. Also, research papers having the workplace and the organization as their unit of study was dropped, leaving us with 29 articles. However, studies that used companies and firms interchangeably were adopted, which gave us an addition of 2 articles, leaving us with 31 articles.

Human resource management practices and innovation in firm research

The HRMP and innovation relationship in firms is tested in a variety of contexts in this systematic review. This review declares that HRMP and innovation in firms are being empirically explored and has an international appeal as different countries are encompassed.

Distribution of studies

Laursen and Foss (2003) declared that the attention to HRMP and innovation in firms goes back to the late nineties. Their paper is considered to be essential in inspecting the relationship between HRMP and innovation in firms. Thus, the current study took the year 2003 as a starting point to inspect the previously mentioned relationship. The variance of interest in such a relationship is quite noticed since 2010 ( Figure 1 ). The years 2010-2018 accounts for the most empirical output in the field of study ( n = 22). Moreover, the main journals in the study are the following: Human Resource Management (6 articles), The International Journal of Human Resource Management (6 articles), International Journal of Manpower (2 articles), Human Resource Management Journal (2 articles) and Journal of Management (2 articles). Two third of the articles were published in human resource management journals ( n = 20).

Furthermore, the quality of the journals used was distributed accordingly. Approximately 10 per cent of the studies used were published in Grade 4* journals; 41 per cent were published in Grade 4 journals; 31 per cent were published in Grade 3 journals and the remaining 18 per cent were published in Grade 2 journals.

In addition, articles revealed a spread over 15 countries, namely, China and Spain dominated the articles count, eight articles for China and seven for Spain, the USA, the UK and Korea counted for two articles each. The rest of the articles were distributed along 10 countries mainly located in Europe. Thus, suggesting an opportunity for a globalized research, if supported with more samples from different countries. Moreover, what has been noticed supports the claim that China is heading to be the world`s innovator ( Casey and Koleski, 2011 ).

Theoretical perspective

To identify the theories used, Nolan and Garavan (2016) approach is adopted, thus, relying on “what theory is not by” ( Sutton and Staw, 1995 ). Human resources theories were spotted such as, namely, human capital theory is used to explain the relationship between innovations and organizational culture; social context theory to explain the organizational culture and employee behavior relationship ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 ). Moreover, learning theories is noticed, for example: organizational learning theory used to explain the impact of knowledge enhanced on innovation ( Chang et al. , 2013 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ); Upper echelon theory was used to stress the importance of managers’ knowledge in evoking innovation ( De Winne and Sels, 2010 ) ( Figure 2 ).

Furthermore, the resource-based view (RBV) usage is prominent either in isolation or in complementarities. As for the first, RBV has been deployed to explain, namely, the influence of competitive advantage, the support of the knowledge, skill and abilities and intellectual capital on innovation, respectively ( Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle, 2008 ; Lopez‐Cabrales et al. , 2009 ; Donate et al. , 2016 ). While for the later, RBV has been combined with creativity theory as an antecedent for creativity, thus leading to innovation ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ); institutional theory to grab a better understanding of the context as RBV alone fails to do so ( Cooke and Saini, 2010 ); and dynamic capabilities (DC) to enhance innovative performance ( Messersmith and Guthrie, 2010 ).

In addition, the social exchange theory was used in combination with equity theory. Both theories support the claim that employees value the relationship with organization relative to incentives and rewards received ( Jiang et al. , 2012 ). Thus, when employees are valued, they reciprocate the organization with an extra effort and novelty in doing things. Also, the job characteristics theory is used in combination with social cognitive theory to the support the impact of change-oriented HRMS ( Lee et al. , 2016 ). Job characteristics theory increases self-responsibility toward the change and social cognitive theory enhances self-efficacy. Also, organizational support theory was used to explain how managerial support and HRMP would enhance R&D activities, and thus innovation ( Stock et al. , 2014 ). Besides, the presence of knowledge-based view not to be ignored in explaining the importance of knowledge management's impact on innovation ( Andreeva et al. , 2017 ; Chen and Huang, 2009 ).

Finally, the usage of the ability, motivation, opportunity (AMO) framework developed by Bailey (1993) is noticed to be prominent after the year 2014. HRMP are declared to be channeled through, the ability enhancement, motivation and opportunity given for employees (Ma Prieto and Pilar Pérez-Santana, 2014 ; Fu et al. , 2015 ; Lee et al. , 2016 ; Diaz-Fernandez et al. , 2017 ).

Methodology

To analyze the methodology characteristics three aspects have been examined, namely, the industry, the unit of analysis and methods adopted.

The main industry that has been noticed in the chosen articles is the manufacturing sector as it is present in 11 articles. The information and communication technology, is present in 6 papers. The food and beverage, automotive and service industry is present in four research studies. The wholesale trade, computer software industry, electronics, chemical industry, construction and hotel industry was noticed to be covered in 3 articles. The catering, transportation, financial service and textile industry is allocated in two papers. The health and personal service, retail trade, internet and added values services, biotechnology and pharmaceutics and metallurgy industry were inspected in one article each. What is noticed of what been mentioned above that the focus is on the manufacturing industry and there are still some industries to be covered such as oil, education and advertising industries. However, what is interesting that one of the articles excluded the agriculture sector. This may raise some questions and would constitute an opportunity for future research.

Unit of analysis

The individual is the essential unit of investigation of HRMP and innovation in firm research. The human resource director (HRD) was exclusively the unit of analysis in five articles, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in one article and the manager. Top executives including (CEO, general manager) were the unit of analysis in three papers, the CEO and the HRD in two papers, the CEO, production manager and HRD in one paper. Moreover, the CEO, middle-level managers and local stake holders was the unit of analysis in one paper, the CEO, HRD and financial controller in one article. Furthermore, The HRD and owner/manager (entrepreneur), was the unit of analysis in two research studies, the HRD and technology manager in one paper, the HRD, operational manager and employee in one article, the HRD, strategic director, production manager and the employee in one paper. Also, the senior, middle and junior managers were the unit of analysis in one paper, the senior executives in one article and the marketing manager and R&D manager in one research. As noticed, almost all of papers have focused on either top or middle management to represent the firm without giving an attention to the lower level of employees. Thus, supporting the claim that employeès opinion and reaction to HR practices is usually not addressed in HRM literature ( Nolan and Garavan, 2016 ).

Methods used

The empirical systematic literature review revealed some aspects about the methodological trends used. In total, 27 studies used questioners or surveys (interchangeably) for data collection, only two of them were longitudinal, while the rest were cross-sectional. Moreover, two studies used a mixed approach of a questioner and an interview. Furthermore, the rest two articles have adopted an interview approach with a longitudinal nature, thus a total of four articles having a longitudinal approach.

Content analysis

The content analysis of HRMP and innovation in firms focused on the following aspects: HRMP (bundle/single); existence of a moderating or a mediating variable, namely, characteristics of HRMS; definitions of innovation; outcomes of HRMP in an indication for innovation in all its forms.

Human resource management systems or human resource management practices

Lado and Wilson (1994) defined an HRMS as “a set of distinct but interrelated activities, functions and processes that are directed at attracting, developing and maintaining or disposing of a firm’s human resources.” Thus, indicating for the complementary and interrelated nature of the practices formulating an HRMS that imposes a competitive advantage for the firm. Moreover, high-performance work systems (HPWS) in accordance with what have been mentioned earlier is defined as “a system of HRMP designed to enhance employees’ skills, commitment and productivity in such a way that employees become a source of sustainable competitive advantage” ( Pfeffer and Jeffrey, 1998 ).

Moreover, the majority of researchers have adopted HMR practices in isolation to inspect its impact on performance ( Wright and Boswell, 2002 ). However, there is a call for adopting sophisticated HRMS to induce product and technological innovation ( Shipton et al. , 2005 ). HRMP when adopted as a system, is expected to evoke innovation as noticed in many research studies, for example: De Winne and Sels (2010) , Lopez-Cabrales et al. (2009) and many others.

The notion of complementarities is essential for HRMP to induce innovation ( Laursen and Foss, 2003 ). However, it has been found that isolated HRMP induce innovation to a certain extent. However, their interactive impact will be more significant ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ; Shipton et al. , 2006 ). Furthermore, the impact of a single practice of HRM on a firm`s performance is not beneficial ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 ). Additionally, Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle (2005) in their study announced a lack of support for the claim that HRMP in isolation would induce innovation.

Moreover, the aspect of integration and fit is highlighted as; HRM system alone might not induce innovation unless accompanied by an organizational culture that supports innovation. Furthermore, the existence of an innovative strategy accompanied by the HRMP is essential for firm innovation (Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle, 2005). On the other hand, the alignment of HRMP toward the same goal may have a negative effect ( Andreeva et al. , 2017 ).

In summary, papers that used HRMP as a bundle was ( n = 26); in isolation ( n = 4); a mixture of a bundle and isolation ( n = 1). It is noticed that most researchers agree on the notion of the bundle, however, lack of agreement is noticed relative to the type of practices to integrate in the system (Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle, 2005).

Human resource management systems characteristics

A variety of HRMS is used in literature with different HRMP and purposes. HRMS are categorized according to their purpose, namely, innovation-oriented encompassing practices that help build an innovative culture ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 ); a learning supportive ( De Saa-Perez and Díaz-Díaz, 2010 ; Laursen and Foss, 2003 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ; Shipton et al. , 2006 ); an exploration and behavior fit to strategy ( Cooke and Saini, 2010 ); flexibility and adaptive capability-oriented system to face the rapid environmental changes ( Chang et al. , 2013 ; Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle, 2008 ; Martínez-Sánchez et al. , 2011 ; Wei and Lau, 2010 ); a system that allow firms to evoke knowledge and build expertize ( Andreeva et al. , 2017 ; Chen and Huang, 2009 ; De Winne and Sels, 2010 ; Lopez-Cabaralez et al. , 2009; Sung and Choi, 2018 ); high performance work systems used to motivate and build human and social capital ( Fu et al. , 2015 ; Donate et al. , 2016 ; Messersmith and Guthrie, 2010 ); commitment oriented that establish social relations and evokes employee commitment toward the organization and risk taking ( Ceylan, 2013 ; Chen et al. , 2018 ; Neives and Osorio, 2017; Zhou et al. , 2013 ); a collaboration HRMS that helps in the development of equality relationship ( Zhou et al. , 2013 ); high involvement work practices that induce management coworkers support ( Ma Prieto and Pérez-Santana, 2014 ); a change oriented that impact employee psychological status such as self-efficacy and responsibility to change ( Lee et al. , 2016 ); and a creativity inducing system ( Liu et al. , 2017 ).

In summary, HRMS that builds knowledge capabilities evokes flexibility and learning is highly used in research. Moreover, commitment systems are quite noticed, however, the concepts of fit, culture and collaboration need to be more research as few studies have been encountered. Additionally, the same systems encompassing different HRMP were used for different purposes. Furthermore, different systems have been used for the same purpose.

Systems used for different purposes are high performance work system, high commitment human resource system. The first was used to; motivate, build human and social capital ( Messersmith and Guthrie, 2010 ); to enhance adaptive capability ( Wei and Lau, 2010 ); and induce innovative work behavior ( Fu et al. , 2015 ). The latter, was used to support learning ( De Saa-Perez and Díaz-Díaz, 2010 ); enhance innovative capability ( Zhou et al. , 2013 ) and innovative behavior, evoke organizational commitment and employee risk-taking Chen et al. (2018) and alignment of strategy ( Cooke and Saini, 2010 ). This supports the notion that HRMS are used interchangeably especially HPWS, high involvement work system (HIWS) and high commitment work systems (HCWS) ( Chen et al. , 2018 ).

Human resource management practices in isolation

Utilization of HRMP in isolation is quite noticed and adopted in recent research studies. The practices used can be categorized according to their purpose of usage. Lau and Ngo (2004) used three practices directed toward mindfulness; Jiang et al. (2012) adopted eight practices to evoke employee creativity; Stock et al. (2014) used four innovation-oriented practices; and Diaz-Fernandez et al. (2017) incorporated four practices aiming at enhancing employee abilities, motivation and opportunity to innovate.

Innovation by definition

Different definitions of innovation have been encountered, thus a trial has been conducted to set a certain trend for the definitions adopted. The definition by West and Far, used by Jiang et al. (2012) , Shipton et al. (2005) and Shipton et al. (2006) . It captures the deliberate behavior directed toward new (products, ideas and processes), that is new to the adopting unit and beneficial for the organization and society. Moreover, its usage has been noticed to be mainly for the technological products and processes.

Next, the prominent author relied upon in defining innovation was Damanpour, as there has been three definitions established during the following years 1989, 1991 and 1998. The articles are developed by: Diaz-Fernandez et al. (2017) , Ceylan (2013) , Chang et al. (2011) , Chen and Huang (2009) , Fu et al. (2015) , Jemenez-Jemenez and Sanz Valle (2008), Wei and Lau (2010) and Zhou et al. (2013) . Such definitions consider innovation as a performance outcome. Moreover, it captures the innovative strategy, product, project, process and organizational innovation. Furthermore, the measuring scale of patents and the classification of radical and incremental innovation was realized.

Additionally, innovation as newness in products, services, work and practices is addressed relying on ( Rogers, 1983 ). In addition, innovation has been considered to be embedded in knowledge according to kogut and Zander (1992) , Nonaka (1994) and Smith et al. (2005) .

In summary, the definition of innovation adopted is mainly that of Damanpour, which states that, namely, “the adoption of an idea or behavior, whether a system, policy, program, device, process, product or service, that is new to the adopting organization” ( Damanpour et al. , 1989 ).

Mediator or moderator

Almost half the studies ( n = 17) have used a mediator or a moderator as an explaining tool for the indirect linkage between HRMP and innovation in firms ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 also Wei and Lau, 2010 ). The mediators used are as follows: Organizational culture, knowledge management capacity, unique knowledge, valuable knowledge, adaptive capability, innovation-oriented strategy, employee creativity, cross-functional research and development, absorptive capacity, innovative work behavior, human and social capital, firm ownership and middle managers innovative behavior. On the other hand, the moderators incorporated are, namely, environmental dynamism, strategic activities, compensation and benefits, employee creativity, work-family conflict and work climate.

In the following section, the outcomes of the articles included in the review are presented accordingly; and the HRMP and innovation relationship (direct/indirect). Moreover, the direct relationship is categorized into bundles, isolation and utilization of both approaches.

Human resource management systems

First, trying to find the best bundle of practices for product innovation in firms, Laursen and Foss (2003) adopted two systems, namely, the first composed of nine practices and the second composed of two; however, both having a learning objective. Their sample was 913 Danish firms with at least 100 employees. Results indicated that the complementarities effect between practices enhances their impact on innovation, however, only seven of the first system had a positive significant impact. Moreover, Shipton et al. (2005) examined the British context by sampling 32 firms having at least 70 employees. The system adopted is learning-oriented composed of six practices. Results indicated a significant impact on product production and technology innovation, however, no impact on the process. This notion was supported by Jiménez-Jiménez and Sanz-Valle (2008), when exploring the Spanish context, with a sample of 173 firms having more than 50 employees.

Also, De Winne and Sels (2010) , with a sample of 294 startup firms in Belgium inspected the impact of HRMP as a bundle on product, process and service innovation. The systems composed of five practices directed toward knowledge creation and retention. Results indicated high positive significance between the bundle of practices and the mentioned types of innovation. In addition, De Saa-Perez and Díaz-Díaz (2010) , while investigating the Canary Islands by sampling 157 firms having more than 10 employees. High commitment HRMP was used such as internal promotion, group-based performance appraisal among six practices. It was noticed the existence of a positive influence on product and process innovation, yet this influence varies relative to sectors.

Furthermore, Messermith and Gutherie (2010) handled a sample of 2018 firm in the USA having 20 to 100 employees. HPWS was adopted, it supported the emergence of product, organizational but not process innovation. Besides, Zhou et al. (2013) inspected two systems of HRMP, commitment and collaboration in the Chinese context of 125 firms having 50 employees and above. Both systems indicated a positive impact on organizational innovation, however, when implemented together, a negative interactions emerges this hindering innovation. The commitment-based system was used by Ceylan (2013) , which enhanced various forms of innovation This positive impact on innovation is also reflected when studying 109 firms with 50 employees or more in Spain ( Nieves and Osorio, 2017 ).

In summary, different usage of HRMP systems shown a positive association with product innovation, however, little evidence is provided to support the emergence of process innovation. Moreover, innovation level varies among sectors as some are influenced by specific types of system of practices. Thus, according to the sector, careful selection of practices should be adopted. Furthermore, it was noticed that when implementing two different types of systems, the impact of both systems on innovation is diminished. This is explained according to ambidexterity as there should be a balance if more than one system is adopted.

Next, Vogus and Wellborne (2003) examined the USA by a sample of 184 firms having an average of 238 employees. HRMP was used in isolation, results indicated that innovation output is strongly increased by these practices. Moreover, Beugelsdijk (2008) examined the Dutch context with a sample of 988 firms having a minimum of 5 employees. Outcomes highlighted the importance of adopting practices that stress training and incentives to induce incremental innovation such as follows: training, performance-based pay. While, for radical innovation the adopted practices should induce autonomy.

Combination

Then, Shipton et al. (2006) inspected the UK context through 22 firms having an average of 236 employees. They adopted a set of practices that evoke exploratory learning; results indicated that induction, appraisal, training and teamwork had a significant impact on product innovation yet; appraisal had no impact on technical system innovation. Moreover, contingent reward had no impact on both types of innovation, however, when combined with other practices as a system its impact becomes obvious. In addition, the combined influence had a stronger impact on technical innovation.

Moreover, Chang et al. (2011) when adopting selection and training practices in isolation both had a positive impact on incremental and radical innovation. However, the joint adoption had a negative impact on incremental innovation. Thus, a proper identification of practices so that, they won` t impact each other negatively. Besides, Andreeva et al. (2017) adopted 3 knowledge-oriented practices to inspect jointly and separately in 259 companies with at least 100 employees in Finland. The separate impact of rewards and appraisals was positive on incremental innovation, however, no interaction impact. While, for radical innovation rewards had a positive impact while the interactive impact was negative. This supports the notion of careful selection when combing practices.

In summary, various HRMP have been examined if being used would enhance innovation, surprisingly most studies revealed that single practices would evoke innovation. However, when combined with each other innovation will be hindered. Thus, contradicting what has been mentioned above relative to the impact of bundles of HRMP on innovation.

Mediators and moderators

Finally, the existence of a mediating or moderation mechanism to explain the HRMP and innovation linkage is noticed. Lau and Ngo (2004) used innovation-oriented HRMP as a bundle in 332 firms having more than 50 employees in Hong Kong. The system used to create cross-functional teams that support change. It had a positive impact on innovation through the organizational culture. Moreover, knowledge management capacity as a moderator was adopted by Chen and Huang (2009) while examining Taiwanese firms. Results supported the mediating impact between HRMP as a bundle and innovation (administrative and technical). Furthermore, Lopez-Cabrales et al. (2009) examined the Spanish context with a sample of 86 firms having more than 50 employees. Two types of bundles was adopted; knowledge-based and Collaborative HRMP mediated by valuable knowledge and unique knowledge respectively. Hence, both systems had no direct effect, while only collaborative HRMP has an impact on innovation mediated by unique knowledge.

In addition, partial support has been recognized when examining the HPWS and product innovation relationship mediated by adaptive capability ( Wei and Lau, 2010 ). Also, Cooke et al. (2010) inspected the impact of high commitment work practices on product, process and customer service innovation through alignment of strategy. Strong influence has been noticed, which was explained by the adoption of practices supporting each other. Also, Jiang et al. (2012) tested the impact of HRMP in isolation on technological and organizational innovation mediated by employee creativity. All practices indicated a positive mediation, however, training and performance appraisal were not.

Next, cross-functional R&D was inspected as a mediator between HRMP in isolation and product program innovativeness. The test conducted in the German context with a sample of 125 firms having 50 employees and above ( Stock et al. , 2014 ). Training and rewards had a strong influence on product program innovativeness, however, recruitment had no impact. Besides, the mediating role of absorptive capacity between flexibility-oriented HRMS and incremental innovation was inspected in China. Both systems indicated a significant association with firm innovativeness, however, when implemented together the positive impact fades ( Chang et al. , 2013 ).

Then, Ma Prieto and Pilar Pérez-Santana (2014) adopted a supportive work environment as a mediator between high involvement HRMP and innovative work behavior. The study was conducted in Spain handling sample of 198 firms. Outcomes indicated that direct and the mediated relationship between HRMP targeting employee’s abilities, skills and opportunities and innovative work behavior is significant. As well, Fu et al. (2015) when examining the Irish context adopted HWPS and organizational innovation relationship mediated by innovative work behavior. The sample included 120 firms and results supported the direct and the mediated relationship.

Subsequently, Donate et al. (2016) sampled 72 firms in Spain, where two systems are adopted. High profile performance systems composed of five practices and a collaborative system composed of seven practices. The relation with product and process innovation was examined through human and social capital. Results indicated that both systems positively impacted product and process innovation when mediated through human and social capital respectively. In addition, Lee et al. (2016) investigated the Korean context sampling 11 firms while adopting a change-oriented HRM system. The suggested relationship between HRM system and group innovation is through employee proactively. Primary results indicated a channeling effect of employee proactive behavior, however, no mediating effect.

As for the moderated relationship between HRMP and innovation, environmental dynamism was used by Martínez-Sánchez et al. (2011) in the Spanish context. The study encompassed two flexibility-oriented systems; internal and external numerical. Moreover, the internal system is composed by its turn from functional and numerical. Results indicated that for both direct and moderated relationship the following. The internal system with both its subsystems indicated a positive relationship with innovativeness, however, only consulting contracting firms in the external system is in positive relation.

Furthermore, Diaz-Fernandez et al. (2017) conducted a longitudinal study in the Spanish context encompassing a sample of 1,363 firms. He used four HRMP in isolation to be moderated by compensation and benefits. Results indicated that only employment security and investment in new training technologies had a significant impact on innovation as long as this relationship is moderated by high salaries. However, employment security, compensation when implemented in isolation had no impact on innovation. Moreover, the language training and training in new technologies had not impact.

Additionally, what is interesting is the existence of a mediator and a moderator in three studies encompassed in the review. First, Liu et al. (2017) investigated the Chinese context by sampling 57 firms. Two systems are adopted, the employee experienced performance HRM and employee experienced maintenance-oriented HRM. The two systems implemented with employee creativity as moderator and firm ownership as a mediator. The multilevel relationship indicated a positive impact on firm innovation. Next, Sung and Choi (2018) examined the Korean contest with a two-set of knowledge stock and flow-oriented practices. The mediators used firm knowledge flow and stock, while the moderator is the strategy. Flow and stock facilitating HRMP indicated a positive impact on firm innovation through firm knowledge flow. Moreover, the moderating effect is partial as innovation is impacted through knowledge stock. Thus there is a need for a proper implementation of high levels of firm knowledge flow if to make use of firm knowledge stock in inducing innovation.

Finally, Chen et al. (2018) inspected 113 firms in the Chinese context where a high commitment work system is used. The system impact on innovative behavior is studied through middle managers innovative behavior; this relation is moderated by work-family conflict and work climate. The managers’ innovative behavior successfully mediates the relationship between HCWS and firm innovative performance. However, the direct relationship was not significant, moreover work-family conflict had a negative impact on innovative behavior. Furthermore, the combined effect of HCWS with both moderating variables indicated a positive impact on innovative behavior.

In summary, the research is rich with trials to explain the relationship between HRMP and innovation through a mechanism. However, the mediating mechanism is more popular among research, thus, what would be beneficial is search for further moderators to explain the above-mentioned relationship. In what follows managerial implications for practice are presented.

Important practical implications are uncovered for managers that need to acquire human resources skills and competencies, which would enhance the firm`s survival rate. First, it has been noticed that the existence of training in most of the HRMS is present and plays a vital role in inducing innovation. Lack of training might be reflected in the absence of innovation, however, presence of training would prevent employees from being square minded. Thus, managers are required to focus on human capital development and adopt practices that foster knowledge and enrich employees` skills. Fostering knowledge includes the process of acquiring and sharing information among employees. Sharing information can be motivated through a bonus system that reward combined effort rather than individual ones. Moreover, managers can promote a learning environment by having the proper infrastructure needed and through nurturing social ties. On the other hand, it was noticed that training had no impact on innovation; this case needs to be investigated closely.

Second, managers have to be aware to what practices to use in the HRMS, as some practices when combined together would negatively impact the learning process in the organization. Just as the presence of individual appraisal and pay for performance. Such a case will result in conflict, which can be resolved by careful selection and proper fit among HRMP to be included in the system. Moreover, the fit is not restricted to the practices only, as the fit should take into consideration the company strategy. Third, managers who provide a secure working environment for their employees as replacing contracts with full-time schedules, tolerate and encourage risk-taking, will lead provoke innovation. Forth, cultural aspects should be treated carefully, as when ignored will have negative impact on innovation, as cultural changes require the adjustment of management approach.

Fifth, the importance of selecting and hiring employees with unique knowledge and high education and take the proper measures to retain talents and key persons that are considered vital. This can be done through career development, promotions, flexibility, autonomy, motivation and investment in leadership practices in a dynamic environment. Finally, managers would implement more than one HRM system, however, these systems should be implemented in synergy.

Future research

As noticed in the review the theoretical underpinning of the HRMP, innovation relationship is quite noticed. However, there is still a space to examine more theories to explain this relationship, for example. Trait theory can be adopted as it explains the individual-level factors, which might impact HRMS positively or negatively ( Tett and Burnett, 2003 ).

Moreover, regarding the methodology, sampling size in most studies was limited, thus, it would be beneficial to in large it. Furthermore, the impact of the context in which the practices were implemented should have been closely inspected ( Vogus and Welbourne, 2003 ). In addition, the sector was controlled for; however, it would of interest to inspect the type of practices that would impact each sector. Also, the longitudinal approach is scarce as noticed only four articles adopted it ( Diaz-Fernandez et al. , 2017 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ; Shipton et al. , 2006 ; Sung and Choi, 2018 ). Hence, longitudinal studies could grab the impact of the HRMP on innovation in different time intervals. Moreover, the field lacks studies that examined the sample of investigation before and after implementing the HRMP. Finally, face to face interviews when conducted would yield more in-depth information about the field of study.

Furthermore, tow contradicting perspectives have been encountered regarding the parsimony of practices. As for the first, a call is noticed for a limited number of practices, thus inducing flexibility (Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle, 2005). While, the latter the inclusion of enormous sets of practices is noticed ( Donate et al. , 2016 ; Martínez-Sánchez et al. , 2011 ; Zhou et al. , 2013 ). Moreover, substitution of practices or using alternative practices would be an area of interest to be inspected. Additionally, agreement on the type of practices that are aligned and fit is missing. Finally, the inclusion of more variables to portray the linkage between HRMP and innovation is appealing such as organizational structure, psychological contract and organizational capital.

The 31 empirical articles reviewed suggest some improvement toward understanding the HRMP and innovation relationship in firms. The context diversity in which the studies have been conducted reveals that the HRMP and innovation relationship is a rich field yet a lot to be discovered. Practical implication are indicated, which would act as guidance for what of practices would induce innovation if implemented. However, as noticed there no specific system to apply as firms and cultural has to be dealt with according to contingency. Moreover, it suggests some additional theories to be used for inspecting the HRMP and innovation relationship.

In addition, the study encompasses areas of strength and weaknesses, as for the first the types of journals selected are high ranking, which reflects reliability of review. While the latter, the study included only empirical articles, which can be considered a weakness, as many conceptual articles was dropped. Moreover, the studies interpreted the HRMP as a bundle in different ways, with different inclusion of practices for the same system. Furthermore, all unpublished studies, Grade 1 journals, books and abstracts were excluded.

human resource theory research paper

Chart of articles selection method

human resource theory research paper

Distribution of empirical HRMP and innovation publications

List of journals and ranking

Summary of HRMP and innovation publications

*The presence of a Moderator; **the presence of Mediator

Andreeva , T. , Vanhala , M. , Sergeeva , A. , Ritala , P. and Kianto , A. ( 2017 ), “ When the fit between HR practices backfires: exploring the interaction effects between rewards for and appraisal of knowledge behaviours on innovation ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 27 No. 2 , pp. 209 - 227 .

Bailey , T. ( 1993 ), “ Organizational innovation in the apparel industry ”, Industrial Relations , Vol. 32 No. 2 , pp. 30 - 48 .

Beugelsdijk , S. ( 2008 ), “ Strategic human resource practices and product innovation ”, Organization Studies , Vol. 29 No. 6 , pp. 821 - 847 .

Casey , J. and Koleski , K. ( 2011 ), Backgrounder: China’s 12th Five-Year Plan , US-China Economic and Security Review Commission .

Ceylan , C. ( 2013 ), “ Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 24 No. 1 , pp. 208 - 226 .

Chang , S. , Gong , Y. and Shum , C. ( 2011 ), “ Promoting innovation in hospitality companies through human resource management practices ”, International Journal of Hospitality Management , Vol. 30 No. 4 , pp. 812 - 818 .

Chang , S. , Gong , Y. , Way , S.A. and Jia , L. ( 2013 ), “ Flexibility-oriented HRM systems, absorptive capacity, and market responsiveness and firm innovativeness ”, Journal of Management , Vol. 39 No. 7 , pp. 1924 - 1951 .

Chen , C.J. and Huang , J.W. ( 2009 ), “ Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance – the mediating role of knowledge management capacity ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 62 No. 1 , pp. 104 - 114 .

Chen , Y. , Jiang , Y.J. , Tang , G. and Cooke , F.L. ( 2018 ), “ High‐commitment work systems and Middle managers’ innovative behavior in the Chinese context: the moderating role of work‐life conflicts and work climate ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 57 No. 5 , pp. 1317 - 1334 .

Cooke , F.L. and Saini , D.S. ( 2010 ), “ (how) does the HR strategy support an innovation oriented business strategy? an investigation of institutional context and organizational practices in Indian firms ”, Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, the University of MI and in Alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management , Vol. 49 No. 3 , pp. 377 - 400 .

Damanpour , F. , Szabat , K.A. and Evan , W.M. ( 1989 ), “ The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 26 No. 6 , pp. 587 - 602 .

De Winne , S. and Sels , L. ( 2010 ), “ Interrelationships between human capital, HRM and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 21 No. 11 , pp. 1863 - 1883 .

Diaz-Fernandez , M. , Bornay-Barrachina , M. and Lopez-Cabrales , A. ( 2017 ), “ HRM practices and innovation performance: a panel-data approach ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 38 No. 3 , pp. 354 - 372 .

De Saa-Perez , P. and Díaz-Díaz , N.L. ( 2010 ), “ Human resource management and innovation in the canary islands: an ultra-peripheral region of the European Union ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 21 No. 10 , pp. 1649 - 1666 .

Donate , M.J. , Peña , I. and Sanchez de Pablo , J.D. ( 2016 ), “ HRM practices for human and social capital development: effects on innovation capabilities ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 27 No. 9 , pp. 928 - 953 .

Fu , N. , Flood , P.C. , Bosak , J. , Morris , T. and O’Regan , P. ( 2015 ), “ How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms? ”, Employee Relations , Vol. 37 No. 2 , pp. 209 - 231 .

Jiang , J. , Wang , S. and Zhao , S. ( 2012 ), “ Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 23 No. 19 , pp. 4025 - 4047 .

Jimenez-Jimenez , D. and Sanz-Valle , R. ( 2005 ), “ Innovation and human resource management fit: an empirical study ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 26 No. 4 , pp. 364 - 381 .

Jimenez-Jimenez , D. and Sanz-Valle , R. ( 2008 ), “ Could HRM support organizational innovation? ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 19 No. 7 , pp. 1208 - 1221 .

Kogut , B. and Zander , U. ( 1992 ), “ Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology ”, Organization Science , Vol. 3 No. 3 , pp. 383 - 397 .

Lau , C.M. and Ngo , H.Y. ( 2004 ), “ The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation ”, International Business Review , Vol. 13 No. 6 , pp. 685 - 703 .

Lado , A.A. and Wilson , M.C. ( 1994 ), “ Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective ”, The Academy of Management Review , Vol. 19 No. 4 , pp. 699 - 727 .

Laursen , K. and Foss , N.J. ( 2003 ), “ New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance ”, Cambridge Journal of Economics , Vol. 27 No. 2 , pp. 243 - 263 .

Lee , H.W. , Pak , J. , Kim , S. and Li , L.Z. ( 2016 ), “ Effects of human resource management systems on employee proactivity and group innovation ”, Journal of Management , p. 149206316680029 .

Liu , D. , Gong , Y. , Zhou , J. and Huang , J.C. ( 2017 ), “ Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: the moderating role of firm ownership ”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 60 No. 3 , pp. 1164 - 1188 .

Lopez‐Cabrales , A. , Pérez‐Luño , A. and Cabrera , R.V. ( 2009 ), “ Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 48 No. 4 , pp. 485 - 503 .

Ma Prieto , I. and Pérez-Santana , M.P. ( 2014 ), “ Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices ”, Personnel Review , Vol. 43 No. 2 , pp. 184 - 208 .

Martínez-Sánchez , A. , Vela-Jiménez , M.J. , Pérez-Pérez , M. and de-Luis-Carnicer , P. ( 2011 ), “ The dynamics of labour flexibility: relationships between employment type and innovativeness ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 48 No. 4 , pp. 715 - 736 .

Messersmith , J.G. and Guthrie , J.P. ( 2010 ), “ High performance work systems in emergent organizations: implications for firm performance ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 49 No. 2 , pp. 241 - 264 .

Nieves , J. and Osorio , J. ( 2017 ), “ Commitment-based HR systems and organizational outcomes in services ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 38 No. 3 , pp. 432 - 448 .

Nolan , C.T. and Garavan , T.N. ( 2016 ), “ Human resource development in SMEs: a systematic review of the literature ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 18 No. 1 , pp. 85 - 107 .

Nonaka , I. ( 1994 ), “ A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation ”, Organization Science , Vol. 5 No. 1 , pp. 14 - 37 .

OECD/Eurostat ( 2005 ), “ Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data ”, available at: www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/oslomanual_9789264013100-en (accessed 8 August 2015 ).

Pfeffer , J. and Jeffrey , P. ( 1998 ), The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First , Harvard Business Press .

Rogers , M.E. ( 1983 ), Diffusion of Innovations , The Free Press .

Shipton , H. , Fay , D. , West , M. , Patterson , M. and Birdi , K. ( 2005 ), “ Managing people to promote innovation ”, Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol. 14 No. 2 , pp. 118 - 128 .

Shipton , H. , West , M.A. , Dawson , J. , Birdi , K. and Patterson , M. ( 2006 ), “ HRM as a predictor of innovation ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 16 No. 1 , pp. 3 - 27 .

Smith , K.G. , Collins , C.J. and Clark , K.D. ( 2005 ), “ Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms ”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 48 No. 2 , pp. 346 - 357 .

Stock , R.M. , Totzauer , F. and Zacharias , N.A. ( 2014 ), “ A closer look at cross‐functional R&D cooperation for innovativeness: innovation‐oriented leadership and human resource practices as driving forces ”, Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol. 31 No. 5 , pp. 924 - 938 .

Sutton , R.I. and Staw , B.M. ( 1995 ), “ What theory is not ”, Administrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 40 No. 3 , pp. 371 - 384 .

Sung , S.Y. and Choi , J.N. ( 2018 ), “ Building knowledge stock and facilitating knowledge flow through human resource management practices toward firm innovation ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 57 No. 6 , pp. 1429 - 1442 .

Tett , R.P. and Burnett , D.D. ( 2003 ), “ A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance ”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 88 No. 3 , p. 500 .

Vogus , T.J. and Welbourne , T.M. ( 2003 ), “ Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability‐seeking organizations ”, Journal of Organizational Behavior , Vol. 24 No. 7 , pp. 877 - 903 .

Wright , P.M. and Boswell , W.R. ( 2002 ), “ Desegregating HRM: a review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research ”, Journal of Management , Vol. 28 No. 3 , pp. 247 - 276 .

Zhou , Y. , Hong , Y. and Liu , J. ( 2013 ), “ Internal commitment or external collaboration? The impact of human resource management systems on firm innovation and performance ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 52 No. 2 , pp. 263 - 288 .

Further reading

Cano , C.P. and Cano , P.Q. ( 2006 ), “ Human resources management and its impact on innovation performance in companies ”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol. 35 Nos 1-4 , pp. 11 - 28 .

Chowhan , J. ( 2016 ), “ Unpacking the black box: understanding the relationship between strategy, HRM practices, innovation and organizational performance ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 26 No. 2 , pp. 112 - 133 .

Curado , C. ( 2018 ), “ Human resource management contribution to innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: a mixed methods approach ”, Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol. 27 No. 1 , pp. 79 - 90 .

Gong , Y. , Law , K.S. , Chang , S. and Xin , K.R. ( 2009 ), “ Human resources management and firm performance: the differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment ”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 94 No. 1 , p. 263 .

Li , Y. , Wang , M. , Van Jaarsveld , D.D. , Lee , G.K. and Ma , D.G. ( 2018 ), “ From employee-experienced high-involvement work system to innovation: an emergence-based human resource management framework ”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 61 No. 5 , pp. 2000 - 2019 .

Lin , C.H. and Sanders , K. ( 2017 ), “ HRM and innovation: a multi‐level organizational learning perspective ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 27 No. 2 , pp. 300 - 317 .

Wei , L.Q. and Lau , C.M. ( 2010 ), “ High performance work systems and performance: the role of adaptive capability ”, Human Relations , Vol. 63 No. 10 , pp. 1487 - 1511 .

Xiao , Z. and Björkman , I. ( 2006 ), “ High commitment work systems in Chinese organizations: a preliminary measure ”, Management and Organization Review , Vol. 2 No. 3 , pp. 403 - 422 .

Corresponding author

Related articles, we’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap

  • Review Paper
  • Published: 15 June 2020
  • Volume 15 , pages 1465–1515, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

  • Jesús de Frutos-Belizón   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-6910 1 ,
  • Fernando Martín-Alcázar 1 &
  • Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey 1  

1553 Accesses

9 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

In recent studies, researchers agree that there is a substantial gap between research and practice in the field of human resource management (HRM). The literature exploring the causes and consequences of this gap does not represent a finely structured discourse; it has focused on analysing the gap from the practitioner side, and it is based on opinions and theoretical discussions rather than on empirical evidence. In this paper, we try to shed some light on this so-called “valley of death”. We attempt to identify the causes underlying the disconnect between academics and professionals in our field by drawing on empirical qualitative evidence obtained from interviews with 15 expert academics in the field of HRM. Thus, the approach presented in our work differs from that of the prior literature in that it is focused not on the opinions of individual authors but on the personal experiences of a larger expert sample composed of independent, experienced scholars in the area. Based on in-depth semi-structured interviews, we analyse the factors explaining why academics are not always willing to focus their research on professional needs or orientate their research outputs to the practitioner community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

human resource theory research paper

Relating to the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion.

Abrahamson E (2009) Necessary conditions for the study of fads and fashions in science. Scand J Manag 25(2):235–239

Article   Google Scholar  

Agarwal R, Hoetker G (2007) A Faustian bargain? The growth of management and its relationship with related disciplines. Acad Manag J 50(6):1304–1322

Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

Antonakis J (2017) On doing better science: from thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadersh Quart 28(1):5–21

Armstrong M (2006) A handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers, London

Google Scholar  

Artés J, Pedraja-Chaparro F, del Mar Salinas-JiméneZ M (2017) Research performance and teaching quality in the Spanish higher education system: evidence from a medium-sized university. Res Policy 46(1):19–29

Bahuguna PC, Kumari P, Srivastava SK (2009) Changing face of human resource management: a strategic partner in business. Manag Labour Stud 34(4):563–581

Banks GC, Pollack JM, Bochantin JE, Kirkman BL, Whelpley CE, O’Boyle EH (2016) Management’s science–practice gap: a grand challenge for all stakeholders. Acad Manag J 59(6):2205–2231

Bansal P, Bertels S, Ewart T, MacConnachie P, O’Brien J (2012) Bridging the research–practice gap. Acad Manag Perspect 26(1):73–92

Barley SR (2016) 60th anniversary essay: ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out. Adm Sci Q 61(1):1–8

Barnacle R, Dall’Alba G (2014) Beyond skills: embodying writerly practices through the doctorate. Stud High Educ 39(7):1139–1149

Barney JB, Wright PM (1998) On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Hum Resour Manag 37(1):31–46

Bartunek JM (2011) What has happened to mode 2? Br J Manag 22(3):555–558

Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2010) The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: what’s in them and what might they offer? Acad Manag Learn Educ 9(1):100–117

Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2014) Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: the paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. J Manag 40(5):1181–1201

Baum JA (2011) Free-riding on power laws: questioning the validity of the impact factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization 18(4):449–466

Bendig AW (1954) Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories. J Appl Psychol 38(1):38–40

Beyer JM, Trice HM (1982) The utilization process: a conceptual frame work and synthesis of empirical findings. Adm Sci Q 27(4):591–622

Bhatti MW, Ahsan A (2016) Global software development: an exploratory study of challenges of globalization, HRM practices and process improvement. RMS 10(4):649–682

Bryman A (1988) Doing research in organizations. Routledge, London

Bullinger B, Kieser A, Schiller-Merkens S (2015) Coping with institutional complexity: responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies. Scand J Manag 31(3):437–450

Butler L (2003) Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Res Policy 32(1):143–155

Butler D (2008) Crossing the valley of death. Nature 453(7197):840–842

Campbell JP, Dunnette MD (1968) Effectiveness of T-group experiences in managerial training and development. Psychol Bull 70(2):73–104

Carless SA, Rasiah J, Irmer BE (2009) Discrepancy between human resource research and practice: comparison of industrial/organisational psychologists and human resource practitioners’ beliefs. Aust Psychol 44(2):105–111

Chubb J, Reed MS (2018) The politics of research impact: academic perceptions of the implications for research funding, motivation and quality. Br Politics 13(3):295–311

Cohen DJ (2007) The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management: reasons for the divide and concrete solutions for bridging the gap. Acad Manag J 50(5):1013–1019

Collins K, Shiffman D, Rock J (2016) How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS One 11(10):e0162680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162680

Community for Responsible Research in Business and Management (2016). A vision of responsible research in business and management: striving for credible and useful knowledge. Draft for targeted consultation, 30 November 2016

Davis GF (2015) Editorial essay: what is organizational research for? Adm Sci Q 60(2):179–188

De Jong SP, Muhonen R (2020) Who benefits from ex ante societal impact evaluation in the European funding arena? A cross-country comparison of societal impact capacity in the social sciences and humanities. Res Eval 29(1):22–33

Deadrick DL, Gibson PA (2007) An examination of the research–practice gap in HR: comparing topics of interest to HR academics and HR professionals. Hum Resour Manag Rev 17(2):131–139

Deadrick DL, Gibson PA (2009) Revisiting the research–practice gap in HR: a longitudinal analysis. Hum Resour Manag Rev 19(2):144–153

DORA Declaration (2012) The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. http://www.ascb.org/dora/

DeNisi AS, Wilson MS, Biteman J (2014) Research and practice in HRM: a historical perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24(3):219–231

Dunbar RLM, Bresser RF (2014) Knowledge generation and governance in management research. J Bus Econ 84(1):129–144

Durette B, Fournier M, Lafon M (2016) The core competencies of PhDs. Stud High Educ 41(8):1355–1370

Eden C, Huxham C (1996) Action research for management research. Br J Manag 7(1):75–86

Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. Am J Sociol 113(1):1–40

Festinger L (1962) Cognitive dissonance. Sci Am 207(4):93–106

Flickinger M, Tuschke A, Gruber-Muecke T, Fiedler M (2014) In search of rigor, relevance and legitimacy: what drives the impact of publications? J Bus Econ 84:99–128

Fochler M, Felt U, Müller R (2016) Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives. Minerva 54(2):175–200

Gill C (2018) Don’t know, don’t care: an exploration of evidence-based knowledge and practice in human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev 28(2):103–115

Goldfarb B, King AA (2016) Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: significance tests and mistaken inference. Strateg Manag J 37(1):167–176

Gordon RA, Howell JE (1959) Higher education for business. J Bus Educ 35(3):115–117

Guion RM (1965) Personnel testing. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York

Gulati R (2007) Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: the rigor–relevance debate in management research. Acad Manag J 50(4):775–782

Hammarfelt B (2017) Recognition and reward in the academy: valuing publication oeuvres in biomedicine, economics and history. Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):607–623

Hammarfelt B, De Rijcke S (2015) Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University. Res Eval 24(1):63–77

Hangel N, Schmidt-Pfister D (2017) Why do you publish? On the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure. Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):529–544

Hayes RH, Abernathy WJ (1980) Management minus invention (D2). The New York Times, NewYork

Hemlin S, Rasmussen SB (2006) The shift in academic quality control. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(2):173–198

Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, De Rijcke S, Rafols I (2015) The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520(7548):429

Hodgkinson GP, Starkey K (2011) Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again: reframing relevance. Br J Manag 22(3):355–369

Hollingshead AB (1938) Ingroup membership and academic selection. Am Sociol Rev 3(6):826–833

Huff AS, Huff JO (2001) Re-focusing the business school agenda. Br J Manag 12(s1):S49–S54

Ibrahim AM, Lillemoe KD, Klingensmith ME, Dimick JB (2017) Visual abstracts to disseminate research on social media: a prospective, case–control crossover study. Ann Surg 266(6):e46–e48

Jiang K, Lepak DP, Hu J, Baer JC (2012) How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Acad Manag J 55(6):1264–1294

Kelemen M, Bansal P (2002) The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. Br J Manag 13(2):97–108

Khurana R (2007) From higher aims to hired hands: the social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Book   Google Scholar  

Kieser A, Leiner L (2009) Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. J Manag Stud 46(3):516–533

Kieser A, Leiner L (2012) Collaborate with practitioners: but beware of collaborative research. J Manag Inq 21:14–28

Kieser A, Nicolai A, Seidl D (2015) The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. Acad Manag Ann 9(1):143–233

Kvale S (2007) Doing interviews. Sage Publications, London

Langbert M (2005) The master’s degree in HRM: midwife to a new profession? Acad Manag Learn Educ 4(4):434–450

Lange T (2013). Evidence-based HRM: a scholarship perspective with a difference. In: Evidence-based HRM: a global forum for empirical scholarship, vol 1, No 1. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 4–15

Larivière V, Gingras Y (2010) The impact factor’s Matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 61(2):424–427

Lawler EE (2007) Why HR practices are not evidence-based. Acad Manag J 50(5):1033–1036

Lebel J, McLean R (2018) A better measure of research from the global south. Nature 559(7712):23

Lengnick-Hall ML, Lengnick-Hall CA, Andrade LS, Drake B (2009) Strategic human resource management: the evolution of the field. Hum Resour Manag Rev 19(2):64–85

Lewin AY, Chiu CY, Fey CF, Levine SS, McDermott G, Murmann JP, Tsang E (2016) The critique of empirical social science: new policies at management and organization review. Manag Organ Rev 12(4):649–658

Locke E (2011) Handbook of principles of organizational behavior: indispensable knowledge for evidence-based management. Wiley, New York

Markoulli MP, Lee CI, Byington E, Felps WA (2017) Mapping human resource management: reviewing the field and charting future directions. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(3):367–396

Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrial organization. McMillan, New York

Mcculloch S (2017) Hobson’s choice: the effects of research evaluation on academics’ writing practices in England. Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):503–515

Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. Am Sociol Rev 22(6):635–659

Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63

Merton RK (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Miles RE, Snow CC (1984) Designing strategic human resources systems. Org Dyn 13(1):36–52

Mulligan A, Mabe M (2011) The effect of the internet on researcher motivations, behaviour and attitudes. J Document 67(2):290–311

Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (1999) Knowing “what” to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action. Calif Manag Rev 42(1):83–108

Pieper R (1990) Human resource management: an international comparison. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

Pierson FC (1959) The education of American businessmen: a study of university college programs in business administration. McGraw-Hill, New York

Pindur W, Rogers SE, Suk Kim P (1995) The history of management: a global perspective. J Manag Hist 1(1):59–77

Quan W, Chen B, Shu F (2017) Publish or impoverish: an investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):486–502

Rau H, Goggins G, Fahy F (2018) From invisibility to impact: recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research. Res Policy 47(1):266–276

Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1943) Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Rousseau DM, Manning J, Denyer D (2008) Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Acad Manag Ann 2(1):475–515

Rybnicek R, Bergner S, Gutschelhofer A (2019) How individual needs influence motivation effects: a neuroscientific study on McClelland’s need theory. RMS 13(2):443–482

Rynes SL, Colbert AE, Brown KG (2002) HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: correspondence between research and practice. Hum Resour Manag 41(2):149–174

Rynes SL, Giluk TL, Brown KG (2007) The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: implications for evidence-based management. Acad Manag J 50(5):987–1008

Sanders K, van Riemsdijk M, Groen B (2008) The gap between research and practice: a replication study on the HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices. Int J Hum Resour Manag 19(10):1976–1988

Seeber M, Cattaneo M, Meoli M, Malighetti P (2019) Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Res Policy 48(2):478–491  

Shani AB, Coghlan D (2014) Collaborate with practitioners: an alternative perspective a rejoinder to Kieser and Leiner (2012). J Manag Inq 23(4):433–437

Shapiro DL, Kirkman BL, Courtney HG (2007) Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Acad Manag J 50(2):249–266

Shibayama S, Baba Y (2015) Impact-oriented science policies and scientific publication practices: the case of life sciences in Japan. Res Policy 44(4):936–950

Sousa CAA, Hendriks PHJ (2008) Connecting knowledge to management: the case of academic research. Organization 15(6):811–830

Strauss AL, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Taylor FW (1911) The principles of management. Harper, New York

Taylor EK, Wherry RJ (1951) A study of leniency in two rating systems. Pers Psychol 4(1):39–47

Tenhiälä A, Giluk TL, Kepes S, Simón C, Oh IS, Kim S (2016) The research–practice gap in human resource management: a cross-cultural study. Hum Resour Manag 55(2):179–200

Tijdink JK, Schipper K, Bouter LM, Pont PM, De Jonge J, Smulders YM (2016) How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers. BMJ Open 6(2):e008681

Tsui A (2016) Reflections on the so-called value-free ideal: a call for responsible science in the business schools. Cross Cult Strateg Manag 23(1):4–28

Van de Ven AH, Johnson PE (2006) Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):802–821

Vosburgh RM (in press) Closing the academic-practitioner gap: Research must answer the “SO WHAT” question. Hum Resour Manag Rev

Wang J, Peters HP, Guan J (2006) Factors influencing knowledge productivity in German research groups: lessons for developing countries. J Knowl Manag 10(4):113–126

Watermeyer R, Chubb J (2019) Evaluating ‘impact’in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF): liminality, looseness and new modalities of scholarly distinction. Stud High Educ 44(9):1554–1566

Wierzbicki AP, Nakamori Y (2006) Creative space. Springer, Berlin

Wonderlic EF, Hovland CI (1939) The personnel test: a restandardized abridgment of the Otis SA test for business and industrial use. J Appl Psychol 23(6):685–702

Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA (2019) Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566(7744):378–382

Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039

Zizzo DJ (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp Econ 13(1):75–98

Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study has benefited from financing from the Research Project ECO2014-56580-R of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitively, and the Research Projects P12-SEJ-1810 from the Andalusia Government (Spain) and PR2016-018 (Research Projects University of Cadiz).

Author information

The authors appear in alphabetical order and have contributed equitably to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Business Management, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain

Jesús de Frutos-Belizón, Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús de Frutos-Belizón .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

  • Notes: The academics interviewed appear in alphabetical order. This order is not related to the number assigned to each academic interviewed. All information about the interviewees was obtained through Elsevier’s Scopus database and public information in their CVs
  • *The Centre for Performance-led HR (CPHR) at Lancaster has been successful at bringing together world–class academic experts to work with top HR directors to overcome the most pressing issues facing senior HR specialists. It is a unique partnership between Lancaster University Management School and major corporations and was nominated as one of five Outstanding Employer Engagement Initiatives in the 2009 Times Higher Education Awards
  • **NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centres (PSTRCs) work to pull advances in basic research with potential relevance to patient safety into an applied research setting
  • ***The LINK Research Institute, based at Dublin City University Business School, sets out to understand the factors that contribute to successful organisations, both private and public, in Ireland and internationally. The LINK Research Institute enjoys mutually beneficial collaborations with a wide range of organisations. This includes various consulting projects with a wide range of organisations such as: Fáilte Ireland, Enterprise Ireland, The Electricity Supply Board, The Health Service Executive, The Department of Social Protection, Novartis, Intel, Mars, Airbus and Pfizer
  • ****The Global Future of World Foundation aims to help Business, Academia and Goverments around the globe to prepare the workforce of the future for a sustainable world by detecting and predicting trends and paradigms for successful transformation ( http://globalfutureofwork.com/ )
  • + The Institute for Business Research serves as the hub for externally funded business research within the Broad College of Business, and as part of the Michigan State University (MSU) campus-wide research infrastructure, collaborates with other MSU Colleges/Departments as well as the Offices of Regulatory Affairs, MSU Technology, Sponsored Programs, Business Connect and Contract and Grant Administration
  • ++ The People Management Center (PMC) is an organization located with the department of Human Resource Studies at Tilburg University, which serves as a platform for global HR excellence to connect staff and students of the department, TIAS Business School and the business partners in the HR field

Appendix 2: Interview guide

According to your research experience, do you consider that research is individual or collective? What individuals or agents do you collaborate with in the development of your research projects?

Could you say that you have a stable research group? Do you have stable relationships with agents outside the group?

Could you briefly describe how work is normally organized in the research projects in which you participate?

Do you engage with professional partners in the development of research? How was this experience? What difficulties and benefits did you find in these collaborations?

Normally, what motivates your choice of research topics?

Could you specify the different steps of the research processes conducted in your group?

Which of them do you think are more important?

Do you think your research is relevant to the professional community?

Have you ever carried out a research project collaboratively with the professional community?

Do you consider that research in our field must be produced only for academics? Is it considered possible or viable to produce research jointly with the professional community?

How much time would you say that the whole process takes, from the time you have a stimulus to research until the time an output is generated?

What specific steps of the process do you feel are more time-consuming?

Do you usually change your research ideas and initial impressions after contrasting them with the rest of the members of your research team? Do you also do this with non-academic agents?

Does your research group have formal procedures (such as regular meetings) established? Do they incorporate external agents?

Could you say that the group has established routines to develop research activities?

Does your research team have a strong shared culture?

What do you think are the skills, knowledge or experience necessary to carry out a successful academic career? How would you describe a successful researcher in terms of knowledge, skills and experience?

How are these skills distributed in your group? Are there members specialized in some specific activities or phases of the research process?

How would you describe internal relationships within your research team?

Have you ever had communication problems between the members of the unit? How would you describe your communication with external and/or professional agents?

How is your research normally funded?

Do you receive funding from non-academic institutions, such as firms or professional foundations?

How do you think that the prevalent academic culture affects the development of your research?

Could you describe the process through which your research results are disseminated?

What are the criteria used to select the specific means through which research results are disseminated? To what extent do you make use of non-academic or professional channels?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

de Frutos-Belizón, J., Martín-Alcázar, F. & Sánchez-Gardey, G. The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap. Rev Manag Sci 15 , 1465–1515 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00397-x

Download citation

Received : 27 June 2017

Accepted : 01 June 2020

Published : 15 June 2020

Issue Date : August 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00397-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Human resource management research
  • Valley of death
  • Research–practice divide
  • Rigor–relevance gap

JEL Classification

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research
  • Browse All Articles
  • Newsletter Sign-Up

HumanResources →

No results found in working knowledge.

  • Were any results found in one of the other content buckets on the left?
  • Try removing some search filters.
  • Use different search filters.
  • Mobile Site
  • Staff Directory
  • Advertise with Ars

Filter by topic

  • Biz & IT
  • Gaming & Culture

Front page layout

Words with imaginary friends —

The ai wars heat up with claude 3, claimed to have “near-human” abilities, willison: "no model has beaten gpt-4 on a range of widely used benchmarks like this.".

Benj Edwards - Mar 4, 2024 8:50 pm UTC

The Anthropic Claude 3 logo.

On Monday, Anthropic released Claude 3, a family of three AI language models similar to those that power ChatGPT . Anthropic claims the models set new industry benchmarks across a range of cognitive tasks, even approaching "near-human" capability in some cases. It's available now through Anthropic's website, with the most powerful model being subscription-only. It's also available via API for developers.

Further Reading

Claude 3's three models represent increasing complexity and parameter count: Claude 3 Haiku, Claude 3 Sonnet, and Claude 3 Opus. Sonnet powers the Claude.ai chatbot now for free with an email sign-in. But as mentioned above, Opus is only available through Anthropic's web chat interface if you pay $20 a month for "Claude Pro," a subscription service offered through the Anthropic website. All three feature a 200,000-token context window. (The context window is the number of tokens—fragments of a word—that an AI language model can process at once.)

We covered the launch of Claude in March 2023 and Claude 2 in July that same year. Each time, Anthropic fell slightly behind OpenAI's best models in capability while surpassing them in terms of context window length. With Claude 3, Anthropic has perhaps finally caught up with OpenAI's released models in terms of performance, although there is no consensus among experts yet—and the presentation of AI benchmarks is notoriously prone to cherry-picking.

A Claude 3 benchmark chart provided by Anthropic.

Claude 3 reportedly demonstrates advanced performance across various cognitive tasks, including reasoning, expert knowledge, mathematics, and language fluency. (Despite the lack of consensus over whether large language models "know" or "reason," the AI research community commonly uses those terms.) The company claims that the Opus model, the most capable of the three, exhibits "near-human levels of comprehension and fluency on complex tasks."

That's quite a heady claim and deserves to be parsed more carefully. It's probably true that Opus is "near-human" on some specific benchmarks, but that doesn't mean that Opus is a general intelligence like a human (consider that pocket calculators are superhuman at math). So, it's a purposely eye-catching claim that can be watered down with qualifications.

According to Anthropic, Claude 3 Opus beats GPT-4 on 10 AI benchmarks, including MMLU (undergraduate level knowledge), GSM8K (grade school math), HumanEval (coding), and the colorfully named HellaSwag (common knowledge). Several of the wins are very narrow, such as 86.8 percent for Opus vs. 86.4 percent on a five-shot trial of MMLU, and some gaps are big, such as 84.9 percent on HumanEval over GPT-4's 67.0 percent. But what that might mean, exactly, to you as a customer is difficult to say.

"As always, LLM benchmarks should be treated with a little bit of suspicion," says AI researcher Simon Willison , who spoke with Ars about Claude 3. "How well a model performs on benchmarks doesn't tell you much about how the model 'feels' to use. But this is still a huge deal—no other model has beaten GPT-4 on a range of widely used benchmarks like this."

reader comments

Channel ars technica.

IMAGES

  1. Human Resource Thesis Sample

    human resource theory research paper

  2. Perception des ressources de management dans les PME-ETI

    human resource theory research paper

  3. 👍 Human resources research papers. Free HR briefing papers. 2019-02-28

    human resource theory research paper

  4. Thesis Proposal For Human Resource Management

    human resource theory research paper

  5. (PDF) HUMAN RESOURCE THEORY: FROM HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENTS OF MAYO TO

    human resource theory research paper

  6. research papers on human resource management

    human resource theory research paper

VIDEO

  1. Making Theory Contributions in Management Research

  2. Human Resource Management

  3. Imogene King: Goal Attainment Theory

  4. Friday-Beyond i.i.d. in the Resource Theory of Asymmetry: An Information-Spectrum Approach for

  5. Ethics In Business Research (HRM)

  6. Top 10 Human Resource Thesis research topics research paper

COMMENTS

  1. A Systematic Review of Human Resource Management Systems and Their

    Strategic human resource management (SHRM) research increasingly focuses on the performance effects of human resource (HR) systems rather than individual HR practices (Combs, Liu, Hall, & Ketchen, 2006).Researchers tend to agree that the focus should be on systems because employees are simultaneously exposed to an interrelated set of HR practices rather than single practices one at a time, and ...

  2. (PDF) HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: THEORY TO PRACTICE ...

    In keeping with an inaugural issue, we seek in this paper to do four things: to trace the origins of human resource management (HRM); to provide an explication and critique of it as a conceptual ...

  3. Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice

    PDF | On Jul 3, 2012, Omotayo Adewale Osibanjo and others published Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

  4. Full article: Context and HRM: Theory, Evidence, and Proposals

    Human resource management (HRM) has paid insufficient attention to the impact of context. In this article, we outline the need for HRM to take full account of context, particularly national context, and to use both cultural theories and, particularly, institutional theories to do that. We use research publications that utilize the Cranet data ...

  5. The Resource-Based View of the Firm, Human Resources, and Human Capital

    Since the 1990s, the RBV has been a major influence on strategic HR and later strategic HC. Wright and McMahan (1992: 303) noted that "great potential exists for . . . resource-based theory in [strategic HR] research," and Wright, McMahan, and McWilliams (1994) provided further advances. According to Kaufman (2015: 516-517), the "RBV . . . has been hugely influential . . . and most ...

  6. Human Resource Management Review

    Conceptual Development for Future Research The Human Resource Management Review (HRMR) is a quarterly academic journal devoted to the publication of scholarly conceptual/theoretical articles pertaining to human resource management and allied fields (e.g. industrial/organizational psychology, human capital, labor relations, organizational behavior). ). HRMR welcomes manuscripts that focus on ...

  7. Bridging human resource management theory and practice: Implications

    1 INTRODUCTION. That management research is largely detached from the needs of management practitioners is not a new argument (Rynes et al., 2001).Wood and Budhwar make the case, specifically in the context of human resource management (HRM), that we must leverage theory more meaningfully.In a similar vein, Aguinis and Cronin (2022, p.2) argue that we should not be "clogging our science ...

  8. Sustainable HRM and well-being: systematic review and future research

    This paper attempts to undertake a systematic literature review to identify ways and means by which sustainable human resource management (HRM) and well-being are linked for better individual and organizational outcomes. Its primary focus is to study whether sustainable HRM predicts well-being at work? If yes, how and when this prediction takes place? Systematic computerized search and review ...

  9. Labor process theory and critical HRM: A systematic review and agenda

    LPT has been one of the theoretical lenses through which critical human resource management (HRM) scholars have attempted to challenge taken-for-granted concepts and approaches introduced by mainstream, positivist, and functionalist HRM research. Yet, an effort to consolidate its significance in critical HRM is missing in the extant literature.

  10. Human Resource Management Theory and Its Inspiration

    The pioneer of human resource management in modern business organizations is the scientific management theory founded by Taylor. This theory is centered on improving the efficiency of human labor and focuses on two areas: (1) the study of human work, i.e., action research and time research.

  11. The employee perspective on HR practices: A systematic literature

    1. Employee Perceptions of HRM as an Antecedent, Mediator, or Outcome. Nishii and Wright (Citation 2008) developed the SHRM process framework to unravel the link between HRM and performance to shed light on the processes through which HR practices impact organizational performance (Jiang et al., Citation 2013).The starting point of the SHRM process model is the concept of variation.

  12. HRM practices and innovation: an empirical systematic review

    Also, research papers having the workplace and the organization as their unit of study was dropped, leaving us with 29 articles. However, studies that used companies and firms interchangeably were adopted, which gave us an addition of 2 articles, leaving us with 31 articles. Human resource management practices and innovation in firm research

  13. Full article: Imprinting in HR process research: a systematic review

    Introduction. Strategic human resource management (HRM) research has traditionally adopted a firm-level, employer-focused approach to examine the relationship between (one or a set of) HR practices and employees and organisational outcomes (Wright & Ulrich, Citation 2017).Despite the body of valuable knowledge gleaned from this body of work (known as HR content research; Sanders et al ...

  14. Human Resource Management Journal

    The Human Resource Management Journal has published several research papers exploring various aspects of HR in contexts of change and turmoil from a number of perspectives. This virtual special issue on HRM in times of turmoil brings together a collection of papers which, when viewed together can help shed light on some of the challenges and ...

  15. Human Resource Development Review: Sage Journals

    Human Resource Development Review (HRDR) is an international journal focusing on theory development for scholars and practitioners in human resource development and related disciplines. HRDR publishes high-quality conceptual work using non-empirical research methods. The journal is committed to advancing HRD by providing fresh theoretical insights, new conceptual models, critical examination ...

  16. The research-practice gap in the field of HRM: a ...

    In recent studies, researchers agree that there is a substantial gap between research and practice in the field of human resource management (HRM). The literature exploring the causes and consequences of this gap does not represent a finely structured discourse; it has focused on analysing the gap from the practitioner side, and it is based on opinions and theoretical discussions rather than ...

  17. "The Underpinning Theories of Human Resource Management" Course

    This paper takes a critical look at human capital theory and its explanation of personal income distribution. I find that human capital theory's claims are dubious at best.

  18. PDF Human Resource Development As A National Policy:

    The theoretical foundation of this paper is a newly developed holistic theory of knowledge and learning (Yang, 2003). The holistic theory defines knowledge as a social construct with three distinctive and interrelated facets— explicit, implicit, and emancipatory knowledge. Knowledge is viewed as human beings' understanding about the

  19. Systems Theory and Thinking as a Foundational Theory in Human Resource

    This study reviews systems theory and thinking (ST&T) as a foundational discipline or theory in human resource development (HRD) research and practice. Using systematic evidence review (SER) of the literature and mapping analysis of HRD curricula across some leading U.S. universities, disconnect between theory and practice of ST&T is discussed.

  20. Human Resource Articles, Research, & Case Studies

    A report by Joseph Fuller and colleagues shows how algorithms and inflexibility prevent companies from accessing valuable talent in a long-term shortage. 1. 2. …. 13. 14. →. New research on human resources from HBS faculty on issues including organizational design, compensation, incentive plans, hiring practices, and recruitment.

  21. Human Relations Theory: Implications for Effective Human Resource

    The paper concludes that the human relations theory forms the bedrock of, and provides the theoretical foundation for effective human resource management in organisations. Discover the world's ...

  22. Human Resource Accounting: a Review of Theory and Research

    Abstract. During the past decade, there has been a growing interest in the idea of accounting for people as organizational resources. This interest has led to an emerging interdisciplinary field of research known as "Human Resource Accounting." This paper reviews the current body of theory and research in human resource accounting.

  23. The AI wars heat up with Claude 3, claimed to have "near-human

    Words with imaginary friends — The AI wars heat up with Claude 3, claimed to have "near-human" abilities Willison: "No model has beaten GPT-4 on a range of widely used benchmarks like this."

  24. Researching employee experiences and behavior in times of crisis

    Individuals with more initial resources or resource gains are more likely to experience further resource gains, whereas those with fewer initial resources or resource losses are more likely to experience further losses (Hobfoll et al., 2018). Conservation of resources theory is relevant for studying employee experiences and behavior, especially ...